[WSG] Empty spans - semantics and accessibility question

2006-06-19 Thread John S. Britsios
Hello everybody. I want to use empty spans for positioning Eye-candy images on my site. Would this violate semantics and accessibility, if it is the best solution for our visitors and for ourselves? Thanks, John -- John S. Britsios Web Architect Marketing Consultant Webnauts Net (Main

Re: [WSG] Empty spans - semantics and accessibility question

2006-06-19 Thread Susan R. Grossman
Using empty spans (or a div) to hold background image for design elements is used quite frequently done because the images are ignored (even by readers so you don't need alt text) and doesn't interfere with accessibility Semantics are not broken, you aren't using headings, or definition listsCSS

Re: [WSG] Empty spans - semantics and accessibility question

2006-06-19 Thread Jared Smith
John S. Britsios wrote: I want to use empty spans for positioning Eye-candy images on my site. Would this violate semantics and accessibility, if it is the best solution for our visitors and for ourselves? Yeah, this is probably the best way to do it, as long as there is not an existing

Re: [WSG] Empty spans - semantics and accessibility question

2006-06-19 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Susan R. Grossman wrote: Semantics are not broken, you aren't using headings, or definition lists CSS is all about separating design from content, and that's what this does. On the other hand, you're peppering your markup (which should define content in meaningful ways) with empty