https://github.com/devnexen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
>From 7cfed8b3440d9257598fe94e02adc4d926692850 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:47:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] checks beforehand if lldb can trace/attach a process
on
https://github.com/devnexen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
>From 746a6959e270b086184ce095b11eb4df691dc4c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:47:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] checks beforehand if lldb can trace/attach a process
on
@@ -48,14 +48,37 @@ static Status EnsureFDFlags(int fd, int flags) {
return error;
}
+static Status CanTrace() {
+ Status status;
+ int proc_debug, ret;
+ size_t len = sizeof(proc_debug);
+ ret = ::sysctlbyname("security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug", _debug,
+
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79656
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2024-01-26T20:37:44-08:00
New Revision: 75952873036fc9989fcf12c526d1a2deaeef596a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/75952873036fc9989fcf12c526d1a2deaeef596a
DIFF:
https://github.com/Lewuathe closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76316
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
emaste wrote:
Thanks for picking this up -- I was starting to take a look but was sidetracked
with a lot of yak shaving.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -48,14 +48,36 @@ static Status EnsureFDFlags(int fd, int flags) {
return error;
}
+static Status CanTrace() {
+ int proc_debug, ret;
+ size_t len = sizeof(proc_debug);
+ ret = ::sysctlbyname("security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug", _debug,
+ ,
@@ -48,14 +48,37 @@ static Status EnsureFDFlags(int fd, int flags) {
return error;
}
+static Status CanTrace() {
+ Status status;
+ int proc_debug, ret;
+ size_t len = sizeof(proc_debug);
+ ret = ::sysctlbyname("security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug", _debug,
+
RamaMalladiAWS wrote:
Unable to get Windows build target machine allocated. Will reattempt another
submission.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79655
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/RamaMalladiAWS closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79655
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
https://github.com/RamaMalladiAWS updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79655
>From 96aba7076392fb7f7479ec3a313ced5cfb714f81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ubuntu
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:56:32 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] intrinsic to generate a bfi instruction
---
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
dcaballe wrote:
Thanks for the info! I think making the interleave op at Vector level available
to fixed vectors would also make sense. There is a point in knowing that a
shuffle is actually implementing an interleave pattern.
I guess we should also be fine with this LLVM limitations for now:
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+"""
+This module implements a couple of utility classes to make writing
+lldb parsed commands more Pythonic.
+The way to use it is to make a class for you command that inherits from
ParsedCommandBase.
+That will make an LLDBOVParser which you will use for your
https://github.com/trcrsired updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79542
>From 1039a36b2891f72192e77f2ef96736b1ab4315d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: trcrsired
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:47:43 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm] set emulated-tls by default for MinGW
x86_64-windows-gnu
https://github.com/trcrsired closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77216
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/devnexen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
>From 7fccec625677e8cabe8c69ac2651c37716dc30bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:47:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] checks beforehand if lldb can trace/attach a process
on
@@ -48,14 +48,37 @@ static Status EnsureFDFlags(int fd, int flags) {
return error;
}
+static Status CanTrace() {
+ Status status;
devnexen wrote:
true
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
___
@@ -48,14 +48,37 @@ static Status EnsureFDFlags(int fd, int flags) {
return error;
}
+static Status CanTrace() {
+ Status status;
+ int proc_debug, ret;
+ size_t len = sizeof(proc_debug);
+ ret = ::sysctlbyname("security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug", _debug,
+
https://github.com/trcrsired updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79667
>From 39bc0171e7c07e367446dd1abdc56fd918013a9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: trcrsired
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:44:41 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libunwind] Fix build for wasm
The wasm unwind build appears
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
Makes sense to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79656
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -48,14 +48,37 @@ static Status EnsureFDFlags(int fd, int flags) {
return error;
}
+static Status CanTrace() {
+ Status status;
+ int proc_debug, ret;
+ size_t len = sizeof(proc_debug);
+ ret = ::sysctlbyname("security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug", _debug,
+
@@ -48,14 +48,37 @@ static Status EnsureFDFlags(int fd, int flags) {
return error;
}
+static Status CanTrace() {
+ Status status;
bulbazord wrote:
Suggestion: You can remove this and just return {} below.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/trcrsired updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79667
>From 39bc0171e7c07e367446dd1abdc56fd918013a9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: trcrsired
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:44:41 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [libunwind] Fix build for wasm
The wasm unwind build appears to
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 8f1d94aaea5c18b83cd3b0df3be3a48ef1d3833d
3b490d6ef73c7ab3e8e1985a2cb25bb72a2c --
https://github.com/chelcassanova edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79533
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/chelcassanova edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79533
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ class ProgressEventData : public EventData {
GetAsStructuredData(const Event *event_ptr);
uint64_t GetID() const { return m_id; }
- bool IsFinite() const { return m_total != UINT64_MAX; }
+ bool IsFinite() const { return m_total != 1; }
https://github.com/chelcassanova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79533
>From 9274bcd897cd3ecdb3a842bc72ee660ba335aa57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:40:42 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb][progress][NFC] Add unit test for progress
jimingham wrote:
This is fine because the stl_summary_flags has skip pointers and skip
references false.
