[WSG] Alerting users upon page reloading
Hello everybody, I have a question: It is obvious that if users enter invalid data in forms, eg. user name and/or password, or email address, we should not automatically change or refresh the browser window without first alerting him/her that a change will occur and giving him/her the ability to disable or postpone the change. We added a title attribute to the submit button: Page will reload!, and when the page reloading, the user with be directed to that page part, before the label tag, and will get a error message too. For example, try to subscribe our newsletter with an invalid email address to see what I mean here: http://www.webnauts.net Does this solve the accessibility problem? Thanks in advance for your kind comments, or for your alternative solutions. Best, John -- John S. Britsios Web Architect Marketing Consultant Webnauts Net (Main Office) Koblenzer Str. 37A D-33613 Bielefeld Webnauts Net (U.S. Office) 5 Ivanhoe Drive Urbana IL 61802 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web address: http://www.webnauts.net ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Alerting users upon page reloading
John S. Britsios wrote: It is obvious that if users enter invalid data in forms, eg. user name and/or password, or email address, we should not automatically change or refresh the browser window without first alerting him/her that a change will occur and giving him/her the ability to disable or postpone the change. We added a title attribute to the submit button: Page will reload!, When a user activates a submit button, they expect that the page will be replaced. There is no need to notify them of such things. Guidelines about notifying users of page refreshes only applies to situations where it doesn't happen as a direct result of a user action. e.g. using meta refresh or JS to refresh the page after a time interval. and when the page reloading, the user with be directed to that page part, before the label tag, and will get a error message too. That's a good technique. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] Pixel Perfect
Hi all, I ran into something todat from a client I have never seen here or elsewhere. A client claiming there must be code errors because in making a pdf file of the site there are a couple of images out a few pixels, one considerably. Says clients need to be able to make nice copies of the site! The site is 100% error free in both code and css according to the w3c validator, no errors, no warnings on css. Has anyone ran into this? I have the tendency to tell the client to shop elsewhere Thanks Bruce Prochnau BKDesign Solutions -Unlimited Autoresponders Newsletters99.34% email delivered. Free support. http://bkdesign.aweber.com/ --- **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
The site is 100% error free in both code and css according to the w3c validator, no errors, no warnings on css. Has anyone ran into this? I have the tendency to tell the client to shop elsewhere Can we take a look to this site? -- Matteo Discardi 1802 http://homepage.mac.com/matteo.discardi Transcending History and the World, a tale of Soul and Swords eternally retold SoulCalibur ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
On 6/4/06, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I ran into something todat from a client I have never seen here or elsewhere. A client claiming there must be code errors because in making a pdf file of the site there are a couple of images out a few pixels, one considerably. Says clients need to be able to make nice copies of the site! Exactly how is the client generating PDFs? -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... portfolio.christianmontoya.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
2006-06-04
Thread
Marko Mihelcic - founder of mcville.net (http.//www.mcville.net)|(http://board.mcville.net)
yeah a URL would be great :D On 6/4/06, 1802 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The site is 100% error free in both code and css according to the w3c validator, no errors, no warnings on css. Has anyone ran into this? I have the tendency to tell the client to shop elsewhere Can we take a look to this site? -- Matteo Discardi 1802 http://homepage.mac.com/matteo.discardi Transcending History and the World, a tale of Soul and Swords eternally retold SoulCalibur ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Matteo wrote: Can we take a look to this site? Yes, it isn't perfect or done yet but is in process: http://66.118.191.85/~websterk/index.php Thanks Bruce Prochnau 1802 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 1:59 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect The site is 100% error free in both code and css according to the w3c validator, no errors, no warnings on css. Has anyone ran into this? I have the tendency to tell the client to shop elsewhere Can we take a look to this site? -- Matteo Discardi 1802 http://homepage.mac.com/matteo.discardi Transcending History and the World, a tale of Soul and Swords eternally retold SoulCalibur ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Bob McClelland wrote: When I print to acrobat distiller, the pdf is nothing like the web site! I wouldn't expect it to be actually, unless I'd provided a print style sheet. Did I miss it? I couldn't see one in there. Also Bruce, folk using IE with text size set to small will not be able to read a fair proportion of the text - it's miniscule! Sorry if you don't want to hear that - just trying to be helpful. ** Thanks for the feedback, I haven't added a print stylesheet yet, will soon though. I make print stylesheet for people to print the articles, not the entire page lol. Appreciate the font tip, hadn't noticed and will fix. I have no idea what she used to make site pdf, asked her... Bruce Prochnau bkdesign - Original Message - From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 2:37 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect Bruce wrote: Yes, it isn't perfect or done yet but is in process: http://66.118.191.85/~websterk/index.php Thanks Bruce Prochnau When I print to acrobat distiller, the pdf is nothing like the web site! I wouldn't expect it to be actually, unless I'd provided a print style sheet. Did I miss it? I couldn't see one in there. Also Bruce, folk using IE with text size set to small will not be able to read a fair proportion of the text - it's miniscule! Sorry if you don't want to hear that - just trying to be helpful. -- Best Regards, Bob McClelland Cornwall (UK) www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Im just going to echo what Bob said. Your site will not print properly because a) your site is fixed width and is not designed to scale with smaller display areas (such as the translated size of A4 paper), and b) you do not have any style sheet that applies to printed pages, so that the fixed width will be converted to a variable width site (ready for for document printing). My advise would be to add in a print style sheet, that a) converts the page to a variable width format and b) removes non-required elements such as redundant images, headers, navigation etc. Printing a site (or converting to pdf) is generally done to be able to view the content of the page they are after, not to have a duplicate paper copy of a website. Thanks, David. Designer wrote: Bruce wrote: Yes, it isn't perfect or done yet but is in process: http://66.118.191.85/~websterk/index.php Thanks Bruce Prochnau When I print to acrobat distiller, the pdf is nothing like the web site! I wouldn't expect it to be actually, unless I'd provided a print style sheet. Did I miss it? I couldn't see one in there. Also Bruce, folk using IE with text size set to small will not be able to read a fair proportion of the text - it's miniscule! Sorry if you don't want to hear that - just trying to be helpful. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Thanks for the feedback. I said: 1) The site isnt done yet. 2) The print stylesheet hasnt been added yet. I asked about pdf's actually, if anyone has been asked to have the entire site viewable as pdf and have it look perfect: Thanks bruce Prochnau - Original Message - From: David Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect Im just going to echo what Bob said. Your site will not print properly because a) your site is fixed width and is not designed to scale with smaller display areas (such as the translated size of A4 paper), and b) you do not have any style sheet that applies to printed pages, so that the fixed width will be converted to a variable width site (ready for for document printing). My advise would be to add in a print style sheet, that a) converts the page to a variable width format and b) removes non-required elements such as redundant images, headers, navigation etc. Printing a site (or converting to pdf) is generally done to be able to view the content of the page they are after, not to have a duplicate paper copy of a website. Thanks, David. Designer wrote: Bruce wrote: Yes, it isn't perfect or done yet but is in process: http://66.118.191.85/~websterk/index.php Thanks Bruce Prochnau When I print to acrobat distiller, the pdf is nothing like the web site! I wouldn't expect it to be actually, unless I'd provided a print style sheet. Did I miss it? I couldn't see one in there. Also Bruce, folk using IE with text size set to small will not be able to read a fair proportion of the text - it's miniscule! Sorry if you don't want to hear that - just trying to be helpful. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] pls help
heres the sample file http://w3fire.com//mockup/simms/thanks **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
entire site viewable as pdf But what does that mean exactly? Bruce, making PDF files from a site is done by printing it to a PDF writer, so it is dependent on the print style sheet most of the times. -- Jan Brasna :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com | www.wdnews.net ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] pls help
Leonard Salubayba wrote:
hi
i am having prob with my css layout pls help. i have a liquid layout
which is 90% in width, what i want is, when i minimize it and goes
below 800x600 res, i want it to stop there and instead have a
horizontal scrollbar. coz my div keeps dropping and it not good. pls
anyone help?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Try putting a min-width and min-height on it, of course you will need
to define max also just set that to your 90%, and for some reason in
opera, unless some else has a better idea, I've realized that you also
need to set a standard definition for it. I guess you could say
something like this
the_div {
width: XX;
height: XX;
max-width: XX;
max-height: XX;
min-width: 800px;
min-height: 600px;
}
Also for the scrollbar you can try adding an "overflow" to the CSS of
the div you want to have it.
