[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

stella.stamenova added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#122, @aprantl wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1299989, @stella.stamenova wrote: > > > We should also remove LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER and LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER from > > the cmake files along with this change,

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

aprantl added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#130, @zturner wrote: > http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-clang-5.0.2/ > > What do I need to click on to get the equivalent of this: >

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

stella.stamenova added a comment. We should also remove LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER and LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER from the cmake files along with this change, otherwise, people will still expect them to work. https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567 ___

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1299982, @aprantl wrote: > > Removal of functionality - The lit test suite no longer respects > > LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER and LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER. This means there is no > > more support for gcc, but nobody was using this anyway

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

aprantl added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#127, @zturner wrote: > It's possible I didn't make this part clear enough. I didn't mean that > nobody is using `LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER`, I meant that nobody is using it **in > order to compile inferiors with gcc**. There is also

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

stella.stamenova added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#129, @zturner wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#123, @stella.stamenova wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#122, @aprantl wrote: > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1299989,

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

aprantl added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#123, @stella.stamenova wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#122, @aprantl wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1299989, @stella.stamenova wrote: > > > > > We should also remove LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER and

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

stella.stamenova added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300030, @aprantl wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#130, @zturner wrote: > > > http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-clang-5.0.2/ > > > > What do I need to click on to get the equivalent of

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

aprantl added a comment. > Removal of functionality - The lit test suite no longer respects > LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER and LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER. This means there is no more > support for gcc, but nobody was using this anyway (note: The functionality is > still there for the dotest suite, just

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

aprantl added a comment. There is also this bot that does something similar with even more compilers, including gcc: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake/builds/31242 Do you happen to know who maintains it? https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

aprantl added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1299989, @stella.stamenova wrote: > We should also remove LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER and LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER from > the cmake files along with this change, otherwise, people will still expect > them to work. That would not be a good

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300028, @aprantl wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#127, @zturner wrote: > > > It's possible I didn't make this part clear enough. I didn't mean that > > nobody is using `LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER`, I meant that nobody is

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54476: [CMake] Streamline code signing for debugserver

sgraenitz added a comment. Last revision changed a lot, but I think support for reconfigurations is worth it. The current state would be acceptable from my side now -- if I didn't miss anything! :-) Comment at: tools/debugserver/source/CMakeLists.txt:101

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300031, @stella.stamenova wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300030, @aprantl wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#130, @zturner wrote: > > > > >

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300029, @stella.stamenova wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#129, @zturner wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#123, @stella.stamenova wrote: > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#122, @aprantl

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54476: [CMake] Streamline code signing for debugserver

sgraenitz updated this revision to Diff 174253. sgraenitz marked an inline comment as not done. sgraenitz edited the summary of this revision. sgraenitz added a comment. Handle reconfigurations correctly; fix configuration messages; add note for generator expressions

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54476: [CMake] Streamline code signing for debugserver

sgraenitz updated this revision to Diff 174254. sgraenitz added a comment. Improve description for options LLDB_NO_DEBUGSERVER and LLDB_USE_SYSTEM_DEBUGSERVER https://reviews.llvm.org/D54476 Files: test/CMakeLists.txt tools/debugserver/CMakeLists.txt

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300083, @stella.stamenova wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300064, @zturner wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300029, @stella.stamenova wrote: > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#129, @zturner

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

stella.stamenova added a comment. > That said, in the interest of not changing too much all at once, it still > seems like something that's perhaps better done in a future patch. WDYT? I actually think it would be better now - the people who use the properties for compile the lit tests will

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54510: Force SHELL to be cmd.exe on Windows for the test suite

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rLLDB346993: Force SHELL to be cmd.exe on Windows for the test suite (authored by lanza, committed by ). Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits. Changed prior to commit:

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

aprantl added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300035, @zturner wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300028, @aprantl wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#127, @zturner wrote: > > > > > It's possible I didn't make this part clear enough. I didn't mean that

