https://github.com/JOE1994 requested changes to this pull request.
* The PR contains irrelevant changes to `X86` codegen.
* Author of the commit shows up as another contributor.
It seems like the author of this PR did a `git commit --amend`
on top of e586556e375fc5c4f7e76b5c299cb981f2016108 to a
https://github.com/JOE1994 reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91880
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
adrian-prantl wrote:
That's just not how the LLVM project operates.
I'd rather deal with two conflicting PRs than deal with an assigned orphaned
issue that the assignee lost interest in.
This is in the end a communication problem, and I don't mind if someone
responds to the bug to say that they
JOE1994 wrote:
> We usually don't grant exclusive rights to work on an issue in the project,
> since individual priorities may always change and people might loose interest
> in an issue. Typically this kind of conflict doesn't happen very often
> either.
I understand that, but just for "goo
adrian-prantl wrote:
> A new user already asked to be assigned to work on #91209 2 days ago in the
> comments. **I think that user deserves an opportunity to work on the issue**.
>
> Next time when you see a **"good first issue"** which a new user had already
> asked to get assigned to, please
https://github.com/JOE1994 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91880
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
JOE1994 wrote:
A new user already asked to be assigned to work on #91209 2 days ago in the
comments.
**I think that user deserves an opportunity to work on the issue**.
Next time when you see a **"good first issue"** which a new user had already
asked to get assigned to,
please assign it to th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: None (aabhinavg)
Changes
Author: aabhinavg
Date: Sun May 12 12:46:54 2024 +0800
Reviewers: @JOE1994, @chelcassanova, @dcb314
Fixes: #91209
Summary of Changes:
- Replaced the ineffective call to 'substr' w
https://github.com/aabhinavg created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91880
Author: aabhinavg
Date: Sun May 12 12:46:54 2024 +0800
Reviewers: @JOE1994, @chelcassanova, @dcb314
Fixes: #91209
Summary of Changes:
- Replaced the ineffective call to 'substr' with a more efficient use of