and yes, I know that the W3C CSS Validator will say it is not valid as
you are using percentage and then pixel, but I am sure you can figure
out the percentage for 800x600.
Hope it was at least some help,
Shawn Cassick
Cassick_Designs
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] pls help
Hi Lenoard,Whilst the min-width, min-height will work in the likes of FireFox you will find that it does fall over in the likes of IE. I had a similar issue for a navigation toolbar for a client where 300 of their terminal users were on 800x600 max resolutions, although with the amount of navigation required around 840px space width. Wrapping the navigation wasnt an option so a div was placed just above with a 1px height and 840px width. This may sound very old fashioned (aka tables and spacers) but it does work. You could place either a spacer gif, or 2 more divs in your code that are 800px wide and 600px deep. With a depth/width of only 1px. That way you will force the scroll bars on the smaller monitors. Most likely 760 x 520 would be more appropriate to take into account that even 800x600 monitors dont have a true width of 800, and the height a little less to take into account users toolbars etc... Cheers **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Hi Bruce, You can use some application servers to generate PDF on the fly. I have used Coldfusion MX 7 server to generate PDF of HTML pages. See here for more info: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/coldfusion/video_tutorials.html I think .net has something similar too. Hope this helps. Steven On Monday, June 05, 2006, at 05:33AM, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the feedback. I said: 1) The site isnt done yet. 2) The print stylesheet hasnt been added yet. I asked about pdf's actually, if anyone has been asked to have the entire site viewable as pdf and have it look perfect: Thanks bruce Prochnau - Original Message - From: David Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect Im just going to echo what Bob said. Your site will not print properly because a) your site is fixed width and is not designed to scale with smaller display areas (such as the translated size of A4 paper), and b) you do not have any style sheet that applies to printed pages, so that the fixed width will be converted to a variable width site (ready for for document printing). My advise would be to add in a print style sheet, that a) converts the page to a variable width format and b) removes non-required elements such as redundant images, headers, navigation etc. Printing a site (or converting to pdf) is generally done to be able to view the content of the page they are after, not to have a duplicate paper copy of a website. Thanks, David. Designer wrote: Bruce wrote: Yes, it isn't perfect or done yet but is in process: http://66.118.191.85/~websterk/index.php Thanks Bruce Prochnau When I print to acrobat distiller, the pdf is nothing like the web site! I wouldn't expect it to be actually, unless I'd provided a print style sheet. Did I miss it? I couldn't see one in there. Also Bruce, folk using IE with text size set to small will not be able to read a fair proportion of the text - it's miniscule! Sorry if you don't want to hear that - just trying to be helpful. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Bruce,I haven't been asked this before - not in 10 years. Typically there's a requirement for a particular page(s) to be able to be saved as a PDF, but for that we provide dedicated specific functionality - using a server-side PDF generator. It's a reasonable request, though, and could be achieved using a print stylesheet (which I understand haven't been added yet), so you may want to ask the client for definite requirements in this regard. From the sounds of it the requirements aren't clear at this stage - there's no way I'd expect a Web page to create a perfect PDF without special consideration of that requirement up-front.CheersSteve On 05/06/06, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I ran into something todat from a client I have never seen here or elsewhere. A client claiming there must be code errors because in making a pdf file of the site there are a couple of images out a few pixels, one considerably. Says clients need to be able to make nice copies of the site! The site is 100% error free in both code and css according to the w3c validator, no errors, no warnings on css. Has anyone ran into this? I have the tendency to tell the client to shop elsewhere Thanks Bruce Prochnau-- --Steve 'Doc' Baty B.Sc (Maths), M.EC, MBA Director, User Experience StrategyRed SquareP: +612 8289 4930M: +61 417 061 292Member, UPA - www.upassoc.orgMember, IxDA - www.ixda.org Member, Web Standards Group - www.webstandardsgroup.org **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] pls help
