https://github.com/usama54321 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88349
>From de4ed3289ecb52b4971f6abe942c0a3af9e6425a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: usama
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:07:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB] Add asan tests for libsanitizers.
This patch tests LLDB
https://github.com/usama54321 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88349
>From a1ef63cd8f5bb927fc58827996b22c1f4dba15bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: usama
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:07:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB] Add asan tests for libsanitizers.
This patch tests LLDB
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
026165fad70420d85defb5fc9109c138250058ee...4cee76dff9b474a6a6bd278ea69cde6c3be924ad
usama54321 wrote:
I reused the test in TestReportData because the output should match exactly
with current ASan. For TestMemoryHistory, libsanitizers currently only supports
the memory history plugin for addresses for which a report has been generated,
so I wrote a test separately.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Usama Hameed (usama54321)
Changes
This patch tests LLDB integration with libsanitizers for ASan.
rdar://111856681
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88349.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/usama54321 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88349
This patch tests LLDB integration with libsanitizers for ASan.
rdar://111856681
>From 4cee76dff9b474a6a6bd278ea69cde6c3be924ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: usama
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:07:11 -0700
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88335
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
MaskRay wrote:
This is not for review yet. When ld.lld --debug-names is added, this PR will be
changed to add a few lines to `lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/x86` tests.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88335
___
lldb-commits mailing list
https://github.com/bwendling closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79365
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Chelsea Cassanova (chelcassanova)
Changes
…db-enumerations.h" (#88324)"
This reverts commit 9f6d08f2566a26144ea1753f80aebb1f2ecfdc63. This broke the
build because of a usage of one of the original SBDebugger broadcast bits that
wasn't
https://github.com/chelcassanova created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88331
…db-enumerations.h" (#88324)"
This reverts commit 9f6d08f2566a26144ea1753f80aebb1f2ecfdc63. This broke the
build because of a usage of one of the original SBDebugger broadcast bits that
wasn't updated in
https://github.com/chelcassanova closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88324
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: 2024-04-10T14:54:30-07:00
New Revision: 9f6d08f2566a26144ea1753f80aebb1f2ecfdc63
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9f6d08f2566a26144ea1753f80aebb1f2ecfdc63
DIFF:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Chelsea Cassanova (chelcassanova)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#87409 due a missed update to the broadcast
bit causing a build failure on the x86_64 Debian buildbot.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88324.diff
https://github.com/chelcassanova created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88324
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#87409 due a missed update to the broadcast bit
causing a build failure on the x86_64 Debian buildbot.
>From 27a49dc1d37f3e7ffa855ed7a536a796fa2e1642 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
https://github.com/chelcassanova closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87409
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: 2024-04-10T14:45:49-07:00
New Revision: af7c196fb8d10f58a704b5a8d142feacf2f0236d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af7c196fb8d10f58a704b5a8d142feacf2f0236d
DIFF:
https://github.com/chelcassanova edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87409
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/chelcassanova edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87409
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/chelcassanova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87409
>From 7561d03d775822f789a61a5b827dfa04b29b57b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:22:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb][sbdebugger] Match progress category enum bit
@@ -1339,6 +1339,14 @@ enum AddressMaskRange {
eAddressMaskRangeAll = eAddressMaskRangeAny,
};
+/// Used by the debugger to indicate which events are being broadcasted.
+enum DebuggerBroadcastBit {
+ eBroadcastBitProgress = (1 << 0),
+ eBroadcastBitWarning = (1 << 1),
+
@@ -1339,6 +1339,14 @@ enum AddressMaskRange {
eAddressMaskRangeAll = eAddressMaskRangeAny,
};
+/// Used by the debugger to indicate which events are being broadcasted.
+enum DebuggerBroadcastBit {
+ eBroadcastBitProgress = (1 << 0),
+ eBroadcastBitWarning = (1 << 1),
+
https://github.com/medismailben edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87409
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/medismailben approved this pull request.
