[pfSense] pfSense box not visible from LAN, only from WAN

2013-05-08 Thread Marco
have no firewalls rules, except one per interface, which permits all traffic. I can provide more information if necessary, just let me know. How can I make the pfsense box visible from the LAN side? Am I doing something wrong or is this expected? Regards Marco

Re: [pfSense] pfSense box not visible from LAN, only from WAN

2013-05-08 Thread Marco
On 2013–05–08 Chris Bagnall wrote: On 8/5/13 7:41 pm, Marco wrote: no IP configured This would be your problem. This was the problem, indeed. I set the LAN to DHCP and I can see the pfSense box and access the web configurator. How can I make the pfsense box visible from the LAN side? Am I

Re: [pfSense] pfSense box not visible from LAN, only from WAN

2013-05-08 Thread Marco
. That has been the biggest problem in the past. During the peak hours video calls are not possible. Maybe the traffic shaper could be of help. On the other hand I read that skype is very hard to shape. Thank you too for the response. Regards Marco

[pfSense] Hosts in LAN can't see each other

2013-05-12 Thread Marco
the hosts in the WAN including the pfSense box. What do I need to configure that the hosts in the LAN can communicate with each other? Regards Marco ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] Hosts in LAN can't see each other

2013-05-13 Thread Marco
On 2013–05–13 Matthias May wrote: What do I need to configure that the hosts in the LAN can communicate with each other? Did you perhaps disable the checkbox Allow intra-BSS communication ? Thanks, that was the nudge in the right direction I was hoping for. It's working now. Regards Marco

[pfSense] AR9280 network adapter not working

2013-12-11 Thread Marco
) - Let me know if I should provide more information. Best regards Marco ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

[pfSense] Hostname resolution of OpenVPN-connected clients

2015-11-11 Thread Marco
ferent IP address, depending on whether they are connected to the LAN or connected via OpenVPN. How to access the mobile hosts via the same hostname regardless if they are connected to the LAN or VPN? Marco ¹ http://serverfault.com/a/361103/102215 ___ p

Re: [pfSense] Hostname resolution of OpenVPN-connected clients

2015-11-16 Thread Marco
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 04:37:34 + Espen Johansen <pfse...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bsed on your need I think you should convert to l2tp. > > https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/L2TP/IPsec Thanks. I'll have a look at it. Maybe it's a better fit

Re: [pfSense] Hostname resolution of OpenVPN-connected clients

2015-11-12 Thread Marco
like a bit like overkill to just get the DNS working. But I'll read up what it takes to implement RADIUS. Thanks for the response. Marco ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Disable DHCP domain-name request

2015-11-25 Thread Marco
s, you'll see correct data was sent by the DHCP > server. Thanks for the thorough answer. It seems it's not pfSense that is at fault, but the client itself. I'll fire up wireshark and check what's being transmitted to confirm. Marco ___ pfSense maili

Re: [pfSense] Disable DHCP domain-name request

2015-11-25 Thread Marco
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 07:58:38 +0100 Marco <li...@homerow.info> wrote: > Thanks for the thorough answer. It seems it's not pfSense that is at > fault, but the client itself. I'll fire up wireshark and check > what's being transmitted to confirm. Indeed, the correct domain is passe

[pfSense] Disable DHCP domain-name request

2015-11-20 Thread Marco
. But it's empty. Therefore I assume it's using some default values. How can I remove the “domain-name” from the DHCP request list without altering anything else? Or if this is the wrong approach, how to ignore the domain being pushed on the network by the ISP? Marco

Re: [pfSense] Disable DHCP domain-name request

2015-11-21 Thread Marco
there. It seems redundant, but I've also set the domain name in the DHCP server setting. However, on a connected host the full qualified domain name is still set to the ISP provided domain name. Running “hostname” on the pfSense box returns the correct one, though. Marco __

Re: [pfSense] Disable DHCP domain-name request

2015-11-21 Thread Marco
the domain name in System → General Setup and also in the DHCP server setting, which seems redundant. However, on a connected host the full qualified domain name is still set to the ISP provided domain name. Running “hostname” on the pfSense box returns the correct one,

Re: [pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine

2018-02-12 Thread Marco
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 11:59:09 -0600 Steven Spencer <steven.spen...@kdsi.com> wrote: > On 02/12/2018 11:43 AM, Marco wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:21:08 -0600 > > Steven Spencer <steven.spen...@kdsi.com> wrote: > > > >> On 02/11/2018 03:29 PM, Marco w

Re: [pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine

2018-02-12 Thread Marco
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:21:08 -0600 Steven Spencer <steven.spen...@kdsi.com> wrote: > On 02/11/2018 03:29 PM, Marco wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:46:41 + > > "Joseph L. Casale" <jcas...@activenetwerx.com> wrote: > > > >> -Ori

Re: [pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine

2018-02-12 Thread Marco
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 15:23:43 -0800 Chris L <c...@viptalk.net> wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2018, at 1:29 PM, Marco <li...@homerow.info> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:46:41 + > > "Joseph L. Casale" <jcas...@activenetwerx.com> wrote: &g

Re: [pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine

2018-02-12 Thread Marco
d “Apply Filter” and it shows “No logs to disply”. That means that the packet is not blocked by an implicit or explicit firewall rule, right? Marco ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine

2018-02-12 Thread Marco
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:12:53 -0500 James Ronald <jron...@drewtech.com> wrote: > What is the default gateway of the destination (is there a route back > to pfSense)? pfSense is the default gateway of the destination. Marco ___ pfSense

[pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine

2018-02-11 Thread Marco
UPnP is not used I guess I'm missing the obvious here, since port forwards are rather straightforward in pfSense and have never given me troubles in the past. A nudge in the right direction is appreciated. Marco ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine

2018-02-11 Thread Marco
he destination, if it's > actually receiving traffic and/or sending it elsewhere (routing rule) > this will provide some insight. I ran a wireshark on the destination and it received packets when “port testing” from the pfSense, but not when using external access (e.g. canyouseeme.org) Marco __

Re: [pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine

2018-02-11 Thread Marco
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 12:42:34 -0800 Chris L <c...@viptalk.net> wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2018, at 11:12 AM, Marco <li...@homerow.info> wrote: > > > > 6) Packet capture: > > > >https://i.imgur.com/xT3qFXW.png > > What interface is

Re: [pfSense] Port forwards don't work on one machine

2018-02-18 Thread Marco
, but now it works for some magical reason. Thanks to all of you for the support and sorry for the noise (of having nothing to do with pfSense). Marco ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Go

[pfSense] Host override without host part

2018-04-12 Thread Marco
that? foobar.com → 10.0.10.10 I can't leave the host part empty. Pfsense doesn't allow for that. Any ideas? Marco ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Host override without host part

2018-04-12 Thread Marco
for that. > > Any ideas? > > > > Works for me. pfSense 2.4.3. It does indeed. I tried to leave it empty and got an error message. No clue what I did. Works as expected. Sorry for the noise and thanks for the quick response. Marco __