Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live Mission and Future - was BOF

Brian, You have eloquently presented the current state of OSGeo-Live and the foundations for future opportunities and growth. I particularly agree with your caution about creating multiple documentation baselines for OSGeo, (it creates a maintenance challenge) and the recommendation of

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live Mission and Future - was BOF

Hi all: Not complaining, but just some thoughts about this: > with the new OSGeo web site development.. somehow I realized that the docs from OSGeo-Live should be the same docs in the new OSGeo web site. By "docs" you mean the current "overview documentation" or both overview and quickstart

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live Mission and Future - was BOF

Vicky Brian and Cameron are correct to point out duplication. Indeed cameron pointed out duplication when information sheets were being produced (sorry cameron I under estimated the enthusiastic response, we had planned to only print two information sheets!). Jeffrey Johnson (and Cameron?) have

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live Mission and Future - was BOF

As allways started experimentig ideas... plain copy of the file: https://cvvergara.github.io/osgeonode/index.html It didn't catch the formats, but at least the data is there: https://cvvergara.github.io/osgeonode/index.html On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Jody Garnett