Re: [Live-demo] openhub.net stats

2017-07-06 Thread Jody Garnett
There are some options for running stats on github repos (it seems like twice a year I get a grad student wanting me to review and endorse their approach). However we have projects now that are splitting up over several repositories (example QGIS). I kind of like some of the basic stats that come

Re: [Live-demo] openhub.net stats

2017-07-06 Thread Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
All, I noticed similar faults in the readouts for the GeoMOOSE project. It should be centered on Javascript as the Language but it’s being advertised as mostly PHP for some reason. I couldn’t find a spot to edit that either. It may be some sort of automated counter that the results are

Re: [Live-demo] openhub.net stats

2017-07-06 Thread Brian M Hamlin
Hi Jody -   thanks very much for your careful efforts ..     The utility of having a single "source of truth" for lines of code, activity and some language profile, has slightly outweighed the undesirable dynamic of a FOSS dot-org requiring a third-party service constantly to understand its

[Live-demo] openhub.net stats

2017-07-05 Thread Jody Garnett
I was looking at https://www.openhub.net/p/geotools/analyses/latest/ languages_summary today and noticed a distinct stairstep pattern every time the geotools project migrated repository CVS, SVN, GIT. This made the project appear at 2 million lines of code, rather than one million. I have