https://github.com/jpienaar closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139252
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139252
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139252
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139252
>From c5ffbd84f8b68bae2112e8cec68803cefe571a72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 05:23:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [lldb][plugin] Clear in same thread as set
Here we were i
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139252
Rate limit · GitHub
body {
background-color: #f6f8fa;
color: #24292e;
font-family: -apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,Segoe
UI,Helvetica,Arial,sans-
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139252
>From c5ffbd84f8b68bae2112e8cec68803cefe571a72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 05:23:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb][plugin] Clear in same thread as set
Here we were i
jpienaar wrote:
I agree a condition variable would work here. I realized this later too (wanted
all destroyed at end), one could do that as follows too
// In ManualDWARFIndex
...
std::vector clear_cu_dies;
clear_cu_dies.reserve(units_to_index.size());
for (auto &unit : units_to_index
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139252
>From c5ffbd84f8b68bae2112e8cec68803cefe571a72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 05:23:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][plugin] Clear in same thread as set
Here we were i
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139252
>From c5ffbd84f8b68bae2112e8cec68803cefe571a72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 05:23:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][plugin] Clear in same thread as set
Here we were i
https://github.com/jpienaar created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139252
Here we were initializing & locking a shared_mutex in a thread, while releasing
it in the parent which may/often turned out to be a different thread
(shared_mutex::unlock_shared is undefined behavior if called
https://github.com/jpienaar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138174
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80246
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
jpienaar wrote:
> Can you expand on the motivation? Why is it a problem that PDL is always
> included? Your description isn’t very explicit on the impact.
Done. Its not PDL specific, I think it is a problem if any dialect is always
included even if not used :) The others just have a simple met
https://github.com/jpienaar edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69927
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69927
>From eea36708d838411d70eb99265c3a2f3aabb91460 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:33:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [mlir] Add config for PDL
Make it so that PDL can be optional
15 matches
Mail list logo
