Re: [pfSense] Rebuilding confidence

2018-05-13 Thread Geoff Wolf
Have you looked at the capabilities of Suricata? It’s an open source IDS/IPS 
available in the pfSense package manager. It takes some setting up and rule 
adjustment to suppress false positives, but it’s fairly straightforward. 
There’s plenty of documentation available for it. I think this might add some 
peace of mind. Also take a look at Quad9. It’s a public recursive DNS service 
that blocks queries for known malicious destinations aggregated from a bunch of 
public block lists. https://www.quad9.net

In the end I think pfSense is going to offer you the most in terms of security 
capabilities compared to the commercial home network solutions out there. It 
just depends upon how much time you’re willing to put into configuring and 
tuning the various tools.

--
Geoffrey Wolf
AB3LS

On May 13, 2018, 3:44 PM -0400, Richard A. Relph , wrote:
> Hi,
> I’ve been using a SG-2440 for a couple of years now, but only as a 
> well-maintained basic NAT router. I know I’m not using all the capabilities 
> the box offers.
> I’m increasingly concerned about ‘infected’ IoT devices inside my firewall. I 
> don’t have any specific concerns. But confidence is continuously declining 
> that everything I implicitly trust is really worthy of that trust. I’m 
> looking for a tool that will provide me some evidence that my network is 
> behaving well, and identify devices that might be betraying my trust.
>
> I’ve been tempted by the McAfee Secure Home Platform built in to certain 
> Arris Cable Modem/Routers. https://securehomeplatform.mcafee.com
> I’d be interested in this groups thoughts on that product… but I’m even more 
> interested in thoughts on what pfSense offers that could detect “unusual” 
> traffic.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Richard
> PS. Also looking for recommendations to replace my aging Access Point… An 
> Apple TimeMachine (in Bridge mode).
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Rebuilding confidence

2018-05-13 Thread C. R. Oldham


On 13 May 2018, at 15:48, Eero Volotinen wrote:



You can replace you apple timemachine with unifi aps.
https://www.ubnt.com/unifi/unifi-ap/


I second the recommendation of the UniFi access points.  They are 
excellent.


While I advocate strongly for pfSense, Ubiquiti also offers a "security 
gateway" product that might be worth looking into for your IoT needs.


--cro
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold


Re: [pfSense] Rebuilding confidence

2018-05-13 Thread ED Fochler
Richard, 
I agree with Eero, VLANs are real security.  It will require time and 
effort and maybe some additional equipment.  If it helps you sleep at night, 
it's worth it.  You might start with just IP groupings and rules though.

I have an admin network that only has a couple of computers wired into it.  
admin has access to my home and the internet.  My home network (mostly 
wireless, satellite box, etc) does not have access to admin, but does have 
access to the internet.
That's VLANs.

I also recommend floating address dhcp for addresses .100-.199 and dhcp 
reservations for .200+ devices that should not have access to the internet, 
like a printer.  And addresses below .100 for devices you know and wish to 
identify regularly.  Then you can try limiting access to the internet to none 
for .200+, only to ports 80, 443 for .100-.199, and full internet (but not 
admin) access for your iphone, xbox, whatever.  It's not as strong a separation 
between trusted and untrusted networks as VLANs are, but it does inhibit some 
multi-stage infection vectors.  I do both.

I can still use my iphone as a remote for my satellite box with this config.  I 
don't fear having my set top box infect my computer that I use for web-banking 
because they do not talk.

D-Link has some low cost vlan-smart switches available that seem to work pretty 
well at a totally acceptable cost.

Ethernet over powerline is an easy way to get more private devices off of your 
wireless network without running cat-6 through your walls or punching your own 
RJ-45 connectors.

PFSense should be able to provide you with separated networks with additional 
ports or by send multiple tagged VLANs to a smart/managed switched where you 
can break them out as needed.  And statically assigning addresses, blocking 
communication by address range, it's all in there.

Good luck,

ED.



> On 2018, May 13, at 3:48 PM, Eero Volotinen  wrote:
> 
> Well. You should use VLANs to segment IoT devices into different network.
> Anyway... some commercial vendor might provide a bit better protection ;)
> 
> You can replace you apple timemachine with unifi aps.
> https://www.ubnt.com/unifi/unifi-ap/
> 
> Eero
> 
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:44 PM Richard A. Relph 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>I’ve been using a SG-2440 for a couple of years now, but only as a
>> well-maintained basic NAT router. I know I’m not using all the capabilities
>> the box offers.
>>I’m increasingly concerned about ‘infected’ IoT devices inside my
>> firewall. I don’t have any specific concerns. But confidence is
>> continuously declining that everything I implicitly trust is really worthy
>> of that trust. I’m looking for a tool that will provide me some evidence
>> that my network is behaving well, and identify devices that might be
>> betraying my trust.
>> 
>>I’ve been tempted by the McAfee Secure Home Platform built in to
>> certain Arris Cable Modem/Routers. https://securehomeplatform.mcafee.com
>>I’d be interested in this groups thoughts on that product… but I’m
>> even more interested in thoughts on what pfSense offers that could detect
>> “unusual” traffic.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Richard
>> PS. Also looking for recommendations to replace my aging Access Point… An
>> Apple TimeMachine (in Bridge mode).
>> ___
>> pfSense mailing list
>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Rebuilding confidence

2018-05-13 Thread Eero Volotinen
Well. You should use VLANs to segment IoT devices into different network.
Anyway... some commercial vendor might provide a bit better protection ;)

You can replace you apple timemachine with unifi aps.
https://www.ubnt.com/unifi/unifi-ap/

Eero

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:44 PM Richard A. Relph 
wrote:

> Hi,
> I’ve been using a SG-2440 for a couple of years now, but only as a
> well-maintained basic NAT router. I know I’m not using all the capabilities
> the box offers.
> I’m increasingly concerned about ‘infected’ IoT devices inside my
> firewall. I don’t have any specific concerns. But confidence is
> continuously declining that everything I implicitly trust is really worthy
> of that trust. I’m looking for a tool that will provide me some evidence
> that my network is behaving well, and identify devices that might be
> betraying my trust.
>
> I’ve been tempted by the McAfee Secure Home Platform built in to
> certain Arris Cable Modem/Routers. https://securehomeplatform.mcafee.com
> I’d be interested in this groups thoughts on that product… but I’m
> even more interested in thoughts on what pfSense offers that could detect
> “unusual” traffic.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Richard
> PS. Also looking for recommendations to replace my aging Access Point… An
> Apple TimeMachine (in Bridge mode).
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold