Re: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas

2006-11-03 Thread Barney Carroll
Andreas, you elucidate what I mean pretty well. Christian - I know it's a shame that the only way I could express myself somehow makes standardistas look bad through implication. I don't want to give that idea at all. As for naming and shaming, I object to the notion strongly. The kind of

Re: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas

2006-11-03 Thread Christian Montoya
On 11/3/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas, you elucidate what I mean pretty well. Christian - I know it's a shame that the only way I could express myself somehow makes standardistas look bad through implication. I don't want to give that idea at all. As for naming and shaming,

Re: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas [WAS: Articles/reasearch/experience of screen readers]

2006-11-02 Thread Christian Montoya
On 11/2/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am a css-enthusiastic web designer who sees the value of standards as a concept but does not necessarily bow to baseless trends, and more and more I see potentially brilliant ideas get shot down in the community because of 'standards' zealots

Re: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas

2006-11-02 Thread Tony Crockford
Christian Montoya wrote: Otherwise I will just have to keep on assuming that these specters don't exist. There are one or two font-size fanatics that will accuse you of not respecting your users if you feel the need to set a font size other than default. does that count?

Re: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas

2006-11-02 Thread Rob O'Rourke
Tony Crockford wrote: Christian Montoya wrote: Otherwise I will just have to keep on assuming that these specters don't exist. There are one or two font-size fanatics that will accuse you of not respecting your users if you feel the need to set a font size other than default. does that

Re: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas

2006-11-02 Thread Christian Montoya
On 11/2/06, Tony Crockford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christian Montoya wrote: Otherwise I will just have to keep on assuming that these specters don't exist. There are one or two font-size fanatics that will accuse you of not respecting your users if you feel the need to set a font size other

Re: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas

2006-11-02 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Christian Montoya wrote: On 11/2/06, Tony Crockford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are one or two font-size fanatics that will accuse you of not respecting your users if you feel the need to set a font size other than default. As an example of the kind of empty talk I'm tired of, yes. That

RE: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas

2006-11-02 Thread Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media]
-Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Montoya Sent: Friday, 3 November 2006 9:24 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas There are one or two font-size fanatics that will accuse

Re: [WSG] Rotten Standardistas

2006-11-02 Thread Felix Miata
On 2006/11/02 23:46 (GMT) Patrick H. Lauke apparently typed: Christian Montoya wrote Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:24:29 -0500: On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:26:25 +, Tony Crockford wrote: There are one or two font-size fanatics that will accuse you of not respecting your users if you feel the need to