Leonard Salubayba wrote: hi i am having prob with my css layout pls help. i have a liquid layout which is 90% in width, what i want is, when i minimize it and goes below 800x600 res, i want it to stop there and instead have a horizontal scrollbar. coz my div keeps dropping and it not good. pls anyone help? Stu Nicholls has a min-width solution for Internet Explorer on Windows. It does require you to put IE in quirks mode however, so may or may not be appropriate to your needs. See here: http://www.cssplay.co.uk/boxes/minwidth.html Cordially, David -- David Hucklesby, on 6/4/2006 http://www.hucklesby.com/ -- ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Hi Bruce, Bruce wrote on 04-06-2006: I asked about a client recreating a site as a pdf, and having that expected, the entire site, and if anyone has had that requested as I have never been asked to have that. Maybe not exactly a match, but I have had problems where a client wanted the website, including navigation bars etc... in the printed output, and images printing at different scales to the online version... The problems were (as far as I recall) limited to background images, and only manifest in Firefox on Mac, where they printed larger than the live webpage. I thought it was related to the dpi of the images, so fixed that and still got the same problem. Changing the background image for printing was also not a solution because all other browsers I tried were consistent with the sizing of background images, whether live page or printed... even firefox on PC got it 'right'. I remain baffled. Maybe it helps shed some light... Best regards Rob ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] AJAX Question
Good Evening WSG,I have been exploring AJAX and wondered if I could achieve the same result of retrieving data from XML documents locally from a directory but without the requirment of a HTTP Server to serve up the page. I am intriguied of the idea of developing a web application that could be used locally without the requirement of a HTTP server.Could anyone help me please think of a method to which this is possible?Thanks WSG, **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] pls help
Leonard Salubayba wrote:
hey guys thanks for the help (shawn,
davi, stephen) ill try to do what you have suggested, i just woke up
hope this will work, thanks ill give you updates
-
Original Message -
From:
Shawn Cassick
To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent:
Sunday, June 04, 2006 2:42 PM
Subject:
Re: [WSG] pls help
Leonard Salubayba wrote:
hi i am having prob with my css layout pls help. i have a
liquid layout which is 90% in width, what i want is, when i minimize it
and goes below 800x600 res, i want it to stop there and instead have a
horizontal scrollbar. coz my div keeps dropping and it not good. pls
anyone help?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Try putting a min-width and min-height on it, of course you will need
to define max also just set that to your 90%, and for some reason in
opera, unless some else has a better idea, I've realized that you also
need to set a standard definition for it. I guess you could say
something like this
the_div {
width: XX;
height: XX;
max-width: XX;
max-height: XX;
min-width: 800px;
min-height: 600px;
}
Also for the scrollbar you can try adding an "overflow" to the CSS of
the div you want to have it.
and yes, I know that the W3C CSS Validator will say it is not valid as
you are using percentage and then pixel, but I am sure you can figure
out the percentage for 800x600.
Hope it was at least some help,
Shawn Cassick
Cassick_Designs
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
good luck man, let us now.
