Designer wrote:
What are your views on a 'Creative Commons' license? [
www.creativecommons.org ]
They're very good licences.
Seems a reasonable idea to me, though I don't really grasp the full
implications of rdf data yet.
Don't use the RDF nonsense they propose for use within (X)HTML
Carl Reynolds wrote:
Designer wrote:
What are your views on a 'Creative Commons' license? [
www.creativecommons.org ]
I believe that the creative commons license has been shown not to be
worth the bits used to create it. There is a loop-hole in the license
that allows anyone to copy any
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Don't use the RDF nonsense they propose for use within (X)HTML that is
actually hidden within a comment. If you're going to embed it in the
file, it needs to be done properly in an XML document and cannot be
done for HTML or XHTML served as text/html.
You could, however,
hi all -
I believe that the creative commons license has been shown not to be
worth the bits used to create it. There is a loop-hole in the license
that allows anyone to copy any work you publish without requiring your
permission or needing to pay any kind of royalty.
Creative Commons is
