dblaikie added a comment.
FWIW, clang has support for including template parameter DIEs for template
declarations (-Xclang -debug-forward-template-params). We could enable that by
default when tuning for lldb (or maybe we're at the tipping point and we should
enable it by default in general -
teemperor added a comment.
> I don't really have the full context here, but I am wondering if we shouldn't
> somehow take the DW_AT_declaration attribute into account here. It seems like
> that should give a more definitive answer as to whether we can expect to see
> a full set of template
labath added a comment.
I don't really have the full context here, but I am wondering if we shouldn't
somehow take the `DW_AT_declaration` attribute into account here. It seems like
that should give a more definitive answer as to whether we can expect to see a
full set of template parameters
PatriosTheGreat created this revision.
PatriosTheGreat added a reviewer: teemperor.
Herald added a reviewer: shafik.
Herald added a project: All.
PatriosTheGreat requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: LLDB.
Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
Right now LLDB ignores nested
