HI steve,
You didnt read my own answer to my post, I found the correct XHTML strict
javascript and its working fine,
Thanks anyway
Michael
Steve Olive wrote:
On Saturday 22 July 2006 07:42, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
Target=_blank
in XHTML (see
Thanks everybody!
The Y'sUI is an excellent option; to style it with CSS also.
Choosing Javascript makes it difficult if the user has it turned off.
I think it was one of the WSG members who choosed also a good way, using
CSS. It is the portableApps site on
i must say michael, that i havent read any answer, just a statement.
On 7/22/06, Michael Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI steve,You didnt read my own answer to my post, I found the correct XHTML strict_javascript_ and its working fine,
On 7/20/06, Michael Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well i prefer to use strict because otherwise i am not pleased for the
validation..
Sorry for my habbit
Michael
Shlomi Asaf wrote:
i must say michael, that i havent read any answer, just a statement.
On 7/22/06, *Michael Persson* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI
Hi,
This solution has nothin to do with common semantics - not recommended.
Janos
On 7/22/06, Al Kendall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try these http://www.html.it/articoli/nifty/index.html
Cheers!!!
Al
**
The discussion list for
Scott Swabey wrote:
Seems like the use of semantically neutral elements to create
imageless rounded corners is more than acceptable. Am I missing
something?
Apart from bloated source-code(?), no, I don't think you have missed
anything :-)
Personally, I think bloated source-code should be
On 7/22/06, Al Kendall wrote:
try these http://www.html.it/articoli/nifty/index.html
At 05:06 AM 7/22/2006, Janos Hardi wrote:
This solution has nothin to do with common semantics - not recommended.
Janos, may I assume that it's the use of the B tag you're objecting
to, rather than
haha, that´s my solution! Using em is the way I was looking for.
Thank you for your help;
Eugenio.
On 7/22/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TuteC wrote:
Thank you very much, Georg. That´s exactly what I want: that the
content overflows or the div expands but mantaining the same
From Links for Light Reading, July 19:
Why CSS Bugs Me
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1987181,00.asp
I just realized that Dvorak's entire rant about CSS cascading rules
might just be another example of a tech expert talking nonsense
regarding an area he knows nothing about.
bodydiv {
May not be answering your question, but relevant to the overall point...
There have been a number of responses to this interesting blog post by
Dvorak including:
http://westciv.typepad.com/dog_or_higher/
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16531828
How do I rate in Google now that accessibility is a variable, I have
about 60 pages ranked four, 30 ranked three.
I watched other sites acquire links by scheming and dealing while I did
everything the google way. I will check my search engine rankings.
I just checked 100 pages (Validated
11 matches
Mail list logo
