Can anyone recommend the best place to get the
latest standalone IE7? I've downloaded it from Evolt and a few other places and
it just seems to crash after a couple of clicks.
Would appreciate your help.
Paul
***List
I use the one found here: http://tredosoft.com/IE7_standalone
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:43:00 +1000, Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can anyone recommend the best place to get the latest standalone IE7?
I've downloaded it from Evolt and a few other places and it just seems
to crash
Hi all,
anyone know a good site/piece of software you can
get to check your whole site for validation errors? Would speed things up
instead of having to do them one at a time. Another bonus would be one that
accepts password information on protected sites.
Cheers
Paul
CSE HTML Validator Pro.
www.htmlvalidator.com
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Paul Collins
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:17 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Validate multiple (X)HTML pages
Hi all,
anyone know a good site/piece of software you can get to check your
whole site for validation errors?
http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/
Another bonus would be one that accepts password information on protected sites.
If you need some sort of private use, you might try to compile W3C
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Dorward
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:36 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Validate multiple (X)HTML pages
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 11:27:19AM +0200, Roberto
anyone know a good site/piece of software you can get to
check your whole site for validation errors?
I use 'A Real Validator' (http://arealvalidator.com/) and local
installations (inside our corporate firewall) of the W3C's validator and
the WDG HTML Validator.
Regards,
Sean.
The WDG validator can work recursively:
http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/
I was going to suggest the WDG as well. The online version's limit is 100
pages I think.
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 11:53:31AM +0200, Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote:
Are u sure?
http://www.htmlvalidator.com/htmlval/v80/docs/index.html?validate_to_w3c_sta
ndards.htm
Looks like they've built a validator in to it since I last looked
... but it also looks like it doesn't run by default.
Paul Collins wrote:
Hi all,
anyone know a good site/piece of software you can get to check your
whole site for validation errors? Would speed things up instead of
having to do them one at a time. Another bonus would be one that
accepts password information on protected sites.
Cheers
Paul
Olá!
morten fjellman wrote:
Hi list,
I need to set a few values in my stylesheet that only Safari should
read. I've read the article on Gunlaug.no http://Gunlaug.no
(http://www.gunlaug.no/homesite/main_8_1.html
http://www.gunlaug.no/homesite/main_8_1.html) but I don't quite get
it. Can
Roberto Gorjão wrote:
http://castelosnoar.com/cna_blog/?p=38lp_lang_view=en
An alternative would be to make a backup image of your main hard disk,
just in case something goes wrong, and install IE7 over IE6 and have
this one running as a standalone instead.
I can't recommend Microsofts
Rahul,
As it was said before (I don't remember if it was in this list),
although Virtual PC is free now, OSs for it aren't. Besides RAM you also
need quite a lot of disk space, if you want to have several versions of
IE working as they should, each in his own Virtual PC instance. Please
Title: Re: [WSG] How do I set a css-value for Safari alone?
On 9/25/06 6:49 AM, morten fjellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll use the hash hack for now
Can this be escaped? I am guessing then that this should be at the bottom of a sheet because all styles after the hash will be ignored
As it was said before (I don't remember if it was in this list),
although Virtual PC is free now, OSs for it aren't. Besides RAM you
also need quite a lot of disk space, if you want to have several
versions of IE working as they should, each in his own Virtual PC
instance. Please correct me if
Hi Phillip.
I did try out your Nikita site last week, which is
what prompted me to seek out a site where I can get all my pages done at
once.
I thought the service was great, I would say the
two drawbacks were the password thing and the wait for my results. I guess I
generally want to get
Morten,
As much as I can see, your problem is due to the fact that you've sized
your input field by the html size attribute: input type=text
size=38 name=text id=input_tv2_marked
I see no CSS rules for this input field. If you do something as follows,
your problem will be most probably
Yes Lachlan, I seem to be having the same problem.
Not sure why, it could be cause I have several other Browsers open at the same
time, however all my other standalones work together. Maybe it's got to do with
the version of XP I am running?
- Original Message -
From:
Thanks to everyone for your replies. I have our
tech manager on the case here to sort out the W3C one locally, in the meantime I
will use the WDG one, which seems to work fine, except on password protected
sites.
Cheers,Paul
As much as I can see, your problem is due to the fact that you've sizedyour input field by the html size attribute: input type=text
size=38 name=text id=input_tv2_marked
I see no CSS rules for this input field. If you do something as follows,your problem will be most probably solved without the
The WDG validator can work recursively:
http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/
... although I think it has a depth limit (you could install a local
copy and remove that limit though.
My little Problem with it, is that it moans about the XHTML DTD:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 08:54:16AM -0600, Niels Fr?hling wrote:
The WDG validator can work recursively:
http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/
My little Problem with it, is that it moans about the XHTML DTD:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd, line 237,
character 28:
Paul Collins wrote:
Hi all,
anyone know a good site/piece of software you can get to check your
whole site for validation errors? Would speed things up instead of
having to do them one at a time. Another bonus would be one that accepts
password information on protected sites.
