[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32626: Make the symbol demangling loop order independent

2017-04-28 Thread Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
labath added a comment. If you're going to be making drastic changes here, could you please look at the possibility of making a more targeted test, rather than relying on the "run the whole debugger and set a breakpoint" type of tests to verify the finer details of the implementation. I was

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32626: Make the symbol demangling loop order independent

2017-04-27 Thread Scott Smith via Phabricator via lldb-commits
scott.smith abandoned this revision. scott.smith added a comment. Turns out I'm planning on making more drastic changes to this loop, so there's no point in reviewing this step. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D32626 ___

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32626: Make the symbol demangling loop order independent

2017-04-27 Thread Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits
jingham added a reviewer: clayborg. jingham added a comment. Adding Greg as a reviewer. You can generally see from the CODE_OWNERS.txt file who has overall responsibility for areas in lldb, and you should at least assign them as a reviewer. For Symbol parsing stuff that's definitely Greg.