[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Juergen Auer
Sent: Friday, 5 January 2007 11:14 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] XML driven websites
On 5 Jan 2007 at 13:44, David Dorward wrote:
Client side XSLT isn't (generally) a great idea though. You do want
search engines
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 08:58:55AM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
I started using xml for certain parts of my online applications...
Now, here is the question... If I would create a whole website using
xml, would it be standard compliant?
If you're serving up a proprietary XML
Is this referring to the actual page being xml or source of data?
Reason I ask is that I find I am increasingly using xml for data source and
parsing it for webpages.
Which seems the best way to go really, as the source of the data matters not,
and the result is standard xhtml.
Bruce Prochnau
so, what you are saying, is that if I would code website with xml, search
engines ( like google ), will not index the site as good as it would if it
would be coded with xhtml?
On 1/5/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 08:58:55AM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
hm... actual page being xml.
On 1/5/07, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this referring to the actual page being xml or source of data?
Reason I ask is that I find I am increasingly using xml for data source
and parsing it for webpages.
Which seems the best way to go really, as the
Quoth Bruce at 01/05/07 18:51...
Is this referring to the actual page being xml or source of data?
Reason I ask is that I find I am increasingly using xml for data source
and parsing it for webpages.
Which seems the best way to go really, as the source of the data matters
not, and the
Quoth Mihael Zadravec at 01/05/07 18:57...
hm... actual page being xml.
Using anything but XHTML or HTML as the language served would cause
major accessibility issues, especially for older user agents that do not
understand XML and would not be able to refer to a DTD.
Certainly, use it
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:25:06AM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
so, what you are saying, is that if I would code website with xml,
search engines ( like google ), will not index the site as good as it
would if it would be coded with xhtml?
If you serve application/xml or text/html
What would than be the right xslt transformation?
Is than the source code of a web document xml or xhtml?
Sorry for strange questions, but I am a bit confused :)
On 1/5/07, Matthew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Bruce at 01/05/07 18:51...
Is this referring to the actual page being
Quoth Mihael Zadravec at 01/05/07 19:12...
What would than be the right xslt transformation?
Is than the source code of a web document xml or xhtml?
Sorry for strange questions, but I am a bit confused :)
If it is convenient for you to handle your data as XML, you can use any
XML vocabulary
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:42:30AM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
What would than be the right xslt transformation?
It would depend on your desired input and output formats.
Is than the source code of a web document xml or xhtml?
Yes.
The document you start with would be XML, and
Actually it does... thank you. I am reading Myers book from Sitepoint
No Nonsense
XML Web Development With PHP and I needed to clear some thing out... So as
I see, in chapter 4. he explains how to generate website using xml and
php... and the final code presentet to browser is xhtml... so that is
Matthew Smith wrote:
Agreed. One can use the most obscure XML internally but, with the right
XSLT transformation, can turn it in to good XHTML (or even HTML).
M
Yuppers, or for us simple guys, (referring to myself and lack of
time/patience/knowledge), I use the magpie parser on php4, much
XML is a set of rules for building a language, it's not a language
itself, so it doesn't really make sense to send XML to the browser
without choosing a particular XML language.
XHTML, DocBook, RSS, TEI and XTM are just a few of the thousands of
XML-compliant languages. Some languages use
Hi Mihael,
On 5 Jan 2007 at 8:58, Mihael Zadravec wrote:
I started using xml for certain parts of my online applications...
Now, here is the question... If I would create a whole website using
xml, would it be standard compliant?
if you use Xml in the background and create Html using a
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:33:24PM +0100, Juergen Auer wrote:
Using Xml/Xsl allows a lot of things without PHP/Perl: The menu (all
filenames, link content, accesskey-definitions) is outsourced into a
single file. Its like a template - without any programming language.
XSL is a programming
On 5 Jan 2007 at 13:44, David Dorward wrote:
Client side XSLT isn't (generally) a great idea though. You do want
search engines to be able to read the menu, don't you?
All search engines and most of the browsers (all instead of IE6) get
the Html-Version. The Xml-Version is blocked by the
17 matches
Mail list logo
