I will be out of the office starting 30/01/2007 and will not return until
06/02/2007.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of the Queensland Departmen
On 2/1/07, Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting how people today still either get Picasso or they don't. Says a
lot about the timelessness of the work...
Well, list-admin said we have to get back on topic, so I'm still
wondering if Milosz will share his definition of "accessible."
Othe
Interesting how people today still either get Picasso or they
don't. Says a lot about the timelessness of the work...
Noah
PerthWebDesigns.com
Quoting Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
some of it makes sense (like self portraits etc) but a lot of his
sculptures and other stuf
ADMIN - THREAD MOVING OFF TOPIC
This thread is fast becoming off-topic, or at least, off focus. If you wish
to post to the thread, please keep it focussed and constructive.
Thanks
Russ
Admin
***
List Guidelines: http://webstand
some of it makes sense (like self portraits etc) but a lot of his sculptures
and other stuff doesnt, it went agaisnt the grain of normal painting etc of his
era
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/02/2007 10:14:18 am >>>
On 2/1/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You look at people like Piac
Picasso's art did make sense, that is why he is famous now. Simple
lines.
If Picasso were making webpages they would all be accessible.
This comparison of genius with self indulgent art for arts sake is
annoying.
Tim
On 02/02/2007, at 1:05 PM, Jermayn Parker wrote:
You look at people like
On 2/1/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You look at people like Piacoso and his art made no sense and it was popular
and so are these types of website, make no sense but are popular (myspace
another example)
I have no idea what you are talking about. Picasso's art makes total
sen
You look at people like Piacoso and his art made no sense and it was popular
and so are these types of website, make no sense but are popular (myspace
another example)
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/02/2007 9:56:49 am >>>
Why would you want to create such an image gallery for navigation, no
rollove
Why would you want to create such an image gallery for navigation, no
rollover titles, no idea where each link goes, uses a lot of images for
a text based navigation system, maybe it is art but not much else.
Tim
On 02/02/2007, at 6:00 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christian Montoya
- Original Message -
From: jonnysoco
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Art and accessibility - my opinion ;)
http://jrgraphix.net/research/flash_dock.php
Awesome! Thank you.
Jeff
**
Oh yes. You can choose to have the icons bigger or smaller, and the
animation on or off. And the animation relates to the size of the icons -
smaller icons = smaller animation.
You can also have them not visible at all until you put your cursor right at
the bottom of the screen (or wherever the do
Matthew Smith wrote:
> Ah, that's what a Mac dock looks like; haven't seen a Mac for about
> eight years. Eeeew! The animation nearly made me seasick ;-) Do Macs
> have a means of turning the animation off for those (like me) who cannot
> tolerate screen motion?
Yes. And you can adjust the d
Quoth jonnysoco at 02/02/07 09:41...
http://jrgraphix.net/research/flash_dock.php
Ah, that's what a Mac dock looks like; haven't seen a Mac for about
eight years. Eeeew! The animation nearly made me seasick ;-) Do Macs
have a means of turning the animation off for those (like me) who cann
http://jrgraphix.net/research/flash_dock.php
On 2/1/07, Susie Gardner-Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/2/07 5:00 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> At the bottom of this site: http://www.mandchou.com/ - there is an image
> gallery in Flash used for navigation.
On 2/2/07 5:00 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> At the bottom of this site: http://www.mandchou.com/ - there is an image
> gallery in Flash used for navigation. Can someone point me to a tutorial for
> creating this?
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff
No idea but you might tr
Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer wrote:
Christian in your opinion - those sites are inaccessible... without
any argues I cannot agree so that's why I've asked...
I define 'accessible' as "be given access". In normal terms that means
that if one access-point is closed to particular visito
On Feb 1, 2007, at 12:06 PM, Rob O'Rourke wrote:
Accessibility is making a site available and usable to the widest
possible audience, on as many user agents as possible. A lot of the
sites you've picked are pure flash, while these can be made
somewhat accessible (e.g. making the text sel
Milosz - Your site's opening page took almost three minutes to load on a
dialup connection... b'bye.
I gave up trying to view sites after three successive 'you need flash'
notices... b'bye.
Judging by what I (finally) saw on your opening page I would guess that
the listed pages are quite beautifu
Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer wrote:
Christian in your opinion - those sites are inaccessible... without
any argues
I cannot agree so that's why I've asked...
