RE: [WSG] WebSite Feedback !

Thanks for the link? It's on the bottom of every post! If you have some help for Marvin, please feel free to continue this thread. If not, THE END. p *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscrib

RE: [WSG] WebSite Feedback

I'm referring to normal emails, not listserve type emails like this one. Thanks for the link, however. Eric -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Montoya Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 10:31 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup

Re: [WSG] Header Image Alignment[solved]

On Nov 25, 2006, at 8:18 AM, CK wrote: Hi, Having issues getting the header BG to align as desired: Here is the current rendering: It's probably simple, please scold if some basi

Re: [WSG] WebSite Feedback

It's far better than advertising in your email signature. On 11/25/06, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/25/06, Tee G. Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 4) people who uses hotmail or other webmail services and is innocent > > like Marvin but being accused by you On 11/25

Re: [WSG] WebSite Feedback

On 11/25/06, Eric Colley - GoldSpace.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hate it when people trim their message in reply. I'm constantly getting emails from people with some quick answer in response to something, and I have no idea what they are referring to, because they delete the previous text

RE: [WSG] WebSite Feedback

I hate it when people trim their message in reply. I'm constantly getting emails from people with some quick answer in response to something, and I have no idea what they are referring to, because they delete the previous text from the email. I think it is a bad idea to trim emails like that. Jus

Re: [WSG] WebSite Feedback

On 11/25/06, Tee G. Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4) people who uses hotmail or other webmail services and is innocent > like Marvin but being accused by you On 11/25/06, James Crooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Everyone should use Gmail, it would solve annoyances 1 to 4. Actually, t

Re: [WSG] WebSite Feedback

Everyone should use Gmail, it would solve annoyances 1 to 4. but then we get a new annoyance, invariably. people who post two or three times because they're not seeing their initial message from gMail. I vote for "just be tolerant". best Donna On 11/25/06, Tee G. Peng <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [WSG] WebSite Feedback

Everyone should use Gmail, it would solve annoyances 1 to 4. On 11/25/06, Tee G. Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 22, 2006, at 3:36 AM, Luke wrote: > I would like to remind you that there is a advertisement in you e-mail > signature. Your message implied that the message from Marvin wa

Re: [WSG] Forms in XHTML 1.1

On 11/25/06, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And don't forget -- it is, after all, designed to hold form elements. Almost - it is designed to group collections of form elements together, usually because they are related to aid comprehension of the form. ***

[WSG] Header Image Alignment

Hi, Having issues getting the header BG to align as desired: Here is the current rendering: It's probably simple, please scold if some basic rule has been forgotten. "Free

Re: [WSG] Forms in XHTML 1.1

On 11/24/06, CK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've "googled" without results for the following question why is >> necessary to place select elements in a or other block level >> element in order to validate as XHMTL 1.1? >Because *all* inline elements must be inside a *block* level elem

Re: [WSG] WebSite Feedback

On Nov 22, 2006, at 3:36 AM, Luke wrote: I would like to remind you that there is a advertisement in you e-mail signature. Your message implied that the message from Marvin was a disguise and that his true intention was to advertise some service. FIY, webmails like Yahoo, hotmail, MSN and

[WSG] Petition (Particularly for UK members)

As an advocate of web standards, and following the introduction of the Disability Discrimination Act in the UK, I believe that UK Government should at least adhere to the standards which they in theory enforce. If in agreement and you wish to endorse a petition to remind them of their obligations

Re: [WSG] Forms in XHTML 1.1

On Nov 24, 2006, at 23:10 PM, Matthew Pennell wrote: On 11/25/06, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Because *all* inline elements must be inside a *block* level element But a form IS a block-level element. The more accurate answer would be "because that's what the DTD says". It's