Cheers
Paul
Hi All,
Back from holiday in Portugal - yes thank you, wonderful.
Anyway - is there a way of adding the 3 necessary filters below to give
my div an 'opaque' background without invalidating my CSS? I'd like a
hack free method if possible but if not, - all comments very welcome.
Thanks,
Max.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 04:12:22PM +0100, John 'Max' Maxwell wrote:
Anyway - is there a way of adding the 3 necessary filters below to give
my div an 'opaque' background without invalidating my CSS?
If you use non-standard properties, then your CSS can't be
valid.
--
David Dorward
hello,this is my 1st post here, hope i can help you.i run on ubuntu linux and for web development i use several VMware virtual machines. you can download vmware server for free (
http://www.vmware.com/download/server/) and create several windows xp (or whatever you prefer). you can install vmware
David Dorward wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 04:12:22PM +0100, John 'Max' Maxwell wrote:
Anyway - is there a way of adding the 3 necessary filters below to give
my div an 'opaque' background without invalidating my CSS?
If you use non-standard properties, then your
I'm happily using these two:
http://hvge.sk/scripts/fshl/
http://qbnz.com/highlighter/
--
Jan Brasna :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com | www.wdnews.net
***
List Guidelines:
The WDG validator can work recursively:
http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/
My little Problem with it, is that it moans about the XHTML DTD:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd, line 237,
character 28: omitted tag minimization parameter can be omitted only
if
I am thinking about what would be the best way to do syntax highlighting
of PHP-code.
If one considers how PHP:s own syntax highlight function works, it
produces a mess of inline-styles (or font-tags for the poor ones still
doing PHP 4). See http://se.php.net/highlight_string
See also
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 11:55:21AM -0600, Niels Fr?hling wrote:
!DOCTYPE html
PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//ES
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
EN is the language the DTD is written in, not the the document. That
Doctype is just wrong.
html
The only other way (in my scenario) is to add a transparent image 'over'
the background to line up with the div - but this is a bit of a
'fudge' and
seems a shame when there is code to do the job.
Do you know why it isn't valid?
No idea. Opera and Safari support the CSS3 recommendation,
On 25 Sep 2006, at 18:55, Niels Fröhling wrote:
This is my header:
!DOCTYPE html
PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//ES
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=es lang=es
No, it _is_ the //ES, why is that? Any
!DOCTYPE html
PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//ES
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
EN is the language the DTD is written in, not the the document. That
Doctype is just wrong.
Hmm, what's the difference? ENTITY being ENTIDAD?
I guess it's some left-over
Hi There,
I have just finished validating a layout - www.project.ex16.co.uk and
used the tools in the firefox toolbar to check it - all ok on XHTML, CSS
and WAI. The first two give you links to use for your VALID! gifs etc
but not the third - is there a protocol to follow here?
Thanks,
Hi all
I am playing with mod_rewrite to make user/SE friendly urls of a
database driven website.
I have noticed that CMSs like WordPress (I'm *not* using WP for this
project) make use of absolute urls, and that someone on WP's forum
mentioned that absolute urls are important for RSS feeds.
I
Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
I'd be interested in what many of you feel is best practice in the use
of the following, in combination:
1. User/SE friendly urls
(eg http://www.domain.com/folder/1/3/ as opposed to
http://www.domain.com/folder/index.php?$a=1amp;$b=3)
Looks more professional, easier
On 9/25/06, Sarah Peeke (XERT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I am playing with mod_rewrite to make user/SE friendly urls of a
database driven website.
...
I'd be interested in what many of you feel is best practice in the use
of the following, in combination:
1. User/SE friendly urls
(eg
Sarah Peeke wrote:
Is it true that RSS requires the use of absolute urls?
Hello Sarah,
Required I don't know, but I always use absolute URLs within my posts so
users who get the whole post can follow any included local links without
having to actually come to the site. I do the same with
Hi Patrick
Thanks for your reply.
I'd avoid the ../ shenanigans, as that makes your directories less
portable
OK, I can see how this works on a remote server.
/ for home page
/images/1.jpg for image folder located in root
etc
But how do I then maintain this same file structure on my
Rob
I won't have a chance to try this until later in the week, but many
thanks for the detailed explanation.
I'll let you know how it goes.
PS I assume this works OK with Tiger?
Much appreciated
Sarah :)
--
XERT Communications
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mobile: 0438 017 416
Peter Firminger wrote on 26-09-2006:
Ok, we're getting way OT now... Please take this discussion off list.
Oops... consider it done, and apologies one and all.
Rob
***
List Guidelines:
42 matches
Mail list logo
