On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 08:58:55AM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
I started using xml for certain parts of my online applications...
Now, here is the question... If I would create a whole website using
xml, would it be standard compliant?
If you're serving up a proprietary XML
Is this referring to the actual page being xml or source of data?
Reason I ask is that I find I am increasingly using xml for data source and
parsing it for webpages.
Which seems the best way to go really, as the source of the data matters not,
and the result is standard xhtml.
Bruce Prochnau
so, what you are saying, is that if I would code website with xml, search
engines ( like google ), will not index the site as good as it would if it
would be coded with xhtml?
On 1/5/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 08:58:55AM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
hm... actual page being xml.
On 1/5/07, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this referring to the actual page being xml or source of data?
Reason I ask is that I find I am increasingly using xml for data source
and parsing it for webpages.
Which seems the best way to go really, as the
Quoth Bruce at 01/05/07 18:51...
Is this referring to the actual page being xml or source of data?
Reason I ask is that I find I am increasingly using xml for data source
and parsing it for webpages.
Which seems the best way to go really, as the source of the data matters
not, and the
Quoth Mihael Zadravec at 01/05/07 18:57...
hm... actual page being xml.
Using anything but XHTML or HTML as the language served would cause
major accessibility issues, especially for older user agents that do not
understand XML and would not be able to refer to a DTD.
Certainly, use it
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:25:06AM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
so, what you are saying, is that if I would code website with xml,
search engines ( like google ), will not index the site as good as it
would if it would be coded with xhtml?
If you serve application/xml or text/html
What would than be the right xslt transformation?
Is than the source code of a web document xml or xhtml?
Sorry for strange questions, but I am a bit confused :)
On 1/5/07, Matthew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Bruce at 01/05/07 18:51...
Is this referring to the actual page being
Quoth Mihael Zadravec at 01/05/07 19:12...
What would than be the right xslt transformation?
Is than the source code of a web document xml or xhtml?
Sorry for strange questions, but I am a bit confused :)
If it is convenient for you to handle your data as XML, you can use any
XML vocabulary
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:42:30AM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
What would than be the right xslt transformation?
It would depend on your desired input and output formats.
Is than the source code of a web document xml or xhtml?
Yes.
The document you start with would be XML, and
Actually it does... thank you. I am reading Myers book from Sitepoint
No Nonsense
XML Web Development With PHP and I needed to clear some thing out... So as
I see, in chapter 4. he explains how to generate website using xml and
php... and the final code presentet to browser is xhtml... so that is
Thanks Patrick, very usefull
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Nothing monumental, but I thought this could come in handy -
particularly when put together with existing buttons in a Favorites
tab.
http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/88/
P
Matthew Smith wrote:
Agreed. One can use the most obscure XML internally but, with the right
XSLT transformation, can turn it in to good XHTML (or even HTML).
M
Yuppers, or for us simple guys, (referring to myself and lack of
time/patience/knowledge), I use the magpie parser on php4, much
XML is a set of rules for building a language, it's not a language
itself, so it doesn't really make sense to send XML to the browser
without choosing a particular XML language.
XHTML, DocBook, RSS, TEI and XTM are just a few of the thousands of
XML-compliant languages. Some languages use
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:33:34PM +0100, Svip wrote:
I discovered that anyone have yet to discuss HEC's. So I thought I
might as well start this topic. HEC stands for HTML Encoded
CAPTCHA. It's quite easy, it is using means of HTML and CSS to
create the image which was originally
Hi Mihael,
On 5 Jan 2007 at 8:58, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
I started using xml for certain parts of my online applications...
Now, here is the question... If I would create a whole website using
xml, would it be standard compliant?
if you use Xml in the background and create Html using a
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:33:24PM +0100, Juergen Auer wrote:
Using Xml/Xsl allows a lot of things without PHP/Perl: The menu (all
filenames, link content, accesskey-definitions) is outsourced into a
single file. Its like a template - without any programming language.
XSL is a programming
Hi there,
You might would like to try this:
link title=The site in French type=text/html rel=alternate
hreflang=fr href=http://someplace.com/fr/;
More: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#h-12.3
Here is also some more useful info about this multi-language support too:
On 5 Jan 2007 at 13:44, David Dorward wrote:
Client side XSLT isn't (generally) a great idea though. You do want
search engines to be able to read the menu, don't you?
All search engines and most of the browsers (all instead of IE6) get
the Html-Version. The Xml-Version is blocked by the
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Nothing monumental, but I thought this could come in handy -
particularly when put together with existing buttons in a Favorites
tab.
http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/88/
Just a show of hands, if you don't mind: who here would also be keen to
see those oddly
I just don't see how it's any more accessible than using an image, in
fact it's probably less accessible because of the massive filesize and
CPU load.
Personally I prefer the question and answer style spam protection. You
have an easy question like how do you spell orange? which has to be
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] dreamweaver additional tags extension
document:
True, Paul, I did actually copy a code I wrote a CAPTCHA image to HEC.
Actually, I won't use HEC myself, I just thought I'd share an
example. Despite being a very bad example.
However, your idea was quite good. Except of course with the
inaccessible issue. However, some sites appeal to people
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:50:07PM +0100, Svip wrote:
However, some sites appeal to people who can see,
where it may come in handy.
Being able to see != Being able to solve a CAPTCHA.
Case in point, I can usually only manage 1 in 5 of Yahoo!'s things.
--
David Dorward
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
I'm still convinced that SUB and SUP are primarily presentational
http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg@webstandardsgroup.org/msg24851.html
so I wouldn't really want to include those.
P
I don't want to start the argument all over again, Patrick, but I had
occasion to use SUP
Designer wrote:
I don't want to start the argument all over again, Patrick, but I had
occasion to use SUP recently so I wondered how you'd do it instead? I
presume you'd define it in CSS with a smaller font and bottom padding,
but it seems a bit like overkill . . .?
Depends on the context
hi,
quick question-
what is it that makes non ie browsers put an indent of some kind on a vertical
unordered navigation list?
i ve cleared all the padding and margins. seems to be about 35 pixels.
heres an example-still rough dont slag me for anything else on the page.
http://208.106.200.54/
Kevin:
To answer your question, setting the unordered list's margin and padding to
0 get rid of all the spacing around it, and setting its list-style to none
will get rid of the bullets (at least in Firefox, IE, and Opera).
In the specific case of the site you provided, somehow 40px of left
At 1/5/2007 04:10 PM, Kevin McMonagle wrote:
what is it that makes non ie browsers put an indent of some kind on
a vertical unordered navigation list?
i ve cleared all the padding and margins. seems to be about 35 pixels.
heres an example-still rough dont slag me for anything else on the page.
On 1/6/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being able to see != Being able to solve a CAPTCHA.
Case in point, I can usually only manage 1 in 5 of Yahoo!'s things.
A friend of mine - who is a web developer - has a form of colour
blindness, and although he's never had trouble with any
30 matches
Mail list logo
