Hi labath, clayborg,
Fix [vdso] handling on Android (x86 and aarch64)
* Add in-memory object file handling to the core dynamic loader
* Fix in memory object file handling in ObjectFileELF (previously
only part of the file was loaded before parsing)
* Fix load address setting in ObjectFileELF
Prioritizing the python target definition seems a cleaner solution.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10775
Files:
source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.cpp
Index: source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.cpp
Should be OK now.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10727
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
Comment at: source/Target/Platform.cpp:1512
@@ +1511,3 @@
+ || arch.GetTriple ().getArch () == llvm::Triple::mipsel)
+ map_anon = 0x800;
+
labath wrote:
Wouldn't this be better in PlatformLinux? What are the odds of this
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
Comment at: source/Target/Platform.cpp:1512
@@ +1511,3 @@
+ || arch.GetTriple ().getArch () == llvm::Triple::mipsel)
+ map_anon = 0x800;
+
Wouldn't this be better in PlatformLinux? What are the odds of this constant
being
Author: labath
Date: Mon Jun 29 09:16:51 2015
New Revision: 240946
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240946view=rev
Log:
dosep.py: Add ability to set default test timout based on target
Summary:
Current default is 10 minutes, which causes the test suite to run very long in
case of
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10685
Files:
include/lldb/Target/Platform.h
source/Plugins/Platform/Linux/PlatformLinux.cpp
source/Plugins/Platform/Linux/PlatformLinux.h
source/Plugins/Process/Utility/InferiorCallPOSIX.cpp
source/Target/Platform.cpp
Index:
Sure, commit the makefile changes any time you like.
Sorry for the delay. I was not sure if I want this change or not, and I was
hoping someone else will have a say. BTW, is the cmake change even necessary
now? I just noticed that the root CMakeLists.txt has
if (NOT LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON)
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10685
Files:
include/lldb/Target/Platform.h
source/Plugins/Platform/Linux/PlatformLinux.cpp
source/Plugins/Platform/Linux/PlatformLinux.h
source/Plugins/Process/Utility/InferiorCallPOSIX.cpp
source/Target/Platform.cpp
Index:
On 24 June 2015 at 19:13, Enrico Granata egran...@apple.com wrote:
Author: enrico
Date: Wed Jun 24 18:13:23 2015
New Revision: 240606
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240606view=rev
Log:
Handle (or at least don't crash) trying to get the encoding for a bunch of
new builtin
Author: emaste
Date: Mon Jun 29 10:26:45 2015
New Revision: 240958
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240958view=rev
Log:
Correct failure decorator in test_fd_leak_multitarget
The random module in Python 2.7.8 and later leaks /dev/[u]random into
children. The test is expected to fail,
Author: tberghammer
Date: Mon Jun 29 11:28:37 2015
New Revision: 240964
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240964view=rev
Log:
Mark test_sb_api_listener_event_process_state as flakey
Modified:
lldb/trunk/test/api/multithreaded/TestMultithreaded.py
Modified:
Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeProcessLinux.h:145
@@ -146,1 +144,3 @@
+static Error
+PtraceWrapper(int req, lldb::pid_t pid, void *addr, void *data, size_t
data_size, long *result = nullptr);
It seems like every argument besides
See inlined comments for needed changes.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
Comment at: lldb/trunk/source/Host/posix/FileSystem.cpp:85-103
@@ -83,7 +84,21 @@
{
-StreamString command;
-command.Printf(rm -rf \%s\, file_spec.GetCString());
-int
Ah, I missed that this was committed. I will fix this.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10787
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Author: labath
Date: Mon Jun 29 04:18:17 2015
New Revision: 240927
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240927view=rev
Log:
[linux] Use cmake to detect support process_vm_readv (bug #23918)
Summary:
Some old linux versions do not have process_vm_readv function defined. Even
older
Adding Greg for review.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9404
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Looks good.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10811
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
- Shouldn't try to be clever.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10811
Files:
include/lldb/Host/FileSpec.h
source/Host/common/FileSpec.cpp
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
Index: include/lldb/Host/FileSpec.h
On 29 June 2015 at 14:47, Enrico Granata egran...@apple.com wrote:
I can see arguments for and against removing the default, but I think
removing it will cause a new warning to appear if Clang adds other new
kinds in the future.
Yes. And I am slightly more worried about the silent failure
Don't we already get behavior like this when we invoke a missing syscall?
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Pavel Labath lab...@google.com wrote:
Author: labath
Date: Mon Jun 29 04:18:17 2015
New Revision: 240927
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240927view=rev
Log:
[linux] Use
Author: gclayton
Date: Mon Jun 29 13:29:00 2015
New Revision: 240978
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240978view=rev
Log:
Avoid a recursive function call that could run LLDB out of file descriptors in
FileSystem::DeleteDirectory(...).
