Of Karl Fife
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:18 PM
To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org>
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Soeckris Net5501 SSD
Ed, you said it well here: "wear leveling work is in SATA and DOM"
I think this is an important point, because
:18 PM
To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <list@lists.pfsense.org>
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Soeckris Net5501 SSD
Ed, you said it well here: "wear leveling work is in SATA and DOM"
I think this is an important point, because If I understand correctly, there is
nothing
Ed, you said it well here: "wear leveling work is in SATA and DOM"
I think this is an important point, because If I understand correctly,
there is nothing inherent to DOM or SATA to make it more or less
suitable to the excellent implementations we've seen of
over-provisioning, wear-leveling
Karl,
There are numerous other similar answers to be found, but here’s mine:
Get away from CF if you can. The modern performance and wear leveling work is
in sata and DOM, those are better devices. Abandon the nano-BSD and just find
the miscellaneous checkbox to put /tmp and /var in
