On 7/15/06 4:39 AM, Elle Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to ask for a site check and code review please.
Any suggestions for maybe writing the code different or maybe better are
welcome.
Looks great. Checked on Mac Opera 9.01.
Oh and IMHO, I¹ve seen many more boring pages than
From: Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:25:18 -0400
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Conversation: [WSG] site check and code review
Subject: Re: [WSG] site check and code review
I wanted to ask for a site check and code review please.
Any suggestions for maybe
Hi Dean,
From what I see you're missing /fieldset ... see below...
/label
div class=clearer/div
. add /fieldset ..
!--Equal Employment Fieldset Start--
fieldset class=radio
legend
Equal Employment Statiscal Information
/legend
Same is true for Address under
On 7/17/06 11:01 AM, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.stthomasaquinasacademy.org/employment.mgi
No time to look at the moment but wanted to say that that's one nice lookin'
form.
(Opera 9.01 Mac)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph:
Looks great so far!
I haven't had the chance to extensively look into it, but from what I can
see it may be your div.clearer's. FF does not recognize a div unless it has
content. Place a nbsp; inside of each of those and you should be good to
go. (maybe) :)
As for visuals in IE, I'd like to
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Mya wrote:
From what I see you're missing /fieldset ... see below...
No, the closing fieldset tags are at the end so that the nesting of
categories comes out right.
Thanks for the thought though.
Dean
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Joe wrote:
it may be your div.clearer's. FF does not recognize a div unless
it has
content. Place a nbsp; inside of each of those and you should be
good to
go. (maybe) :)
Joe I thought you had it, but no joy.
There is certainly something Firefox doesn't
Hi again Dean,
I've had a look around and this seems to be related to this Mozilla bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309550
It looks as if this has been fixed in Mozilla 1.8.1. I'm not sure
which Mozilla build FF 1.5 was based on, but this bug pretty clearly
describes the issue
On 7/17/06 2:45 PM, Jeff Van Campen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, this brings up an interesting issue. Does anyone know of
if Mozilla provides a guide to which Firefox versions are based on
which Mozilla builds? Is the relationship even that clear any more?
Thanks,
I believe
I need to agree with David re:
http://www.stthomasaquinasacademy.org/employment.mgi
Please please please consider breaking this form into multiple pages.
You can post the results of each page to the next and display what has
been completed already below the current section. The gradient and
On Jul 17, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Jeff Van Campen wrote:
I tried the following, however, and it seemed to do the trick:
fieldset {
clear:both;
}
On Jul 17, 2006, at 2:30 PM, David Dixon wrote:
Adding a clear:both to your #horizForm fieldset definition seems
to clear the problem nicely in FF
At 05:51 PM 7/14/2006, Matthew Pennell wrote:
... Is anyone aware of any web standards community setup type things
in Cambridge (UK) ...
You might try the Cambridge University engineering people
http://rehab-www.eng.cam.ac.uk/cwuaat/cwuaat04.htm#OrganisingComm.
ps: I missed them on my last
Im going to agree with these two...I have filled out some forms before that were just as long but on seperate pages and they also had a progress bar on the bottom telling the user how far into it had they been and how far to go.
It does look nifty thoughOn 7/18/06, Christian Montoya [EMAIL
Hi all,
I'm fighting through the wads of info (and opinions) out there about CSS image
replacement.
I'm concerned that using CSS like:
text-indent: -9000px;
may get our site penalised by search engines.
Feeling overly pragmatic, I added the following to a page in development:
h1img
Pardon a newbie perspective, I like to show my skip navs a few pixels
up, but visable, useful to see it as well as have it there, I hide it
with a no show in the printing stylesheet. It allows easier keyboad
navigation I think. I'm not sure of any SEO penalty for -9000 pixels,
why not just
15 matches
Mail list logo
