[pfSense] Double WAN with same GW

2012-07-09 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Hello, I have seen couple of threads about dual WAN bound to the same GW. I wanted to know if there was a proper way of dealing with this ? And what you suggested ? The idea is to set up a Gateway Group and be able to define various load balancing policies… (Policy based routing) + (2 Tier 1

[pfSense] Snort taking ages to reload

2013-02-22 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Hi, I was wondering if It is normal that snort takes ages to reload after each modification we are doing ? It takes an average of 1 to 5 minutes to reload and give back the control through the GUI. Any advise ? Thanks. G.B.

Re: [pfSense] Snort taking ages to reload

2013-02-22 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 22 févr. 2013 à 17:43, David Burgess apt@gmail.com a écrit : On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 AM, b...@todoo.biz b...@todoo.biz wrote: Hi, I was wondering if It is normal that snort takes ages to reload after each modification we are doing ? It takes an average of 1 to 5 minutes

Re: [pfSense] Snort taking ages to reload

2013-02-22 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 22 févr. 2013 à 20:46, b...@todoo.biz a écrit : Le 22 févr. 2013 à 17:43, David Burgess apt@gmail.com a écrit : On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 AM, b...@todoo.biz b...@todoo.biz wrote: Hi, I was wondering if It is normal that snort takes ages to reload after each modification we

Re: [pfSense] Snort taking ages to reload

2013-02-22 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 22 févr. 2013 à 20:49, b...@todoo.biz b...@todoo.biz a écrit : Le 22 févr. 2013 à 20:46, b...@todoo.biz a écrit : Le 22 févr. 2013 à 17:43, David Burgess apt@gmail.com a écrit : On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 AM, b...@todoo.biz b...@todoo.biz wrote: Hi, I was wondering

Re: [pfSense] Snort taking ages to reload

2013-02-22 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 22 févr. 2013 à 21:00, b...@todoo.biz a écrit : Le 22 févr. 2013 à 20:49, b...@todoo.biz b...@todoo.biz a écrit : Le 22 févr. 2013 à 20:46, b...@todoo.biz a écrit : Le 22 févr. 2013 à 17:43, David Burgess apt@gmail.com a écrit : On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 AM, b

Re: [pfSense] Dandy pfSense appliance

2013-04-25 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Hello M. Washington, We are official / listed resellers of pfSense appliances : All of these are high quality hardware based on Intel Atom : http://www.osnet.eu/en/content/firewall-fwa-3020 (4 ports) http://www.osnet.eu/en/content/firewall-fwa-3030 (6 ports fanless)

Re: [pfSense] looking for IPv6 pfSense setup

2013-05-04 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Hello, You can check my settings here… Ok, they are in French, but It is more or less the same as your user case. http://www.osnet.eu/fr/content/pfsense-en-ipv6-sur-un-lien-dsl-ovh There are images, that might help you figure out how things are done / network topology. Basically : 1.

Re: [pfSense] Full Backup/Restore for pfSense

2013-05-04 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Hi, I've been reading this thread with interest. Honestly I don't see any good reason to use dd to create a clone of your config. It will be a total waste of time compared to the classic install. The path that I would rather take will be : 1. Classic install with the version that suits

Re: [pfSense] The Heartbleed Bug, CVE-2014-0160

2014-04-08 Thread b...@todoo.biz
If you have a look at this page : http://heartbleed.com/ You would notice that this bug concerns OpenSSL : • OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (inclusive) are vulnerable • OpenSSL 1.0.1g is NOT vulnerable • OpenSSL 1.0.0 branch is NOT vulnerable • OpenSSL 0.9.8 branch

Re: [pfSense] The Heartbleed Bug, CVE-2014-0160

2014-04-08 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 8 avr. 2014 à 14:14, Pete Boyd petes-li...@thegoldenear.org a écrit : On 08/04/2014 12:59, b...@todoo.biz wrote: You would notice that this bug concerns OpenSSL : • OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (inclusive) are vulnerable • OpenSSL 0.9.8 branch is NOT vulnerable If you

Re: [pfSense] The Heartbleed Bug, CVE-2014-0160

2014-04-08 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 8 avr. 2014 à 16:01, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org a écrit : On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:50 AM, mayak ma...@australsat.com wrote: this is a nightmare -- NSA is having a field day with this. how long has it been around? http://heartbleed.com full FAQ for ya. From my humble point of view :

Re: [pfSense] The Heartbleed Bug, CVE-2014-0160

2014-04-08 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 8 avr. 2014 à 19:07, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com a écrit : So what version of OpenSSL is running on 2.1.0? Sorry if this has been answered already Type: openssl version This might not be enough as there are two versions of openssl installed… One in /usr/bin/openssl and one in

Re: [pfSense] upgrade dual ALIX netgate box?

2014-05-08 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Hi we are french resellers of Alix / APU Le 6 mai 2014 à 21:16, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org a écrit : I have the dual ALIX RM1U box from netgate which is a bit over 2 years old now (and an older one too!) Has anyone attempted replacing the ALIX boards with APU2 boards? They appear to use

Re: [pfSense] upgrade dual ALIX netgate box?

2014-05-09 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 8 mai 2014 à 21:18, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com a écrit : On May 8, 2014, at 12:04 PM, b...@todoo.biz wrote: Hi we are french resellers of Alix / APU Le 6 mai 2014 à 21:16, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org a écrit : I have the dual ALIX RM1U box from netgate which is a bit over 2

[pfSense] Status of pfSense 2.2 regarding 802.11n

2014-05-15 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Hi, I wanted to know what was the status of 2.2 regarding WLAN (802.11 n) support / implementation ? I am mainly interested in Atheros driver support since most of our HW is based on this chipset. Thanks for your update.

Re: [pfSense] PFS 2.1.4 -- IPv6 with PPPoE

2014-07-08 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Managed but Unmanaged which uses stateless autoconfig… And priority was set to « Normal ». I’ll give It a try and let you know how It went. PastedGraphic-2.png Hope it might help, __ Olivier Mascia tipgroup.com/om Le 6 juil. 2014 à 23:32, b...@todoo.biz a écrit : Hi, We are trying

[pfSense] Status of LDAP auth with captive portal on 2.2

2014-07-10 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Hi all, I am trying to figure out what is the status of LDAP auth with captive portal in 2.2 ? This is quite important since I need to know if I can rely on that for some project. If this project is a « work in progress », we might contribute in order to make It move a bit faster.

Re: [pfSense] ZFS warning message on local console during boot

2014-07-31 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 31 juil. 2014 à 03:04, Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com a écrit : tl;dr: I wouldn’t run ZFS… yet. I didn’t see the error message, you’re barking up a tree attempting to use it right now. That said, there are certain advantages to ZFS, and there are internal experiments underway

[pfSense] NetFlow analysis tools

2015-01-15 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Hello, I would like to know which flow-tools you are using in conjunction with pfflowd / netflow I am particularly interested in GUI back-end. If you have any good pointer, that would really be helpful. Sincerely yours.

Re: [pfSense] NetFlow analysis tools

2015-01-19 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 18 janv. 2015 à 16:22, Larry Sampas la...@larrysampas.com a écrit : I haven't played with many GUI tools other than FlowBAT, which is very new, but I have been using SiLK at scale for some time now, and it's been very stable. Since we run securityonion, I've been using these

Re: [pfSense] 2.2-RELEASE now available!

2015-01-26 Thread b...@todoo.biz
Le 24 janv. 2015 à 03:24, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.com a écrit : Details on the blog: https://blog.pfsense.org/?p=1546 ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold!