Author: jmolenda
Date: Fri Jan 27 20:54:10 2017
New Revision: 293366
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=293366=rev
Log:
One of the changes Jim made in r286288 (cleaning up the stop print
header line, backtrace output) was to remove the current pc value
from frames where we have source
EugeneBi updated this revision to Diff 86148.
EugeneBi added a comment.
Used named constants for SHN_UNDEF and SHN_XINDEX sentinels.
Unfortunately ELF.h lacks definition of PN_XNUM, so left it as a comment.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29095
Files:
source/Plugins/ObjectFile/ELF/ELFHeader.cpp
EugeneBi added inline comments.
Comment at: source/Plugins/ObjectFile/ELF/ELFHeader.cpp:108
+ if (ok) {
+if (e_phnum_hdr == 0x)
+ e_phnum = section_zero.sh_info;
EugeneBi wrote:
> EugeneBi wrote:
> > davidb wrote:
> > > Would this make more sense
EugeneBi added inline comments.
Comment at: source/Plugins/ObjectFile/ELF/ELFHeader.cpp:108
+ if (ok) {
+if (e_phnum_hdr == 0x)
+ e_phnum = section_zero.sh_info;
EugeneBi wrote:
> davidb wrote:
> > Would this make more sense to compare against a
EugeneBi added inline comments.
Comment at: source/Plugins/ObjectFile/ELF/ELFHeader.cpp:108
+ if (ok) {
+if (e_phnum_hdr == 0x)
+ e_phnum = section_zero.sh_info;
davidb wrote:
> Would this make more sense to compare against a named constant
Author: amccarth
Date: Fri Jan 27 15:42:28 2017
New Revision: 293336
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=293336=rev
Log:
NFC: Improve comments in SymbolFilePDB.cpp
Mostly this just fixes bad wrapping caused by the reformat, with tiny
changes sprinkled here and there.
Modified:
boris.ulasevich added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29144#659052, @jingham wrote:
> What's special about the TestCallThatThrows test?
Good question! It must be related with SetIgnoreBreakpoints(True) option used
in the test: with this option StopInfoBreakpoint::PerformAction is not
jingham added a comment.
If things were working generally the way your explanation states, then I don't
understand why this doesn't cause all expression evaluations to fail. We have
lots of tests that do expression evaluation. Why is only this test failing.
Your change looks reasonable to
boris.ulasevich updated this revision to Diff 86091.
boris.ulasevich added a comment.
I made another diff with using GetCompletedPlan call. Hope it makes the code
clear.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29144
Files:
lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp
Index: lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp
Thanks for following up! It's really appreciated!
-Tim
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Boris Ulasevich via lldb-commits <
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: bulasevich
> Date: Fri Jan 27 01:51:43 2017
> New Revision: 293269
>
> URL:
davidb added inline comments.
Comment at: source/Plugins/ObjectFile/ELF/ELFHeader.cpp:108
+ if (ok) {
+if (e_phnum_hdr == 0x)
+ e_phnum = section_zero.sh_info;
Would this make more sense to compare against a named constant ELF::PN_XNUM?
labath added a comment.
Thanks. I guess I'll give this one more week, and then commit it if noone
objects.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29126
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: labath
Date: Fri Jan 27 09:19:03 2017
New Revision: 293287
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=293287=rev
Log:
Address post-commit review remarks
Tamas pointed out that the macro name I used in r293282 was too vague.
Rename it to better reflect what it is used for.
Modified:
labath added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I've added a quick test to demonstrate what I had in mind.
> Unfortunately, unlike release_39 branch, I cannot open my core dump, but the
> problem
Author: labath
Date: Fri Jan 27 06:58:23 2017
New Revision: 293282
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=293282=rev
Log:
Fix android-i386 build broken by previous commit
I foolishly thought I could simplify the condition to cover all android
targets. I was wrong - i386 headers don't
Author: labath
Date: Fri Jan 27 06:23:51 2017
New Revision: 293281
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=293281=rev
Log:
Refactor the android accept hack
This moves the accept hack from the android toolchain file into
LLDBConfig.cmake. This allows successful lldb android compilation
labath added a comment.
Ok, I've just checked and this does not happen on windows. It does however
happen (GetTriple() returning None) when we try to open the s390x core file
(functionalities/postmortem/elf-core/linux-s390x.out). The test suite seems to
be handling it fine.
The only
nitesh.jain added a comment.
ERROR: test_two_cores_same_pid (TestMiniDumpNew.MiniDumpNewTestCase)
Test that we handle the situation if we have two core files with the same PID
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
labath requested changes to this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
This seems like it's fixing the problem in the wrong place. Also, the
assumption that the platform == host_platform is not correct (what about when
the test is run on windows?)
I
nitesh.jain created this revision.
In case of a core file, if the core file architecture(like x86_64) is
incompatible with that of Host architecture(like Mips64) then platform is set
to remote-platform. If the remote-platform is not connected then
SBPlatform::GetTriple() will return none.
Author: bulasevich
Date: Fri Jan 27 01:51:43 2017
New Revision: 293269
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=293269=rev
Log:
Unroll r292930 due to TestCallThatThrows test fail is not fixed in reasonable
time.
Removed:
21 matches
Mail list logo
