walter-erquinigo wrote:
@Dodzey, the typescript extension has been merged and, if you want, you can
implement an integrated process picker for lldb-dap.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
lldb-commits mailing list
walter-erquinigo wrote:
Here it is https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75515!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
walter-erquinigo wrote:
@Dodzey , I think I'll add the minimal TS project tonight and you can review
it. Then we can add a few additional features there are as follow ups
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
lldb-commits mailing list
walter-erquinigo wrote:
> Would you want the minimal typescript extension to be a separate extension
> from the main lldb-dap one?, or would it be okay to have the typescript in
> the lldb-dap project/extension?
It should be part of the lldb-dap folder/project and it should also be the
Dodzey wrote:
I've just checked one possible failure mode that came to mind. Do you get an
error if you didn't have the MS CPPTools extension enabled and you attempt to
use a launch profile with a hardcoded pid (`"pid": 1000 or no pid specified -
so auto detecting a single running process),
Dodzey wrote:
@clayborg Yes, it appears to. For context my workflow is C++ development,
using recent versions of Clang and GCC. In VS Code I use the Microsoft CPPTools
extension to allow for GDB debugging of GCC builds, with intellisense disabled.
I am using clangd for auto-completion, inlay
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
LGTM. Since @Dodzey is a first-time contributor one of us needs to click the
merge button. I'll leave that to @clayborg or @walter-erquinigo as the owners.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
https://github.com/clayborg approved this pull request.
This looks good to me for now. We can coordinate on adding a native TypeScript
layer after this, but no need to hold this up if this work!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
Dodzey wrote:
@walter-erquinigo
Good to hear that I'm on the right track. Would you want the minimal typescript
extension to be a separate extension from the main lldb-dap one?, or would it
be okay to have the typescript in the lldb-dap project/extension?
It looks to me from my inspection of
walter-erquinigo wrote:
@dodzey, thanks for submitting this PR.
@clayborg and I have recently been discussing the idea of implementing a
minimal typescript extension for lldb-dap, which could host the kind of
functionality that you are trying to fix.
I haven't had yet time to do it, but it's
https://github.com/Dodzey edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
@clayborg and @walter-erquinigo are lldb-dap code owners and should be able to
advise.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Dodzey edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Dodzey edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Dodzey edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Dodzey edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: None (Dodzey)
Changes
Hi,
I see that the documentation for lldb-dap refers to a ${command.pickMyProcess}
which can be used for interactive process selection within the VS Code IDE. It
appears that this functionality no longer works,
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/Dodzey created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75342
Hi,
I see that the documentation for lldb-dap refers to a ${command.pickMyProcess}
which can be used for interactive process selection within the VS Code IDE. It
appears that this functionality no longer works,
19 matches
Mail list logo