LGTM if you address the comment and rewrite the PR description and title :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87409
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
medismailben wrote:
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88047
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/medismailben approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88047
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Michael137 wrote:
> > No particular reason apart from it being scoped, which I thought we might
> > prefer for new enums. But there's no reason it couldn't be an old-school
> > enum
>
> If that's the case I think consistency is more important. Mind putting up a
> PR?
Yup will do sometime
https://github.com/mordante created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88312
None
>From a94781dd9a993d88dc1eb0897eade23fb4acdf4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark de Wever
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:12:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++][CI] Tests LLDB libc++ data formatters.
---
oontvoo wrote:
> A bunch of time has passed since the original RFC. It would be great, and
> help with reviewing the PR, to have an overview of the currently proposed
> architecture, the different pieces and how it all fits together. I left some
> inline comments, but I'm not sure if it's
https://github.com/tedwoodward approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88301
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Ayush Sahay (ayushsahay1837)
Changes
Currently, GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::Handle_qfThreadInfo asserts if the
number of processes under debug isn’t 1 and the multiprocess feature isn’t
supported. This is so that we don't string IDs
https://github.com/ayushsahay1837 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88301
Currently, GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::Handle_qfThreadInfo asserts if the
number of processes under debug isn’t 1 and the multiprocess feature isn’t
supported. This is so that we don't string IDs
https://github.com/chelcassanova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87409
>From 7561d03d775822f789a61a5b827dfa04b29b57b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chelsea Cassanova
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:22:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb][sbdebugger] Match progress category enum bit
@@ -42,11 +42,13 @@ class LLDB_API SBInputReader {
class LLDB_API SBDebugger {
public:
+ // The enum values here need to match their corresponding values in
+ // Debugger.h.
FLAGS_ANONYMOUS_ENUM(){
eBroadcastBitProgress = (1 << 0),
eBroadcastBitWarning = (1
ayushsahay1837 wrote:
Accidentally merged branch 'main' into main; hence, abandoning.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88279
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/ayushsahay1837 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88279
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -1339,6 +1339,14 @@ enum AddressMaskRange {
eAddressMaskRangeAll = eAddressMaskRangeAny,
};
+/// Used by the debugger to indicate which events are being broadcasted.
+enum DebuggerBroadcast {
JDevlieghere wrote:
`DebuggerBroadcastBit` maybe?
@@ -42,11 +42,13 @@ class LLDB_API SBInputReader {
class LLDB_API SBDebugger {
public:
+ // The enum values here need to match their corresponding values in
+ // Debugger.h.
FLAGS_ANONYMOUS_ENUM(){
eBroadcastBitProgress = (1 << 0),
eBroadcastBitWarning = (1
https://github.com/ayushsahay1837 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88279
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/mgorny approved this pull request.
Sure, I suppose it makes sense. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88279
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Ayush Sahay (ayushsahay1837)
Changes
Currently, GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::Handle_qfThreadInfo asserts if the
number of processes under debug isn’t 1 and the multiprocess feature isn’t
supported. This is so that we don't string IDs
https://github.com/ayushsahay1837 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88279
>From e5f994d2ccc359b90c9aaae33f08d702f2ca8d4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ayush Sahay
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:40:15 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] [llgs] Fix assertion in Handle_qfThreadInfo
https://github.com/ayushsahay1837 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88279
Currently, GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::Handle_qfThreadInfo asserts if the
number of processes under debug isn’t 1 and the multiprocess feature isn’t
supported. This is so that we don't string IDs
kpdev wrote:
Hello, @jimingham , first of all - sorry for the long delay in reply.
I carefully read through all your messages once again and found, that I totally
misunderstood some places, i.e. "Why isn't it enough to have the
ValueObjectSynthetic's SetValueFromCString do this" - I think it
https://github.com/kpdev updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67782
>From ccc9fb6be2f390cd894e0632cfded98f329f3059 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Kosov
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:45:49 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB] Add ability to update string during debugging
This is the
45 matches
Mail list logo
