Re: [WSG] List headings

2006-07-10 Thread pepelsbey
Maybe: dl dtGroup title/dt ddGroup title/dd ddGroup title/dd ddGroup title/dd /dl Or dl dth3Group title/h3/dt ddGroup title/dd ddGroup title/dd ddGroup title/dd /dl Example with lih3.../h3/li li.../li not so good, because h3.../h3 isn't LIST ITEM, it is TITLE of LIST ITEMS

Re: [WSG] List headings

2006-07-10 Thread Steve Olive
On Monday 10 July 2006 16:43, pepelsbey wrote: Maybe: dl dth3Group title/h3/dt ddGroup title/dd ddGroup title/dd ddGroup title/dd /dl I think the best option would be: dl dth1Group title/h1/dt ddGroup item/dd ddGroup item/dd ddGroup item/dd /dl and style

Re: [WSG] List headings

2006-07-10 Thread russ - maxdesign
dl dth1Group title/h1/dt ddGroup item/dd ddGroup item/dd ddGroup item/dd /dl Unfortunately, this is invalid. You can also use block level elements in the definition description, such as the p and ul elements. But you cannot use block level elements inside a definition

Re: [WSG] List headings

2006-07-10 Thread pepelsbey
Specifically: !ELEMENT DT - O (%inline;)* -- definition term -- Pity : \ So... best two solutions, i think: h1Title/h1 ul liItem/li liItem/li /ul and dl dtTitle/dt ddItem/dd ddItem/dd /dl or with STRONG dl dtstrongTitle/strong/dt ddItem/dd ddItem/dd /dl -- ะก

Re: [WSG] List headings

2006-07-10 Thread Ross Bruniges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, 10 July, 2006 9:40:53 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] List headings Specifically: !ELEMENT DT - O (%inline;)* -- definition term -- Pity : \ So... best two solutions, i think: h1Title/h1 ul liItem/li liItem/li /ul and dl

Re: [WSG] List headings

2006-07-10 Thread Darren West
No, you would use a css ;0)On 10/07/06, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you just want it bold you can style it that way in the CSS which I am sure you know already.pepelsbey wrote: Yep. CSS, i know ;) STRONG just for visual emphasis of DT in unstyled content. Not so necessary, but looks

[WSG] List headings

2006-07-09 Thread Kat
May I ask a question which to everybody else probably seems obvious? What is the best way to associate a heading with a list? hnList heading/hn ul li/li li/li li/li /ul OR ul lihnList heading/hn/li li/li li/li /ul this way? The second way seems to suggest a relationship

Re: [WSG] List headings

2006-07-09 Thread Joshua Street
On 7/10/06, Kat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best way to associate a heading with a list? The second way (IMHO) suggests that the heading it itself a list item, not the heading of the list. The first way creates an implicit semantic link between content, as headers preceding paragraphs

Re: [WSG] List headings

2006-07-09 Thread Kenny Graham
This example says the the unordered list fits beneath the hn heading, with all other content below that heading (until new heading found). But what if I want to specify that the heading is for the list only? XHTML2 will take care of this problem for you: section hHigher level heading/h pSome