[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D11102: Set the compiler's language options using the language of the current frame's CU, and fix ObjC evaluation.

2015-07-10 Thread Dawn Perchik
dawn created this revision. dawn added reviewers: clayborg, spyffe, zturner. dawn added a subscriber: lldb-commits. dawn set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM. The main purpose of this patch is to be able to get the frame's context (instead of just the target's) when evaluating, so

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D11102: Set the compiler's language options using the language of the current frame's CU, and fix ObjC evaluation.

2015-07-10 Thread Greg Clayton
clayborg resigned from this revision. clayborg removed a reviewer: clayborg. clayborg added a comment. I will defer to Sean Callanan. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D11102 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu

Re: [Lldb-commits] [Diffusion] rL240728: rdar://problem/21469556

2015-07-10 Thread Dawn Perchik
dawn added a subscriber: dawn. dawn raised a concern with this commit. dawn added a comment. This broke the build on OSX Mavericks (appears to work fine on Yosemite). After this commit, the lldb build now fails with: ... ../tools/lldb/tools/debugserver/source/MacOSX/MachTask.mm:452:41:

Re: [Lldb-commits] [Diffusion] rL238467: Refactor test runner to print sub-test-case pass/fail rate.

2015-07-10 Thread Dawn Perchik
dawn added a subscriber: lldb-commits. Users: zturner (Author) dawn (Auditor) http://reviews.llvm.org/rL238467 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Re: [Lldb-commits] [Diffusion] rL240728: rdar://problem/21469556

2015-07-10 Thread Dawn Perchik
dawn added a subscriber: lldb-commits. http://reviews.llvm.org/rL240728 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Re: [Lldb-commits] [Diffusion] rL238467: Refactor test runner to print sub-test-case pass/fail rate.

2015-07-10 Thread Dawn Perchik
dawn raised a concern with this commit. dawn added a comment. This is still an issue. We are still seeing a drop of ~550 in the total number of tests run since this commit. Please have a look? Thanks. Users: zturner (Author) dawn (Auditor) http://reviews.llvm.org/rL238467

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D11094: Refactor Unix signals.

2015-07-10 Thread Chaoren Lin
chaoren added a comment. It would be nice from the standpoint that you might be able to grab a copy of them and modify them before any processes are launched, but I don't see us doing any of this anywhere so I would rather avoid it until we do. We do this in the gdb remote tests. I added

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r241917 - Fixed a problem where variables in modules were not appropriately discovered by

2015-07-10 Thread Sean Callanan
Author: spyffe Date: Fri Jul 10 12:34:23 2015 New Revision: 241917 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=241917view=rev Log: Fixed a problem where variables in modules were not appropriately discovered by the expression parser. rdar://problem/21395220 Modified:

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r241919 - Don't try to make a pseudo terminal if we are launching in a separate terminal, it causes a deadlock when debugging because we create a PTY and yet it isn't hooked up t

2015-07-10 Thread Greg Clayton
Author: gclayton Date: Fri Jul 10 13:04:46 2015 New Revision: 241919 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=241919view=rev Log: Don't try to make a pseudo terminal if we are launching in a separate terminal, it causes a deadlock when debugging because we create a PTY and yet it isn't

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D11094: Refactor Unix signals.

2015-07-10 Thread Chaoren Lin
chaoren added inline comments. Comment at: include/lldb/API/SBUnixSignals.h:68 @@ -67,2 +67,3 @@ friend class SBProcess; +SBUnixSignals(const lldb::ProcessSP process_sp); labath wrote: You are changing the public API here. We are maintaining binary

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D11094: Refactor Unix signals.

2015-07-10 Thread Greg Clayton
clayborg requested changes to this revision. clayborg added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. So what is the overall goal of this patch? I am assuming the jist of this patch is to just get the JSON packet to get unix signals from the remote GDB server. The following

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D11066: Introduce a MainLoop class and switch llgs to use it

2015-07-10 Thread Greg Clayton
clayborg accepted this revision. clayborg added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. I am fine with this part of the patch since it doesn't introduce any changes and most of the threading issues seem to be with the ProcessMonitor if I understood your comments correctly.

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D11094: Refactor Unix signals.

2015-07-10 Thread Jim Ingham
Note, there is a document that describes the rules for coding the SB API's: http://lldb.llvm.org/SB-api-coding-rules.html if there's something there that isn't clear, feel free to clarify the text there... Jim On Jul 10, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Greg Clayton clayb...@gmail.com wrote: A quick

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r241964 - Add a another packet to the gdb-remote protocol,

2015-07-10 Thread Jason Molenda
Author: jmolenda Date: Fri Jul 10 18:15:22 2015 New Revision: 241964 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=241964view=rev Log: Add a another packet to the gdb-remote protocol, jGetLoadedDynamicLibrariesInfos. This packet is similar to qXfer:libraries:read except that lldb supplies the

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D11094: Refactor Unix signals.

2015-07-10 Thread Jim Ingham
jingham added a subscriber: jingham. jingham added a comment. Note, there is a document that describes the rules for coding the SB API's: http://lldb.llvm.org/SB-api-coding-rules.html if there's something there that isn't clear, feel free to clarify the text there... Jim