This might be an observable change, because this formatter would have matched a
reference to one of the types, but if the actual type was a pointer to a
reference, etc, then we would also
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79624
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2024-01-26T15:18:43-08:00
New Revision: 80bfac4327b6fb94cb9bf44eeb0d032799b9d418
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80bfac4327b6fb94cb9bf44eeb0d032799b9d418
DIFF:
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79649
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2024-01-26T15:04:11-08:00
New Revision: 33860b2f61a8a74141ae76ecd54742f9cfeb0d03
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33860b2f61a8a74141ae76ecd54742f9cfeb0d03
DIFF:
https://github.com/devnexen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
>From 52618e6e6e028ea4a65728eda0c877dce176ccfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:47:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] checks beforehand if lldb can trace/attach a process
on
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff e4afffbe8cc31278a9006712e7323d49eae9dbb6
492521e66288a497bf5b4a4a8ce554dffeb35727 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: David CARLIER (devnexen)
Changes
before having the generic EINVAL message, we check if the
`security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug` allows process debugging.
close #79634
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662.diff
@@ -192,6 +198,9 @@ class ConstString {
return llvm::StringRef(m_string, GetLength());
}
+ /// Get the string value as a std::string
+ std::string GetString() const { return std::string(m_string, GetLength()); }
JDevlieghere wrote:
It's not
https://github.com/devnexen created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79662
before having the generic EINVAL message, we check if the
`security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug` allows process debugging.
close #79634
>From 492521e66288a497bf5b4a4a8ce554dffeb35727 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
https://github.com/felipepiovezan approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79649
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -192,6 +198,9 @@ class ConstString {
return llvm::StringRef(m_string, GetLength());
}
+ /// Get the string value as a std::string
+ std::string GetString() const { return std::string(m_string, GetLength()); }
felipepiovezan wrote:
why is this
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79649
>From b0abae7ac1208321a4a7033bcc456dba645b47bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:35:52 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Streamline ConstString -> std::string conversion
https://github.com/kastiglione closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79644
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Dave Lee
Date: 2024-01-26T14:28:39-08:00
New Revision: 074630e8af94d839f6baf6378d7ed3d7a6d2753c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/074630e8af94d839f6baf6378d7ed3d7a6d2753c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/074630e8af94d839f6baf6378d7ed3d7a6d2753c.diff
https://github.com/ldionne milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73618
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Jonas Devlieghere (JDevlieghere)
Changes
On Darwin, the Makefile already (ad-hoc) signs everything it builds. There's
also no need to use lldb_codesign for this.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79656.diff
8
https://github.com/JDevlieghere created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79656
On Darwin, the Makefile already (ad-hoc) signs everything it builds. There's
also no need to use lldb_codesign for this.
>From 80d68ab889989ddae906af3b2042158a12a0ca46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas
https://github.com/medismailben approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79649
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79649
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Lewuathe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76316
>From a5810363e546da073543cb2d62cceb956c46b2e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Sasaki
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 15:53:54 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [mlir][complex] Prevent underflow in complex.abs
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+#include "Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformMacOSX.h"
+#include "Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformRemoteMacOSX.h"
+#include "lldb/Core/Debugger.h"
+#include "lldb/Core/Progress.h"
+#include "lldb/Host/FileSystem.h"
+#include "lldb/Host/HostInfo.h"
+#include
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 84be954cb26ebde58d4ddd2255dfd99904d9ae1b
fd1938e02a4e0394190d90792933e81fce7fc329 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Jonas Devlieghere (JDevlieghere)
Changes
Make it easier to go from a ConstString to a std::string without having to go
through a C-String or a llvm::StringRef. I made the conversion operator
explicit as this is a relatively expensive
@@ -776,6 +776,10 @@ std::optional
SymbolLocatorDebugSymbols::LocateExecutableSymbolFile(
exec_fspec ? exec_fspec->GetFilename().AsCString("") : "",
arch ? arch->GetArchitectureName() : "", (const void *)uuid);
+ Progress progress(
+ "Locating external
https://github.com/JDevlieghere created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79649
Make it easier to go from a ConstString to a std::string without having to go
through a C-String or a llvm::StringRef. I made the conversion operator
explicit as this is a relatively expensive operations
https://github.com/Zingam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: None (srcarroll)
Changes
As far as I am aware, there is no simple way to match on elementwise ops. I
propose to add an `elementwise` criteria to the `match.structured.body` op.
Although my only hesitation is that elementwise is not only
https://github.com/srcarroll ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
https://github.com/srcarroll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79624
>From 7979269a57fc553a7b010a36b9c75bf570adf674 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:34:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Fix progress reporting for
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79644
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79644
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
chelini wrote:
Is it ready for review? Is marked as "draft".
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
kastiglione wrote:
Because of clang-format, the diff obscures the fact that this change only
deletes `(( )?&)?` from these strings. There are no other changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79644
___
lldb-commits mailing list
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Dave Lee (kastiglione)
Changes
The `(( )?)?` appears to match types which are references. However lldb
can load the
correct data formatters without having to pattern match against a ``
suffix.
