Re: [Live-demo] osgeo live branding and feedback

[Jody Garnett]

Okay reporting back with ... a conversation. The graphics designer is now
off on holiday (actually honeymoon) but we got a lot done in the last two
weeks since I have spoken with you. The priority was obviously the website
and stuff for printing.

For my last updated I tried to adapt the new branding elements and keep the
heart shape:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B022m344wU7hV0dUaU1ZdkFoM28

I did however manage to force the issue of subbrands; but doing up printing
materials including the geoforall and osgeo-live logo. You can check the
meeting notes for the result 


   - Review of OSGeo Live branding history
  -

 Discussion on relationship between projects and osgeo
 -

 We have an answer about “Live” - it is a live demonstration of
 software, rather than a static demo.
 -

 We have a strong relationship and we could ask OSGeo Live to use
 the OSGeo logo unaltered, however that does not answer the
general problem
 (of how to work with sub brands)


You may remember me asking what 'live" was meaning for osgeo live, judging
from early art assets in github (the svn banner had hidden early prototypes
of the logo). The thinking was "pulse" with hearts and heart rate monitors
tracking which projects were actually alive. The other meaning I could come
up with was a live demo, rather than a static demo.

Both Marc (strong marketing background) and the graphics designer (really
proud of the new logo and visuals). They wanted to ask if OSGeo Live would
be willing to use the following:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B08AjQ2hqLipZjJsSG12a19HcWM

This is an interesting tradeoff:
- because no other software project is being asked to update their logo
(only include an OSGeo project logo on their website).
- the tight relationship with OSGeo foundation is causing this request, so
a mark at how central osgeo-live is to our foundation
- I will support whatever direction the project chooses to take (hesitate
to offer my own opinion since I can see advantages both ways).

I have also had this question come up recently - why is OSGeo-Live not an
OSGeo project. The answer is simply that you have not asked and acquired a
mentor.
- You are of course welcome to apply as an OSGeo Community project (and get
approval right away - summer voting habits permitting)
- Entering incubation can also be done, but we need to line up a mentor
first.


--
Jody Garnett

On 22 June 2017 at 08:41, Jody Garnett  wrote:

> Wanted to provide a small update, I got some public and private feedback
> on the branding which I took into this weeks meeting.
>
> Many of the direct "osgeo foundation" activities just use the normal OSGeo
> Mark, we have the examples of "OSGeo Project", "OSGeo Community" as used by
> projects ready to go.
>
> A few sub brands (GeoForAll, OSGeo Live, local chapters) are expected to
> work with the design elements and create their own mark. We have asked the
> designer to use OSGeo Live as an example, this was the best I could do
> without stepping out of contract :)
>
> I checked the EOI and we have not paid for a sphinx theme. We will have to
> wait for the website to take shape and adapt later in the year.  Colors,
> logos and fonts we can do earlier.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Re: [Live-demo] openhub.net stats

[Jody Garnett]

There are some options for running stats on github repos (it seems like
twice a year I get a grad student wanting me to review and endorse their
approach). However we have projects now that are splitting up over several
repositories (example QGIS).

I kind of like some of the basic stats that come out of github "pulse" and
"contributors" are what matter to me :)



--
Jody Garnett

On 6 July 2017 at 08:03, Brian M Hamlin  wrote:

> Hi Jody -
>   thanks very much for your careful efforts ..
>   The utility of having a single "source of truth" for lines of code,
> activity and some language profile, has slightly outweighed the undesirable
> dynamic of a FOSS dot-org requiring a third-party service constantly to
> understand its own projects.   Personally, I feel OSGeo should have this
> ability in-house, along with other methods, and not rely so heavily on this
> one metric site. Certain project's measurements are horribly wrong to this
> day, and inevitably carry bias of varying kinds.
>   best regards from Berkeley
>   -Brian M Hamlin
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 21:59:16 -0700, Jody Garnett 
> wrote:
>
> I was looking at https://www.openhub.net/p/geotools/analyses/latest/langua
> ges_summary today and noticed a distinct stairstep pattern every time the
> geotools project migrated repository CVS, SVN, GIT.
> This made the project appear at 2 million lines of code, rather than one
> million.
> I have removed the old repositories, making the project appear younger
> than it is, but giving more accurate stats about what is there.
> I am under the impression OSGeo Live enjoys these stats? feedback welcome.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> -
>
> ___
> Live-demo mailing list
> Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> http://live.osgeo.org
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
>
> --
> Brian M Hamlin
> OSGeo California Chapter
> blog.light42.com
>
>
>
>
___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1958: artwork for 11.0

[OSGeo]

#1958: artwork for 11.0
-+
 Reporter:  kalxas   |   Owner:  live-demo@…
 Type:  task |  Status:  new
 Priority:  blocker  |   Milestone:  OSGeoLive11.0
Component:  LiveDVD  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:   |
-+

Comment (by bakaniko):

 I  like it.

 I can propose something based on this.

 Nice found !

--
Ticket URL: 
OSGeo 
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

[Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1958: artwork for 11.0

[OSGeo]

#1958: artwork for 11.0
-+---
 Reporter:  kalxas   |  Owner:  live-demo@…
 Type:  task | Status:  new
 Priority:  blocker  |  Milestone:  OSGeoLive11.0
Component:  LiveDVD  |   Keywords:
-+---
 How about something based on this?

 http://2017.foss4g.org/images/boston-map.png

--
Ticket URL: 
OSGeo 
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Re: [Live-demo] openhub.net stats

[Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)]

All,

I noticed similar faults in the readouts for the GeoMOOSE project.  It should 
be centered on Javascript as the Language but it’s being advertised as mostly 
PHP for some reason.  I couldn’t find a spot to edit that either.  It may be 
some sort of automated counter that the results are generated from, but even 
the last audit shows more Javascript lines of code.