Fixes include:
- use FileSystem::Unlink()
On 29 June 2015 at 14:21, Enrico Granata egran...@apple.com wrote:
Are you trying to build with -Werror?
We are not here, so warnings don’t cause our builds to fail - and in this
case, I slightly prefer the default to stay
I'm not building with -Werror, just looking at the warnings that come
Looks good.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10685
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Looks good.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10775
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Sorry I didn't see this email before I fixed it.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10787
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Sorry I didn't see this email before I fixed it.
On Jun 29, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Chaoren Lin chaor...@google.com wrote:
Please let me fix this. I need to redeem myself.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10787
EMAIL PREFERENCES
On Jun 29, 2015, at 8:17 AM, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 24 June 2015 at 19:13, Enrico Granata egran...@apple.com wrote:
Author: enrico
Date: Wed Jun 24 18:13:23 2015
New Revision: 240606
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240606view=rev
Log:
Handle (or at least
I implemented my suggestions with:
% svn commit
Sendinginclude/lldb/Host/FileSpec.h
Sendingsource/Host/common/FileSpec.cpp
Sendingsource/Host/posix/FileSystem.cpp
Transmitting file data ...
Committed revision 240978.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
looks good.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10308
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Looks good. I am very happy to see memory loading of ELF files.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10800
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Author: gclayton
Date: Mon Jun 29 13:42:02 2015
New Revision: 240979
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240979view=rev
Log:
Fix buildbot failures for:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86-win7-msvc/builds/6152
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86-windows-msvc/builds/7422
Hi clayborg,
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10811
Files:
include/lldb/Host/FileSpec.h
source/Host/common/FileSpec.cpp
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
Index: include/lldb/Host/FileSpec.h
On Jun 29, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 June 2015 at 14:21, Enrico Granata egran...@apple.com wrote:
Are you trying to build with -Werror?
We are not here, so warnings don’t cause our builds to fail - and in this
case, I slightly prefer the default to stay
Author: kfischer
Date: Mon Jun 29 16:52:45 2015
New Revision: 241006
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=241006view=rev
Log:
Add -lpthread to LLDB shared lib link line unconditionally
Usually -lpthread is included due to LLVM link options,
but when LLVM threading is disabled, this does
Yup, seems like that would do it as well. Great, thanks!
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D5431
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Author: gclayton
Date: Mon Jun 29 15:08:51 2015
New Revision: 240988
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=240988view=rev
Log:
More packet reduction when debugging with GDB server.
- Avoid sending the qfThreadInfo, qsThreadInfo packets if we have a stop reply
packet with the threads
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D5431
Files:
lldb/trunk/lib/Makefile
lldb/trunk/tools/lldb-mi/Makefile
lldb/trunk/tools/lldb-server/Makefile
Index: lldb/trunk/tools/lldb-mi/Makefile
===
---
On Jun 29, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 June 2015 at 14:47, Enrico Granata egran...@apple.com wrote:
I can see arguments for and against removing the default, but I think
removing it will cause a new warning to appear if Clang adds other new
kinds in the
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10800#196543, @vharron wrote:
If you've fixed vdso handling, shouldn't some i386 tests be marked as
passing?
It is fixing it only on Android. There is a different between how the linker
works on Linux and on Android and we need to solve one more additional issue
If you've fixed vdso handling, shouldn't some i386 tests be marked as passing?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10800
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Followed up on Jason's comments
- Added check for the presence of iOS
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10308
Files:
source/Plugins/ABI/MacOSX-i386/ABIMacOSX_i386.cpp
Index: source/Plugins/ABI/MacOSX-i386/ABIMacOSX_i386.cpp
===
---
Looks good. Not sure if we also want to handle booleans? Should be easy to add
support for bools.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10821
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
Hi vharron, tberghammer,
This is aiming to workaround this issue:
When test is decorated with expectedFlakey* and has teardown hook attached, the
teardown hook will be added and executed twice,
the second execution will fail due to missing file.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10830
Files:
You can use the gdb remote get auxv command I think to get libvdso load
address.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Tamas Berghammer tbergham...@google.com
wrote:
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10800#196543, @vharron wrote:
If you've fixed vdso handling, shouldn't some i386 tests be marked as
You can use the gdb remote get auxv command I think to get libvdso load
address.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10800
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Maybe we should call teardown from expectedFlakey instead?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10830
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
Looks good to me.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10806
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
48 matches
Mail list logo
