Lindsay Evans wrote:
I'm in the process of defining accessibility guidelines for a new
site, and am thinking it would be helpful to eliminate certain WCAG
checkpoints that are no longer relevant and could possibly lead to
usability problems if followed to the letter
Here are my thoughts on
http://www.cmsmatrix.org/ is an excellent CMS comparison site - it
lets you define your own criteria, and contrast several cms-es at
once.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia.html
http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/
may be worth a look as well
I disagree with Patrick's assessment on several points:
10.2 - Some user agents such as Lynx linearise the page but do not support
label elements so it is still important to correctly position the labels.
1.5 - Some users are not able to use image maps for a variety of reasons so
I would always
Hi,
My understanding is that you must declaire a width for floated block level
elements (i.e. div, p, ul etc.) But is this the same for inline elements?
Specificaly, I want to float an input feild and its associated lable, but I
DONT want to give a width (to allow for the form to be liquid).
I think that JavaScript has more need of this notation than other languages,
precisely because of the weak typing. However, those who try and use the same
notation rules for say Java as for JavaScript are going to have trouble. I find
objNAME arrNAME etc useful, and things like txtNAME
None of these solutions have much to do with semantics, and none of them
appear to be fool-proof.
If at all possible, stick with the standards - CSS3 includes a
declaration for rounded corners, which has been supported by Mozilla for
a long time.
Mike
-Original Message-
From:
Nathan,
on Monday, July 24, 2006 at 13:48 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
My understanding is that you must declaire a width for floated block level
elements (i.e. div, p, ul etc.) But is this the same for inline elements?
Specificaly, I want to float an input feild and its associated lable,
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding is that you must declaire a width for floated block level
elements (i.e. div, p, ul etc.) But is this the same for inline elements?
You don't HAVE to declare a width for floated elements.
A floated element with no width
Just be aware that Mac/IE follows the CSS 2.0 spec,
and will make any floated block elements fill the
available horizontal space. This can seriously break
your layout in Mac/IE.
One way to address this is to hide the display:
block and float: left rules from Mac/IE, and tell
it to simply
I think that JavaScript has more need of this notation than other languages,
precisely because of the weak typing. However, those who try and use the same
notation rules for say Java as for JavaScript are going to have trouble. I find
objNAME arrNAME etc useful, and things like txtNAME
Hi Mike,
I absolutely agree.
Janos
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of these solutions have much to do with semantics, and none of them
appear to be fool-proof.
If at all possible, stick with the standards - CSS3 includes a
declaration for rounded corners, which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of these solutions have much to do with semantics, and none of them
appear to be fool-proof.
If at all possible, stick with the standards - CSS3 includes a
declaration for rounded corners, which has been supported by Mozilla for
a long time.
Mike
-
Good
On 7/21/06 9:08 PM, Steve Olive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use the target attribute in XHTML, just not with Strict Doctypes,
and none of the postings have mentioned doctype or whether this is being
served as application/xhtml+xml or text/html.
Ted and Thierry's script is a work
I hope someone out there can help.
It goes without saying that pop-ups are a rather
nasty thing, but I need to find an accessible way to deliver a small number of
pop-ups on a CSS + XMTML strict E-commerce site, offering help as required to
some complex forms that can't be fixed at the
Thanks everyone for your input. That clarifies thing for me now. I have
developed a pretty cool form layout which I really like and it works well
across all browsers I have tested with. Plus it is built on ems, so it zooms
too. Once I get it all rock solid I will post a link and get some
Hello everyone. I have a web page that I use as a public favorites. I have around a hundred different links to outside sites, and I use the target=blank for each one. I searched at W3schools for a way to making all the links in the page target=blank with CSS but couldn´t find one. Is just that in
Hi, I have been playing with Spiffy Corners @ http://www.spiffycorners.com/ for an Intranet but the Spiffy assures that it is Anti-aliased rounded corners using pure CSS. No Images. No _javascript_. No fluff. I can assume you that it is very easy to implement and scalable. Works on Macs too.
Steve Eades wrote:
Hi, I have been playing with Spiffy Corners @
http://www.spiffycorners.com/ for an Intranet but the Spiffy assures
that it is Anti-aliased rounded corners using pure CSS. No Images. No
Javascript. No fluff. I can assume you that it is very easy to
implement and scalable.
Ian Pouncey wrote:
TuteC wrote:
Hello everyone. I have a web page that I use as a public favorites. I
have around a hundred different links to outside sites, and I use the
target=blank for each one. I searched at W3schools for a way to making
all the links in the page target=blank with CSS
I thought this was a very neat solution (without popups):
http://juicystudio.com/article/form-help-without-popups.html
I just triple-bookmarked that (a habit when i consider something
important). very neat and i like the fact that the help icon toggles
with enter key, all of it is very
On 7/25/06, TuteC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent, I think this is what I was searching...
TuteC, what is the advantge of this approuch?
it only helps when u open a new window for a known page, so u dont have to write the url over and over.
but if u change the URL that u wish to open, u will
there is a disccussion next door to you
[WSG] target=_blank
there u could find this link
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/popup_window_with_no_extra_markup.asp
hope its helpfull
NeoSwf
On 7/25/06, Donna Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought this was a very neat solution (without popups):
we are wating for it :)
Neo
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks everyone for your input. That clarifies thing for me now. I havedeveloped a pretty cool form layout which I really like and it works well
across all browsers I have tested with. Plus it is built on ems, so
23 matches
Mail list logo
