wallace updated this revision to Diff 224722.
wallace added a comment.
i think i finally wrote something that works python 2 and 3
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354
Files:
lldb/packages/Pyt
wallace updated this revision to Diff 224721.
wallace added a comment.
after the logging finally found the bug, it's was an encoding issue due to a
different python version
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
https://reviews.l
wallace updated this revision to Diff 224717.
wallace added a comment.
adding some logging for exceptions in the mock server
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354
Files:
lldb/packages/Python/ll
wallace updated this revision to Diff 224716.
wallace added a comment.
another try
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354
Files:
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/gdb_remote_cl
wallace updated this revision to Diff 224703.
wallace added a comment.
- update
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354
Files:
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/gdb_remote_clien
wallace updated this revision to Diff 224656.
wallace added a comment.
now it should work, the test pass
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354
Files:
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functio
wallace closed this revision.
wallace added a comment.
this was reverted
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-comm
shafik added a comment.
I reverted this change b/c the green dragon bots have been red for too long.
When you fix the problem please make sure you add
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354
to your commit message.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACT
stella.stamenova added a comment.
The windows LLDB bot also has the same failure:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x64-windows-ninja/builds/9600
Please make sure your fix works for both.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/ne
wallace added a comment.
damn, i'll rebase and try to fix it
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.ll
shafik added a comment.
@wallace it looks like `TestPlatformClient.py` is failing on osx see green
dragon log here:
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/2317/testReport/junit/lldb-Suite/functionalities_gdb_remote_client/TestPlatformClient_py/
===
wallace marked an inline comment as done.
wallace added inline comments.
Comment at:
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/gdb_remote_client/TestPlatformClient.py:30
+self.expect("platform process list -x",
+startstr="1 matching
labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LG, thanks for the test.
Comment at:
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/gdb_remote_client/TestPlatformClient.py:30
+self.expect("platform proces
wallace updated this revision to Diff 223358.
wallace added a comment.
added a basic python test
It was a nice learning experience and fortunately there was no need to add any
intrusive code
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
labath added a comment.
I think the fact that all of our options *must* have a short version is a
pretty serious deficiency in our option parsing system. It results in a lot of
unintuitive options that nobody uses because they can't guess what they stand
for. But anyway, `-x` seems as good as a
wallace added a comment.
Btw, I couldn't find a better short command than 'x', but if you have a better
suggestion, i'd be happy to accept it :)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68354
__
wallace created this revision.
wallace added reviewers: labath, xiaobai, aadsm, clayborg.
Herald added subscribers: lldb-commits, atanasyan, kristof.beyls, arichardson,
sdardis.
Herald added a project: LLDB.
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on
17 matches
Mail list logo