The suffix may have been needed at one
@@ -1050,28 +1054,25 @@ bool
SymbolLocatorDebugSymbols::DownloadObjectAndSymbolFile(
const std::string file_path_str =
file_spec_ptr ? file_spec_ptr->GetPath() : "";
- Log *log = GetLog(LLDBLog::Host);
+ if (uuid_str.empty() && file_path_str.empty())
+return
@@ -776,6 +776,10 @@ std::optional
SymbolLocatorDebugSymbols::LocateExecutableSymbolFile(
exec_fspec ? exec_fspec->GetFilename().AsCString("") : "",
arch ? arch->GetArchitectureName() : "", (const void *)uuid);
+ Progress progress(
+ "Locating external
https://github.com/adrian-prantl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79624
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/adrian-prantl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79624
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/kastiglione created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79644
The `(( )?&)?` appears to match types which are references. However lldb can
load the
correct data formatters without having to pattern match against a `&` suffix.
The suffix may have been needed at one
Zingam wrote:
@petrhosek According to the log, the tests in this patch pass. Could you please
try again. I'll wait a while and if there is not negative feedback I'll reland
the patch.
>
@@ -776,6 +776,10 @@ std::optional
SymbolLocatorDebugSymbols::LocateExecutableSymbolFile(
exec_fspec ? exec_fspec->GetFilename().AsCString("") : "",
arch ? arch->GetArchitectureName() : "", (const void *)uuid);
+ Progress progress(
+ "Locating external
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
@@ -776,6 +776,10 @@ std::optional
SymbolLocatorDebugSymbols::LocateExecutableSymbolFile(
exec_fspec ? exec_fspec->GetFilename().AsCString("") : "",
arch ? arch->GetArchitectureName() : "", (const void *)uuid);
+ Progress progress(
+ "Locating external
https://github.com/Zingam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79032
>From e03452fda84a5284420bba1913299b68caabb6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "Revert "[libc++][format] P2637R3: Member `visit`
Zingam wrote:
@petrhosek It is not related. It was supposedly fixed by this:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79619
I've been observing the chromium Windows CI failing for a while. Let's see if
the above patch fixes it. I'll rebase now this one now.
clayborg wrote:
> I'm not following all of this, but it appears to be based on the premise that
> it's OK that sometimes split units inside a DWP file are parsed before their
> skeleton unit? Why is that OK/when/why/where is that happening?
When we have accelerator tables from lldb index
petrhosek wrote:
I tried this branch on our Windows builders although I'm not sure if it's
related or not to this patch:
```
# COMPILED WITH
C:/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build/./bin/clang-cl.exe
C:\b\s\w\ir\x\w\github-H-G-Hristov-llvm-project\libcxx\test\libcxx\fuzzing\random.pass.cpp
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
https://github.com/srcarroll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79626
>From ab475c9ffb7c3562bad4772389e97b82e9f110c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:55:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Add elementwise criteria to match.structured.body
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+#include "Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformMacOSX.h"
+#include "Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformRemoteMacOSX.h"
+#include "lldb/Core/Debugger.h"
+#include "lldb/Core/Progress.h"
+#include "lldb/Host/FileSystem.h"
+#include "lldb/Host/HostInfo.h"
+#include
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+#include "Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformMacOSX.h"
+#include "Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformRemoteMacOSX.h"
+#include "lldb/Core/Debugger.h"
+#include "lldb/Core/Progress.h"
+#include "lldb/Host/FileSystem.h"
+#include "lldb/Host/HostInfo.h"
+#include
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+#include "Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformMacOSX.h"
+#include "Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformRemoteMacOSX.h"
+#include "lldb/Core/Debugger.h"
+#include "lldb/Core/Progress.h"
+#include "lldb/Host/FileSystem.h"
+#include "lldb/Host/HostInfo.h"
+#include
https://github.com/clayborg commented:
It is great to have unit tests for this. I remember with your previous patch we
caught an issue where the completed event might not be delivered, or it would
be delivered without the values being set correctly, so this will be great to
be able to catch
https://github.com/clayborg edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79533
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -831,6 +831,37 @@ bool
lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallCommandObject(
return true;
}
+bool lldb_private::python::SWIGBridge::LLDBSwigPythonCallParsedCommandObject(
+PyObject *implementor, lldb::DebuggerSP debugger,
https://github.com/chelcassanova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79533
>From 9274bcd897cd3ecdb3a842bc72ee660ba335aa57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:40:42 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][progress][NFC] Add unit test for progress
JDevlieghere wrote:
> This is only testing the `Progress` class constructor behavior. Could you
> check that the `Progress::Increment` method works as expected ?
While it would be nice to have full test coverage, the goal was to cover the
existing behavior which we'll modify/extend to
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+#include "Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformMacOSX.h"
chelcassanova wrote:
Will do! I told myself I'd add it at the end then I fully forgot to do that
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79533
Author: Alex Langford
Date: 2024-01-26T10:40:33-08:00
New Revision: 02d3a799e7eb2997950d6a288a08a5e51ff0ff59
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02d3a799e7eb2997950d6a288a08a5e51ff0ff59
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/02d3a799e7eb2997950d6a288a08a5e51ff0ff59.diff
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