Accessibility is making a site available and usable to the widest
possible audience, on as many user agents as possible. A
Christian in your opinion - those sites are inaccessible... without any
argues
I cannot agree so that's why I've asked...
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lodowski
Art Director IceAge Design Squadron
Be our Ally, Hire our Guns...: www.iceagedesign.co.uk
London
Visit my PriveFolio: www.lodowski.eu - Be my G
On 2/1/07, Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do you define "accessible" ?
pure text ?
Not fair. You picked these sites, so you have to define your criteria.
The ball is in your court to answer that question.
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.net .. d
Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/1/07, Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to present you the list of best100 e-motional designs,
> > we're waiting for your opinions about our idea and choice ;)
> >
> > http://www.e-motionaldesig
Duck ? Bob - I don't think so...
There is a large difference between the word "design/designer" and
"code/coder",
designer and design are connected with the pure art with a support of
usability - code - that's only accesibility...
but of course - that's only my opinion...
Best Wishes
Milosz A
How do you define "accessible" ?
pure text ?
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lodowski
Art Director IceAge Design Squadron
Be our Ally, Hire our Guns...: www.iceagedesign.co.uk
London
Visit my PriveFolio: www.lodowski.eu - Be my Guest!
Mobile contact: +44 079.23.388.905 (UK)
Ice - e-Motional Design Expert
Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer wrote:
I'd like to present you the list of best100 e-motional designs,
we're waiting for your opinions about our idea and choice ;)
http://www.e-motionaldesign.com/blog/100-the-best-e-motional-websites-part-1-of-4/
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lodowski
Art Di
On 2/1/07, Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to present you the list of best100 e-motional designs,
we're waiting for your opinions about our idea and choice ;)
http://www.e-motionaldesign.com/blog/100-the-best-e-motional-websites-part-1-of-4/
So, a bu
I'd like to present you the list of best100 e-motional designs,
we're waiting for your opinions about our idea and choice ;)
http://www.e-motionaldesign.com/blog/100-the-best-e-motional-websites-part-1-of-4/
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lodowski
Art Director IceAge Design Squadron
Be our Ally, Hire our
Thanks Mitch, it also appears that the body element must have a child
node that is of an Element type. A "text node" won't suffice, and for
that matter I can't think of a use-case whereby the body would contain
just text. Thanks again.
It will suffice with Transitional DTD.
Regards,
Rimantas
-
On 02/02/07, Mitchell Essex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Serdar,
The problem is that the 'minimal document' is too minimal add a title within
the head tag and something within the body then it should validate fine.
The "errors": relate to the not finished
Another possibility is that
I'm trying to understand why the w3 validator believe's the following
minimal document is invalid:
There are two "errors":
1. Line 5 column 6: end tag for "HEAD" which is not finished
2. Line 8 column 6: end tag for "BODY" which is not finished.
That's not minimal document. This one is:
Also, try http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd";>
as a doctype
2007/2/1, Serdar Kılıç <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm trying to understand why the w3 validator believe's the following
minimal document is invalid:
There are two "errors":
1. Line 5 column 6: end tag for "HEAD" which is not fi
Hi Serdar,
the validator is right.
1. Line 5 column 6: end tag for "HEAD" which is not finished
The HEAD element requires a TITLE element:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-HEAD
2. Line 8 column 6: end tag for "BODY" which is not finished.
The BODY element requires BL
your body and head tags are empty -- it's now valid obviously...
2007/2/1, Serdar Kılıç <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm trying to understand why the w3 validator believe's the following
minimal document is invalid:
There are two "errors":
1. Line 5 column 6: end tag for "HEAD" which is not f
Serdar,
The problem is that the 'minimal document' is too minimal add a title within
the head tag and something within the body then it should validate fine.
The "errors": relate to the not finished
Another possibility is that you used an element which requires a child
element that
I'm trying to understand why the w3 validator believe's the following
minimal document is invalid:
There are two "errors":
1. Line 5 column 6: end tag for "HEAD" which is not finished
2. Line 8 column 6: end tag for "BODY" which is not finished.
--
Cheers,
Serdar Kilic
http://weblog.kil
Hi Guys,
It was my event - Search Summit.
There will be an email going out about the WSG discount, but feel free
in contacting me if you have any questions.
Ricky, the reason i set up this business in the 1st place was that SER
was such a shitty conference.
Cheers
Barry
0403 060 209 or 02
36 matches
Mail list logo
