[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r222541 - Extend PipePosix with child_processes_inherit support - to control whether pipe handles should be inherited by a child process.

2014-11-21 Thread Oleksiy Vyalov
Author: ovyalov Date: Fri Nov 21 10:18:57 2014 New Revision: 222541 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222541view=rev Log: Extend PipePosix with child_processes_inherit support - to control whether pipe handles should be inherited by a child process. http://reviews.llvm.org/D6348

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r222548 - Do some cleanup of DumpValueObjectOptions. The whole concept of raw printing was split between feature-specific flags, and an m_be_raw flag, which then drove some other

2014-11-21 Thread Enrico Granata
Author: enrico Date: Fri Nov 21 12:47:26 2014 New Revision: 222548 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222548view=rev Log: Do some cleanup of DumpValueObjectOptions. The whole concept of raw printing was split between feature-specific flags, and an m_be_raw flag, which then drove some

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] os.remove shouldn't fail, if file doesn't exist

2014-11-21 Thread Ismail Pazarbasi
Moved to the correct list. http://reviews.llvm.org/D6362 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] Put FreeBSD note types in their own namespace

2014-11-21 Thread Ed Maste
The NT_* note type names are common between different operating systems, with different values. Instead of naming them NT_FREEBSD_*, just put them in a FREEBSD namespace. Submitting for code review primarily for comment on coding style, since we don't have many examples to crib from already.

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] os.remove shouldn't fail, if file doesn't exist

2014-11-21 Thread Ismail Pazarbasi
Comment at: scripts/Python/buildSwigPython.py:686-687 @@ -685,4 +685,4 @@ (strEnvVarLLDBDisablePython == 1): os.remove( strSwigOutputFile ); open( strSwigOutputFile, 'w' ).close(); # Touch the file if bDebug:

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r222589 - Remove print statement that was accidentally left in.

2014-11-21 Thread Greg Clayton
Author: gclayton Date: Fri Nov 21 17:34:35 2014 New Revision: 222589 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222589view=rev Log: Remove print statement that was accidentally left in. Modified: lldb/trunk/test/functionalities/stop-hook/TestStopHookMechanism.py Modified:

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] os.remove shouldn't fail, if file doesn't exist

2014-11-21 Thread Ismail Pazarbasi
Added a new function called `removeignoreenoent`. http://reviews.llvm.org/D6362 Files: scripts/Python/buildSwigPython.py Index: scripts/Python/buildSwigPython.py === --- scripts/Python/buildSwigPython.py +++

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r222592 - Fix mispelled 'ling' Python property to be 'line' in

2014-11-21 Thread Jason Molenda
Author: jmolenda Date: Fri Nov 21 18:00:17 2014 New Revision: 222592 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222592view=rev Log: Fix mispelled 'ling' Python property to be 'line' in SBLineEntry and SBDeclaration. Patch from Chris Willmore. rdar://problem/19054323 Modified:

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] 5 minute timeout for tests

2014-11-21 Thread Ed Maste
Comment at: test/dosep.py:15 @@ -14,3 +14,3 @@ # Command template of the invocation of the test driver. -template = '%s %s/dotest.py %s -p %s %s' +template = 'timeout 5m %s %s/dotest.py %s -p %s %s' The bots run under an overall timeout, but it's much more

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] 5 minute timeout for tests

2014-11-21 Thread Zachary Turner
Maybe this is a good starting point: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1191374/subprocess-with-timeout http://reviews.llvm.org/D6364 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] os.remove shouldn't fail, if file doesn't exist

2014-11-21 Thread Ismail Pazarbasi
Use underscores in function name to match with the existing style. http://reviews.llvm.org/D6362 Files: scripts/Python/buildSwigPython.py Index: scripts/Python/buildSwigPython.py === --- scripts/Python/buildSwigPython.py +++

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r222599 - Make the sourcing of the local .lldbinit file quiet.

2014-11-21 Thread Jim Ingham
Author: jingham Date: Fri Nov 21 19:33:22 2014 New Revision: 222599 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222599view=rev Log: Make the sourcing of the local .lldbinit file quiet. rdar://problem/19065278 Modified: lldb/trunk/tools/driver/Driver.cpp lldb/trunk/tools/driver/Driver.h

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r222600 - This is the first step of making lldb able to create target-specific things

2014-11-21 Thread Jim Ingham
Author: jingham Date: Fri Nov 21 19:42:44 2014 New Revision: 222600 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222600view=rev Log: This is the first step of making lldb able to create target-specific things (e.g. breakpoints, stop-hooks) before we have any targets - for instance in your

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r222601 - When a RegisterContext produces an invalid CFA address, change

2014-11-21 Thread Jason Molenda
Author: jmolenda Date: Fri Nov 21 19:52:03 2014 New Revision: 222601 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222601view=rev Log: When a RegisterContext produces an invalid CFA address, change UnwindLLDB::AddOneMoreFrame to try the fallback unwind plan on that same stack frame before it tries

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r222602 - Fixed an issue where a DW_FORM_ref{2, 4, 8} might be extracted incorrectly because the wrong compile unit was being used to calculate the compile unit relative offset.

2014-11-21 Thread Greg Clayton
Author: gclayton Date: Fri Nov 21 19:58:59 2014 New Revision: 222602 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222602view=rev Log: Fixed an issue where a DW_FORM_ref{2,4,8} might be extracted incorrectly because the wrong compile unit was being used to calculate the compile unit relative

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] fix lldb-mi hang on OSX

2014-11-21 Thread dawn
This patch fixes the initial hang when starting up lldb-mi in interpreter mode on OSX. Without this, an additional return is required in order for lldb-mi to proceed after -exec-run and -gdb-exit is also not handled properly. The patch enables code which was commented out. Was there a reason