Dean, about FieldSet
its going to become Deprecated: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.10
Chears
Shlomi.A
On 7/17/06, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried my first table-less form but it's breaking in Firefox.
On 7/25/06, Shlomi Asaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dean, about FieldSet
its going to become Deprecated:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.10
Fieldset is not going to be deprecated... the presentational align
attribute of the fieldset element is.
--
Kay Smoljak
Shlomi Asaf
Dean, about FieldSet its going to become Deprecated:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.10
aehno it wont. the *align attribute* in fieldset is deprecated,
not the fieldset itself...
P
Patrick H. Lauke
Web Editor / University
Shlomi Asaf wrote:
Dean, about FieldSet
its going to become Deprecated:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.10
This is not true. The ALIGN attribute is depreciated, but fieldset
surely is not.
On 7/17/06, *Dean Matthews* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so how could we align the legend in the fieldset? only using CSS?
On 7/25/06, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/25/06, Shlomi Asaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dean, about FieldSet
its going to become Deprecated: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.10Fieldset is not going to
thank you all :)
On 7/25/06, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dean, about FieldSet its going to become Deprecated:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.10Shlomi,The fieldset and legend elements are not deprecated. It is the ³align²attribute associated with the legend that
NICE ONE, really , NICE TO SEE but not nice to to fill...
ABout the issue of TABLE or TABLELESS i will not comment in that case
i thing, if you try both and it weighs them you will see. That's it's
just one i would talk in others people who can acess that from others
ways than a common
Maybe using different pages... not very comfortable but neither scary! :)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
I absolutely agree with Peter. This form should be splitted in differents steps. The user can get lost very easily on this kind of form. It's quite easy to make step by step forms with ajax method. The download speed won't be affected anyway. Once more, as Peter says, it's just html files with one
On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Peter Goddard wrote:
IMHO, as well as the form is styled (and let's face it - it's just a
gradient background to the fieldset basically that gives it the
'look')
That's an unnecessarily patronizing comment ...lets face it -
relativity theory is just E=MC² ;)
Dean,
on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 at 16:04 you wrote:
The client determined the content of the form. Their purpose was to
*filter out* people who wouldn't even attempt to fill it in.
As for those concerned about the single page issue, I see that as a
printed page paradigm. I see little
On 7/18/06, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for those concerned about the single page issue, I see that as a
printed page paradigm. I see little cost/benefit to turning pages
and all the additional work (and expense) of carrying post arguments
backwards and forwards throughout all the
I thought someone else would mention it, or it was possibly an oversight
that would be caught on validation, but is there a reason that the
labels haven't been explicitly associated with their inputs?
I would assume the breakage testing would involve validation.
I'm seeing 253 errors which
Hi Dean,
From what I see you're missing /fieldset ... see below...
/label
div class=clearer/div
. add /fieldset ..
!--Equal Employment Fieldset Start--
fieldset class=radio
legend
Equal Employment Statiscal Information
/legend
Same is true for Address under
On 7/17/06 11:01 AM, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.stthomasaquinasacademy.org/employment.mgi
No time to look at the moment but wanted to say that that's one nice lookin'
form.
(Opera 9.01 Mac)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph:
Looks great so far!
I haven't had the chance to extensively look into it, but from what I can
see it may be your div.clearer's. FF does not recognize a div unless it has
content. Place a nbsp; inside of each of those and you should be good to
go. (maybe) :)
As for visuals in IE, I'd like to
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Mya wrote:
From what I see you're missing /fieldset ... see below...
No, the closing fieldset tags are at the end so that the nesting of
categories comes out right.
Thanks for the thought though.
Dean
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Joe wrote:
it may be your div.clearer's. FF does not recognize a div unless
it has
content. Place a nbsp; inside of each of those and you should be
good to
go. (maybe) :)
Joe I thought you had it, but no joy.
There is certainly something Firefox doesn't
Hi again Dean,
I've had a look around and this seems to be related to this Mozilla bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309550
It looks as if this has been fixed in Mozilla 1.8.1. I'm not sure
which Mozilla build FF 1.5 was based on, but this bug pretty clearly
describes the issue
On 7/17/06 2:45 PM, Jeff Van Campen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, this brings up an interesting issue. Does anyone know of
if Mozilla provides a guide to which Firefox versions are based on
which Mozilla builds? Is the relationship even that clear any more?
Thanks,
I believe
I need to agree with David re:
http://www.stthomasaquinasacademy.org/employment.mgi
Please please please consider breaking this form into multiple pages.
You can post the results of each page to the next and display what has
been completed already below the current section. The gradient and
On Jul 17, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Jeff Van Campen wrote:
I tried the following, however, and it seemed to do the trick:
fieldset {
clear:both;
}
On Jul 17, 2006, at 2:30 PM, David Dixon wrote:
Adding a clear:both to your #horizForm fieldset definition seems
to clear the problem nicely in FF
Im going to agree with these two...I have filled out some forms before that were just as long but on seperate pages and they also had a progress bar on the bottom telling the user how far into it had they been and how far to go.
It does look nifty thoughOn 7/18/06, Christian Montoya [EMAIL
23 matches
Mail list logo