Shawn Cassick
Cassick_Designs
**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Hi Steven, You wrote: I have used Coldfusion MX 7 server to generate PDF of HTML pages. ... I think .net has something similar too. I just came from checking for info on the site of one of our fine commercial enterprises that was, it seems, generated by .net. After not being able to successfully click on any of the apparent link icons, I checked the page source and it was a mess in regard to standards. The page markup had a nasty inline JavaScript line above the DOCTYPE, no URI in the DOCTYPE, JavaScript in the head, a call to an external JS in the head, and JavaScript in the body. I finally found the information I wanted in a .pdf that I had to magnify to be able to bring the tiny type up out of pixel hell. My impression is that the .net way is not a nice way to go if you want standards-based markup. -- Regards, Gene Falck [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Adobe Acrobat has the ability to capture a website as a pdf documentWhen I last used it with Acrobat 4 in about 2001, it's rendering engine then was quite different to other browsers at the time (IE5 and NN4.7). The differences that your client is seeing is probably due to differences in rendering engine. ie the Adobe engine is not standard compliant.My advice, show your client how to capture her website using tools other than Adobe Acrobat. -- Nick Cowiehttp://nickcowie.com **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect
Nick Cowie wrote: When I last used it with Acrobat 4 in about 2001, it's rendering engine then was quite different to other browsers at the time (IE5 and NN4.7). The differences that your client is seeing is probably due to differences in rendering engine. ie the Adobe engine is not standard compliant. My advice, show your client how to capture her website using tools other than Adobe Acrobat. ** Actually I just heard back from her: I have a button in both Mozilla and IE where I just click convert to PDF (I have the full version of Acrobat Pro). It works for 95% of web sites and it's how I save web pages. I also can usually print a reasonable rendition of a page directly in IE or Firefox so I was curious why it gets so jumbled on my web site... Now that the shock has worn off lol...it isn't unrealistic to ask to have the site render nicely as a pdf, but it certainly threw me for a loop. I did inform her it would be looked into last, and may cost extra depending on the work involved, as there certainly was no agreement to have it look nice as a pdf! lol On the group here I have heard it don't look right in ie, in firefox, in whateverbut never have I seen, it doesn't render right as a pdf!!! I suppose, on reflection, this isn't really a standards related post as I have the main page valid as css and xhtmldunno... However; Quote: The differences that your client is seeing is probably due to differences in rendering engine. ie the Adobe engine is not standard compliant. Is great info!!! Thanks all bruce Prochnau bkdesign ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] AJAX Question
You might have better luck asking on a forum dedicated to _javascript_ or AJAX rather then web standards. -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omen King Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 1:34 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] AJAX Question Well I was hoping if there was some way this was already supported by _javascript_, But if it were to be another client side programming other than _javascript_ than C++. On 6/4/06, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/4/06, Omen King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good Evening WSG, I have been exploring AJAX and wondered if I could achieve the same result of retrieving data from XML documents locally from a directory but without the requirment of a HTTP Server to serve up the page. I am intriguied of the idea of developing a web application that could be used locally without the requirement of a HTTP server. Could anyone help me please think of a method to which this is possible? Client side programming? Java or C++? -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... portfolio.christianmontoya.com ** The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
Re: [WSG] AJAX Question
hmmm, this is true Samuel.I shall search for a community for AJAX, good Idea.ThanksOn 6/4/06, Samuel Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might have better luck asking on a forum dedicated to _javascript_ or AJAX rather then web standards. -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:listdad@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Omen King Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 1:34 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] AJAX Question Well I was hoping if there was some way this was already supported by _javascript_, But if it were to be another client side programming other than _javascript_ than C++. On 6/4/06, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/4/06, Omen King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good Evening WSG, I have been exploring AJAX and wondered if I could achieve the same result of retrieving data from XML documents locally from a directory but without the requirment of a HTTP Server to serve up the page. I am intriguied of the idea of developing a web application that could be used locally without the requirement of a HTTP server. Could anyone help me please think of a method to which this is possible? Client side programming? Java or C++? -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... portfolio.christianmontoya.com ** The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** **The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
