On 06/04/13 17:41, Hamish wrote:
oing back to the
osgeo web page overview for GRASS, it is likely
last edited some years ago, but it's all still
relevant. So "last edited ~2009" would look abandoned
but in this case unjustly, & so better to say nothing
about it at all?
I agree with Hamish, better
Bob wrote:
> I was thinking more along the lines of a for
> information item, that showed the last edit of the
> particular overview. Very similar to a version of
> overview I guess.
>
> Based on the conversation here, it sounded like a
> version could be used on more than one LiveDVD,
> without b
Cameron,
I was thinking more along the lines of a for information item, that showed the
last edit of the particular overview. Very similar to a version of overview I
guess. Based on the conversation here, it sounded like a version could be used
on more than one LiveDVD, without being changed
On 5/04/2013 1:34 AM, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) wrote:
Should the Overviews each have a ”last edited” date attached to them
(that can be seen in the overview)? Might be easier to update things
between versions of Live DVDs.
Bob, we ensure that ALL OSGeo-Live project overviews are up to dat
All,
Should the Overviews each have a ”last edited” date attached to them (that can
be seen in the overview)? Might be easier to update things between versions of
Live DVDs.
Bobb
.
From: marketing-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:marketing-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jody Garnett
I had intended to reply to Hamish - but I will follow the discussion here.
> Re "Which overviews are out of date":
The GeoTools description (http://www.osgeo.org/geotools) is terribly out of
date neither of the two renderers described exist anymore, the project is no
longer associated with GeoAPI
