Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:03 PM Todd Fiala wrote: > Nothing concrete at the moment; however, it could be interesting to look > at the clang community and see what could be done for llvm-based language > implementations. The angle that I think would be interesting would be

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

Usage of static bindings for the prepare_bindings.py script went in here: r253448. Only Xcode provides the flag to use it. The commit description indicates how it works in this incarnation. Essentially it only uses the static Python binding if and only if a swig isn't specified or cannot be

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

Is there any way to have the step that runs the swig executable not be part of this script? Seems like running swig should be a build step, and running these scripts on the output of swig should be a step that follows On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:20 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-commits <

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

Yes, I am planning on separating out the usage of the swig output from the massaging of that into the build. Right now I'm just in phase 1, which is to clean up the existing process without modifying it, and adopting it on Xcode. Humorously, with our recent removal of the searching for swig in

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:18 AM Todd Fiala wrote: > Breaking out the binding generation into a separate step will also be > important for a couple reasons: > > * (from before) I want to eliminate the requirement for the vast majority > of the builds to have a swig on their

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

Moving this back over to the list since I'm sure others have some input here. Also +lldb-dev since it has more visibility than lldb-commits. On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:25 AM Zachary Turner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:18 AM Todd Fiala wrote: >

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

Nothing concrete at the moment; however, it could be interesting to look at the clang community and see what could be done for llvm-based language implementations. The angle that I think would be interesting would be if we can generate bindings more effectively based on the in-depth understanding

Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

Stepping one step back further in the thread ... On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Moving this back over to the list since I'm sure others have some input > here. Also +lldb-dev since it has more visibility than

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

Author: tfiala Date: Tue Nov 17 01:17:38 2015 New Revision: 253317 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=253317=rev Log: Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script. This is only used by Xcode at the moment. It replaces the buildSwigWrapperClasses.py and related