labath added a subscriber: jingham.
labath added a comment.
We (mostly me and @jingham) discussed that idea (very) briefly a couple of
weeks ago, and my impression was that this (reinitializing SBDebugger for every
test) would be a good way to go. There are just too many things that can leak
tatyana-krasnukha added a comment.
I like this idea and ready to implement, but I'm not aware of the reasons why
the current implementation was chosen. Suppose that initializing the Debugger
for each test will slow down the test-suite significantly.
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE
teemperor added a comment.
I'm kinda curious how much we actually support this? I know we do a lot of
random fiddling with settings and what not, but I feel if we anyway say that
each test needs to have a clean setup, can't we just create like a new
SBDebugger instance or something like that
tatyana-krasnukha created this revision.
tatyana-krasnukha added reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath.
tatyana-krasnukha added a project: LLDB.
Herald added subscribers: lldb-commits, teemperor.
Some tests set settings and don't clean them up, this leads to side effects in
other tests.
The patch
