tberghammer accepted this revision.
tberghammer added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I see your point. I am still not too happy with this approach but I don't have
any better idea to solve it. I am fine with committing it in in this format and
we can improve it
ovyalov added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12025#224355, @tberghammer wrote:
The implementation looks good, but I don't like the approach you try to
handle the problem.
I think you do far too much work to use UriParser in a case where it isn't
necessary and isn't make things
