[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D87590: Backport D79219, D85820, D86134 to 10.0 branch

bcardiff abandoned this revision. bcardiff added a comment. Closing in favor of D84563 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87590/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87590

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D87590: Backport D79219, D85820, D86134 to 10.0 branch

haampie added a comment. Also note that the changes are not likely to be backported to 11 even: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG31e5f7120bdd2f76337686d9d169b1c00e6ee69c#942622 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87590/new/

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D87590: Backport D79219, D85820, D86134 to 10.0 branch

labath added subscribers: tstellar, labath. labath added a reviewer: tstellar. labath added a comment. @tstellar, who is (was) the release manager for 10.0, can make a definitive call, but our usual modus operandi is to have one point release for each major version. I don't know if this is a

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D87590: Backport D79219, D85820, D86134 to 10.0 branch

labath added a comment. In D87590#2273721 , @haampie wrote: > Also note that the changes are not likely to be backported to 11 even: > https://reviews.llvm.org/rG31e5f7120bdd2f76337686d9d169b1c00e6ee69c#942622. 11.0.0, probably. There's should be enough

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D87590: Backport D79219, D85820, D86134 to 10.0 branch

haampie added a comment. D86134 should not be added, it was reverted afterwards. What eventually landed was D85820 , which adds a better fix for what D86134 was supposed to solve. Repository:

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D87590: Backport D79219, D85820, D86134 to 10.0 branch

bcardiff created this revision. bcardiff added reviewers: JDevlieghere, phosek, smeenai. Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, lldb-commits, Sanitizers, cfe-commits, hiraditya, mgorny. Herald added projects: clang, Sanitizers, LLDB, LLVM. bcardiff requested review of this revision. Changes