[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build (PR #141543)

https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141543 >From 75f0f1463c7bcabb5ffef34c0f1e1c0b4ca91b04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "A. Jiang" Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 12:10:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build (PR #141543)

https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141543 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build (PR #141543)

https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141543 >From 75f0f1463c7bcabb5ffef34c0f1e1c0b4ca91b04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "A. Jiang" Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 12:10:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build (PR #141543)

frederick-vs-ja wrote: > I'm a bit confused why this test is special and would be the only one > manually setting `disableASLR=False`. I changed the default in #113593 Would it be a good idea to change here instead in order to restore `disableASLR=False`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build (PR #141543)

frederick-vs-ja wrote: There're many TSan and MSan errors seemingly related to ASLR. But it's curious that how did they happen when `TestDAP_subtleFrames.py` hasn't been executed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141543 ___ lldb-commits maili

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build (PR #141543)

https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141543 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build (PR #141543)

https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141543 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build (PR #141543)

https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141543 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [libc++][lldb-dap][test] Fix CI for bootstrapping-build (PR #141543)

https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141543 It seem that #140107 changed the default argument of `disableASLR` of related functions from `False` to `True`. libc++ CI has been stably failing for `TestDAP_subtleFrames.py` (in bootstrapping-build) s

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Include `` for `system_clock` (PR #118059)

https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja approved this pull request. LGTM! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118059 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [lldb] [lldb][libc++] Hide all libc++ implementation details from stacktraces (PR #108870)

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +import lldb +from lldbsuite.test.decorators import * +from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import * +from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil + + +class LibCxxInternalsRecognizerTestCase(TestBase): +NO_DEBUG_INFO_TESTCASE = True + +@add_test_categories(["libc++"]) +

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][test] Add test for no_unique_address when mixed with bitfields (PR #108155)

frederick-vs-ja wrote: > The test will fail on windows because no_unique_address is not a thing there: Seems like that we should spell it as `[[msvc::no_unique_address]]` on Windows. Is there already such a macro in lldb/test covering this? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108155

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [flang] [clang] [compiler-rt] [llvm] [lldb] [clang-tools-extra] [libc] [lld] [libc++][variant] P2637R3: Member `visit` (`std::variant`) (PR #76447)

https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76447 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

[Lldb-commits] [libcxx] [flang] [clang] [compiler-rt] [llvm] [lldb] [clang-tools-extra] [libc] [lld] [libc++][variant] P2637R3: Member `visit` (`std::variant`) (PR #76447)

@@ -1273,6 +1293,22 @@ public: __impl_.__swap(__that.__impl_); } +# if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26 + // [variant.visit], visitation + + template frederick-vs-ja wrote: Would it be better to use a special tag type like this ```C++ struct __variant_visit_ba