Re: [Littlesnitch-talk] Little Snitch 1.2.1 Security Update

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Kissner
Mmmh, ok. And what measure have you chosen against a program to just remove LittleSnitch from the startup list Not too sure what you mean, what programs are likely to do that? trojan horses, malware of any kind ... regards martin ___

Re: [Littlesnitch-talk] Little Snitch 1.2.1 Security Update

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Kissner
trojan horses, malware of any kind ... Do they run on their own, do they need to be run and do they need permission? Trojans are usually run by the user and do harmful operations in the background, but a trojan could also install Login Items. Of course they need permissions - When run by

Re: [Littlesnitch-talk] Little Snitch 1.2.1 Security Update

2005-10-25 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25 Oct 2005, at 12:40, Martin Kissner wrote: Trojans are usually run by the user In that case I'm the only user on here. Having used Windows for the past 100 years or so I'm reasonably well gened up on what to and what not to run. For

Re: [Littlesnitch-talk] Little Snitch 1.2.1 Security Update

2005-10-25 Thread Saad Kadhi
On Oct 25, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Tony Boom wrote: Am I right in thinking for LS to be compromised I, as the soul user of this Mac, have to specifically give permission and run rogue software? That's wrong. Malware may innoculate your system using an authorized application such as your browser

Re: [Littlesnitch-talk] Little Snitch 1.2.1 Security Update

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Kissner
Hi Tony, Trojans are usually run by the user I have a hardware firewall in my router and the apple firewall but neither allow full control over attempted outgoing connections. Well, actually the apple firewall (and probably also the firewall in your router) allows you full control over

Re: [Littlesnitch-talk] Little Snitch 1.2.1 Security Update

2005-10-24 Thread Tony Boom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24 Oct 2005, at 20:22, LittleSnitch Support wrote: * Little Snitch protects itself against forced termination (kill) now. Last login: Mon Oct 24 21:41:18 on console Welcome to Darwin! tony-booms-imac:~ tony$ top tony-booms-imac:~ tony$

Re: [Littlesnitch-talk] Little Snitch 1.2.1 Security Update

2005-10-24 Thread Joachim Schmitz
Dear Tony, you wrote: * Little Snitch protects itself against forced termination (kill) now. Last login: Mon Oct 24 21:41:18 on console Welcome to Darwin! tony-booms-imac:~ tony$ top tony-booms-imac:~ tony$ kill 236 - -bash: kill: (236) - Operation not permitted