[REBOL] Rebol Bug-List Re:

2000-10-13 Thread lmecir

Hi,

I don't understand, why your mail didn't get through (I received your
previous mail normally).

> Hi, Ladislav.
>
> I'm replying through the Rebol list, because my ISP says:
> 
> This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
>
> Your message was not delivered because the return address was refused.
>
> The return address was '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> 
>
> It seems your email service doesn't like me. :-(
>
> You wrote (directly to me):
> > How about the bug list organization - all bugs in one file, or a file
for
> every bug?
>
> One bug = one file. One file to list them, one file to describe them, and
> one file to link them all! :-)
>
> Apart from sounding like a line from Tolkien, it's a reasonable plan I
> believe.
>
> Suggestions
> Directories like this:
> /Core
> /View
> /Apache
> /Command
>
> Each of the above having:
> /New - This is for new bugs.
> /Fixing - Bugs being fixed (hopefully).
> /Fixed - For fixed bugs.
>
> [Your suggestions here.]

How about /Patched?

>
> Andrew Martin
> ICQ: 26227169
> http://members.nbci.com/AndrewMartin/
> -><-
>
>




[REBOL] Rebol Bug-List Re:(3)

2000-10-13 Thread Petr . Krenzelok



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> pekr wrote:
> > Andrew wrote:
> > > Each of the above having:
> > > /New - This is for new bugs.
> > > /Fixing - Bugs being fixed (hopefully).
> > > /Fixed - For fixed bugs.
> > >
> >
> > Seem to be fine strategy, as it comply with your
> component/plug-in/enhancement/patch system.
>
> >  Btw: any progress here? :-)
>
> Still working on system. I've realised I need a simpler system to store them
> to my site, and to retrieve them from other locations.
>

What's the problem with storage? /components/component-name.r's header contains
'home or 'file, the fields to store the storage, e.g.
www.somesite.com/rebol/components/component-name.r. Or are you talking about
anything else?

>
> > > [Your suggestions here.]
>
> > you should buy me a beer ;-)
>
> ===
> | This voucher permits the bearer:|
> |  one (1) beer   |
> | at any virtual bar on the internet. |
> | Signed: Andrew Martin.  |
> ===
>

:-))) Well, thanks, I will enjoy it. Anyone to join me? :-)

>
> Andrew Martin
> ICQ: 26227169
> http://members.nbci.com/AndrewMartin/
> -><-




[REBOL] Rebol Bug-List Re:(2)

2000-10-13 Thread Al . Bri

pekr wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > Each of the above having:
> > /New - This is for new bugs.
> > /Fixing - Bugs being fixed (hopefully).
> > /Fixed - For fixed bugs.
> >
>
> Seem to be fine strategy, as it comply with your
component/plug-in/enhancement/patch system.

>  Btw: any progress here? :-)

Still working on system. I've realised I need a simpler system to store them
to my site, and to retrieve them from other locations.

> > [Your suggestions here.]

> you should buy me a beer ;-)

===
| This voucher permits the bearer:|
|  one (1) beer   |
| at any virtual bar on the internet. |
| Signed: Andrew Martin.  |
===

Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http://members.nbci.com/AndrewMartin/
-><-





[REBOL] Rebol Bug-List Re:

2000-10-13 Thread joel . neely

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> One bug = one file. One file to list them, one file to describe them, and
> one file to link them all! :-)
> 
> Apart from sounding like a line from Tolkien, it's a reasonable plan I
> believe.
> 
> Suggestions
> Directories like this:
> /Core
> /View
> /Apache
> /Command
> 
> Each of the above having:
> /New - This is for new bugs.
> /Fixing - Bugs being fixed (hopefully).
> /Fixed - For fixed bugs.
> 
> [Your suggestions here.]
> 

Does the /New /Fixing /Fixed trichotomy imply that a bug report
would migrate between directories as its status changes?  This
would imply that I couldn't, for example, bookmark a bug report
and return periodically (or via a REBOL 'bot ;-) to check for
changes in status.

Would it be simpler to have a "status" datum for each report,
and have a variety of list/link files to categorize them in
various useful ways (platform, status, who reported, version
in which it appeared, version in which it was exterminated...)?

-jn-




[REBOL] Rebol Bug-List Re:

2000-10-13 Thread Petr . Krenzelok



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi, Ladislav.
>
> I'm replying through the Rebol list, because my ISP says:
> 
> This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
>
> Your message was not delivered because the return address was refused.
>
> The return address was '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> 
>
> It seems your email service doesn't like me. :-(
>
> You wrote (directly to me):
> > How about the bug list organization - all bugs in one file, or a file for
> every bug?
>
> One bug = one file. One file to list them, one file to describe them, and
> one file to link them all! :-)
>
> Apart from sounding like a line from Tolkien, it's a reasonable plan I
> believe.
>
> Suggestions
> Directories like this:
> /Core
> /View
> /Apache
> /Command
>
> Each of the above having:
> /New - This is for new bugs.
> /Fixing - Bugs being fixed (hopefully).
> /Fixed - For fixed bugs.
>

Seem to be fine strategy, as it comply with your
component/plug-in/enhancement/patch system. Btw: any progress here? :-)

-pekr-

> [Your suggestions here.]
>

you should buy me a beer ;-)

>
> Andrew Martin
> ICQ: 26227169
> http://members.nbci.com/AndrewMartin/
> -><-