[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Invert relationship between Process and AddressableBits (PR #85858)

2024-03-20 Thread Alex Langford via lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85858 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Invert relationship between Process and AddressableBits (PR #85858)

2024-03-19 Thread Jason Molenda via lldb-commits
https://github.com/jasonmolenda approved this pull request. Thanks for fixing this, I hadn't been paying attention to the separation when I added this method. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85858 ___ lldb-commits mailing list

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Invert relationship between Process and AddressableBits (PR #85858)

2024-03-19 Thread via lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb Author: Alex Langford (bulbazord) Changes AddressableBits is in the Utility module of LLDB. It currently directly refers to Process, which is from the Target LLDB module. This is a layering violation which concretely means that it is impossible

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Invert relationship between Process and AddressableBits (PR #85858)

2024-03-19 Thread Alex Langford via lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85858 AddressableBits is in the Utility module of LLDB. It currently directly refers to Process, which is from the Target LLDB module. This is a layering violation which concretely means that it is impossible to