Re: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

2008-02-06 Thread Bill Williamson
By while it is vmotion do you mean While we are actively moving it between physical VM hosts ? If so what did you expect? If not, we need more details. VMotion is what lets you reallocate a live running VM in a VMWare cluster from one physical host to another, while running against their

RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

2008-02-06 Thread Aaron Saikovski
: RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion What did I expect? Hmm maybe that the point of this email as I'm not a ESX, VMWare or V-Motion expert? I sort out other people who may have the knowledge to help me provide a solution. As I've never dealt with SharePoint in an environment using V-Motion! So now, I

RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

2008-02-05 Thread Aaron Saikovski
Have they got SP1 installed? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2008 10:03 AM To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion Hi all, We currently have a client who has a virtual SharePoint environment.

RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

2008-02-05 Thread Daniel Brown
: RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion Hi Aaron, No, the server does not have SP1 applied. Cheers, DB From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Saikovski Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2008 10:01 AM To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

2008-02-05 Thread Aaron Saikovski
Yup WSS/MOSS sp1 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2008 11:32 AM To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion Whoops, I take it you mean MOSS SP1? If so, my previous email is correct, they do

RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

2008-02-05 Thread Dave Porter
I have seen several issues with MOSS when you virtualize SQL. It is not recommended. You can virtualize the WFE's, but I have not seen SQL do well in a virtual environment. What are the specs on the virtual environment? Dave P. Subject: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-MotionDate: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:03:08

RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

2008-02-05 Thread Sezai KOMUR
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Porter Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2008 1:55 PM To: listserver@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion I have seen several issues with MOSS when you virtualize SQL. It is not recommended. You can virtualize the WFE's, but I

RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

2008-02-05 Thread Hodges, Kristen
To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion This isn't the first time I have heard bad things about running SQL Server virtualised in general. A few people I have met swear that it should be avoided, something about the rate at which SQL Server needs to read and write from

RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion

2008-02-05 Thread Dave Porter
://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/archive/2007/01/05/virtual-server-2005-r2-support-for-wss-3-0-and-moss-2007.aspx From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:12:34 +0900Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] MOSS V-Motion This isn’t the first time I have heard bad things about running SQL Server