GeoMOOSE had the same problems with line counts when moving between repos as 
well.  I think that was taken care of manually a little while ago.

Anyway, just chiming in.

bobb




On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:03 AM, Brian M Hamlin 
> wrote:

Hi Jody -
  thanks very much for your careful efforts ..
  The utility of having a single "source of truth" for lines of code, activity 
and some language profile, has slightly outweighed the undesirable dynamic of a 
FOSS dot-org requiring a third-party service constantly to understand its own 
projects.   Personally, I feel OSGeo should have this ability in-house, along 
with other methods, and not rely so heavily on this one metric site. Certain 
project's measurements are horribly wrong to this day, and inevitably carry 
bias of varying kinds.
  best regards from Berkeley
  -Brian M Hamlin




On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 21:59:16 -0700, Jody Garnett 
> wrote:

I was looking at 
https://www.openhub.net/p/geotools/analyses/latest/languages_summary today and 
noticed a distinct stairstep pattern every time the geotools project migrated 
repository CVS, SVN, GIT.
This made the project appear at 2 million lines of code, rather than one 
million.
I have removed the old repositories, making the project appear younger than it 
is, but giving more accurate stats about what is there.
I am under the impression OSGeo Live enjoys these stats? feedback welcome. --
Jody Garnett

-

___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

--
Brian M Hamlin
OSGeo California Chapter
blog.light42.com



___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc



"Interesting - I use a Mac to help me design the next Cray."
- Seymoure Cray (1925-1996) when he was told that Apple Inc. had recently 
bought a Cray supercomputer to help them design the next Mac.



___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Re: [Live-demo] openhub.net stats

[Brian M Hamlin]

Hi Jody -
  thanks very much for your careful efforts .. 
 
  The utility of having a single "source of truth" for lines of code, 
activity and some language profile, has slightly outweighed the 
undesirable dynamic of a FOSS dot-org requiring a third-party service 
constantly to understand its own projects.   Personally, I feel OSGeo 
should have this ability in-house, along with other methods, and not 
rely so heavily on this one metric site. Certain project's measurements 
are horribly wrong to this day, and inevitably carry bias of varying 
kinds. 
 

  best regards from Berkeley
  -Brian M Hamlin
 
 
 
 
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 21:59:16 -0700, Jody Garnett 
 wrote:


I was looking 
at https://www.openhub.net/p/geotools/analyses/latest/languages_summary today and noticed a distinct stairstep pattern every time the geotools project migrated repository CVS, SVN, 
GIT. 
This made the project appear at 2 million lines of code, rather than 
one million. 
 
I have removed the old repositories, making the project appear younger 
than it is, but giving more accurate stats about what is there. 
 
I am under the impression OSGeo Live enjoys these stats? feedback welcome. 
--

Jody Garnett

-

___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

--
Brian M Hamlin
OSGeo California Chapter
blog.light42.com

 

___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1953: uDig installer leaves a __MACOSX dir in /usr/lib

[OSGeo]

#1953: uDig installer leaves a __MACOSX dir in /usr/lib
---+
 Reporter:  darkblueb  |   Owner:  fgdrf
 Type:  defect |  Status:  assigned
 Priority:  major  |   Milestone:  OSGeoLive11.0
Component:  LiveDVD|  Resolution:
 Keywords:  udig   |
---+
Changes (by fgdrf):

 * owner:  live-demo@… => fgdrf
 * status:  new => assigned


--
Ticket URL: 
OSGeo 
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1953: uDig installer leaves a __MACOSX dir in /usr/lib

[OSGeo]

#1953: uDig installer leaves a __MACOSX dir in /usr/lib
---+
 Reporter:  darkblueb  |   Owner:  live-demo@…
 Type:  defect |  Status:  new
 Priority:  major  |   Milestone:  OSGeoLive11.0
Component:  LiveDVD|  Resolution:
 Keywords:  udig   |
---+

Comment (by fgdrf):

 fixed in uDig and assemblies for RC1 as well. Can you confirm after the
 nex build that it works for you?

--
Ticket URL: 
OSGeo 
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1952: GRASS Opacity dialog box too small

[OSGeo]

#1952: GRASS Opacity dialog box too small
--+
 Reporter:  micha |   Owner:  live-demo@…
 Type:  defect|  Status:  new
 Priority:  major |   Milestone:  OSGeoLive11.0
Component:  LiveDVD   |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  GRASS Opacity dialog  |
--+
Changes (by micha):

 * Attachment "VirtualBox_OSGeo-Live-11_06_07_2017_09_06_43.png" added.

 Screenshot in VirtualBox (windows host) running in FullScreen mode

--
Ticket URL: 
OSGeo 
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1952: GRASS Opacity dialog box too small

[OSGeo]

#1952: GRASS Opacity dialog box too small
--+
 Reporter:  micha |   Owner:  live-demo@…
 Type:  defect|  Status:  new
 Priority:  major |   Milestone:  OSGeoLive11.0
Component:  LiveDVD   |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  GRASS Opacity dialog  |
--+

Comment (by neteler):

 Micha, can you please add a small screenshot here?

--
Ticket URL: 
OSGeo 
OSGeo committee and general foundation issue tracker.
___
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc