[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77582: [CommandInterpreter] Implement UserCommandExists

2020-04-07 Thread walter erquinigo via Phabricator via lldb-commits
wallace abandoned this revision. wallace added a comment. Will revisit it whenever I need it Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77582/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77582 ___ lldb-commits

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77582: [CommandInterpreter] Implement UserCommandExists

2020-04-07 Thread Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits
jingham added a comment. In D77582#1967031 , @labath wrote: > In D77582#1966962 , @teemperor wrote: > > > I think the part of the patch that adds documentation to the existing > > method should go in (In general

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77582: [CommandInterpreter] Implement UserCommandExists

2020-04-07 Thread Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
labath added a comment. In D77582#1966962 , @teemperor wrote: > I think the part of the patch that adds documentation to the existing method > should go in (In general all patches that just add documentation have my > blanket approval, so please just

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77582: [CommandInterpreter] Implement UserCommandExists

2020-04-07 Thread Raphael Isemann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
teemperor added a comment. I think the part of the patch that adds documentation to the existing method should go in (In general all patches that just add documentation have my blanket approval, so please just commit those). For the additional function: If you just change that CommandExists

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77582: [CommandInterpreter] Implement UserCommandExists

2020-04-07 Thread Shafik Yaghmour via Phabricator via lldb-commits
shafik added a comment. I agree, if we don't have an immediate use then I don't think we should add it now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77582/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77582

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77582: [CommandInterpreter] Implement UserCommandExists

2020-04-07 Thread Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
labath added a reviewer: jingham. labath added a comment. I don't have a hard objection to this, but if we're don't have a use for it, I don't see a need for adding it right now. Particularly as it sounds weird to me that "user commands" are not a subset of "commands". I know that is how the

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77582: [CommandInterpreter] Implement UserCommandExists

2020-04-06 Thread walter erquinigo via Phabricator via lldb-commits
wallace created this revision. wallace added reviewers: labath, clayborg. Herald added subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny. Herald added a project: LLDB. wallace updated this revision to Diff 255454. wallace added a comment. wallace updated this revision to Diff 255455. . wallace added a comment.

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77582: [CommandInterpreter] Implement UserCommandExists

2020-04-06 Thread walter erquinigo via Phabricator via lldb-commits
wallace updated this revision to Diff 255455. wallace added a comment. Improve some names Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77582/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77582 Files: lldb/bindings/interface/SBCommandInterpreter.i

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77582: [CommandInterpreter] Implement UserCommandExists

2020-04-06 Thread walter erquinigo via Phabricator via lldb-commits
wallace updated this revision to Diff 255454. wallace added a comment. . Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77582/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77582 Files: lldb/bindings/interface/SBCommandInterpreter.i