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

JDevlieghere added a comment. Personally I don't think we should differentiate between the lit and dotest suite when it comes to using a custom compiler. The separation between the two suits is mostly the result of what framework is easier to write your test is (or which one you're more

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54544: Implement basic DidAttach and DidLaunch for DynamicLoaderWindowsDYLD

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rLLDB346994: Implement basic DidAttach and DidLaunch for DynamicLoaderWindowsDYLD (authored by lanza, committed by ). Herald added subscribers: lldb-commits, abidh. Changed prior to commit:

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54544: Implement basic DidAttach and DidLaunch for DynamicLoaderWindowsDYLD

Hui added inline comments. Comment at: source/Plugins/DynamicLoader/Windows-DYLD/DynamicLoaderWindowsDYLD.cpp:75 + +void DynamicLoaderWindowsDYLD::DidLaunch() { + Log *log(GetLogIfAnyCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_DYNAMIC_LOADER)); I think

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r346991 - A unit test file moved.

Author: jmolenda Date: Thu Nov 15 12:28:55 2018 New Revision: 346991 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=346991=rev Log: A unit test file moved. Modified: lldb/trunk/lldb.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj Modified: lldb/trunk/lldb.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj URL:

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54601: Makefile.rules: Use a shared clang module cache directory.

aprantl created this revision. aprantl added reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, jingham, vsk. Just to be safe, up until now each test used its own Clang module cache directory. Since the compiler within one testsuite doesn't change it is just as safe to share a clang module directory inside the

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r346999 - Fix compilation failure in unit tests on Windows.

Author: zturner Date: Thu Nov 15 14:03:49 2018 New Revision: 346999 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=346999=rev Log: Fix compilation failure in unit tests on Windows. Modified: lldb/trunk/unittests/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteTestUtils.cpp Modified:

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300183, @JDevlieghere wrote: > Personally I don't think we should differentiate between the lit and dotest > suite when it comes to using a custom compiler. The separation between the > two suits is mostly the result of what

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54602: Use a shared module cache directory for LLDB.

aprantl created this revision. aprantl added reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, jingham, vsk. aprantl added a dependency: D54601: Makefile.rules: Use a shared clang module cache directory.. This saves about 3 redundant gigabytes from the Objective-C test build directories. Tests that must do

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54616: [Reproducers] Improve reproducer API and add unit tests.

JDevlieghere created this revision. JDevlieghere added reviewers: davide, shafik, friss, jingham. JDevlieghere added a project: LLDB. Herald added subscribers: abidh, mgorny. When I landed the initial reproducer framework I knew there were some things that needed improvement. Rather than

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54601: Makefile.rules: Use a shared clang module cache directory.

JDevlieghere accepted this revision. JDevlieghere added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. LGTM https://reviews.llvm.org/D54601 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54602: Use a shared module cache directory for LLDB.

JDevlieghere accepted this revision. JDevlieghere added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. LGTM https://reviews.llvm.org/D54602 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54601: Makefile.rules: Use a shared clang module cache directory.

aprantl updated this revision to Diff 174311. aprantl added a comment. Small bugfix + an error message that would have caught it. https://reviews.llvm.org/D54601 Files: lit/lit.cfg.py packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/make/Makefile.rules Index:

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

JDevlieghere added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300459, @zturner wrote: > I'm not sure how hard it would be. > > One problem is that dotest supports not just choosing a compiler, but > choosing multiple compilers, as well as multiple architectures and it runs > the test suite

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54476: [CMake] Streamline code signing for debugserver

JDevlieghere accepted this revision. JDevlieghere added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Thanks for working on this, Stefan. This LGTM. https://reviews.llvm.org/D54476 ___ lldb-commits mailing list

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r347020 - Don't use uniform initialization syntax.

Author: zturner Date: Thu Nov 15 19:16:27 2018 New Revision: 347020 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=347020=rev Log: Don't use uniform initialization syntax. Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/NativePDB/PdbIndex.cpp

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300641, @JDevlieghere wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300459, @zturner wrote: > > > I'm not sure how hard it would be. > > > > One problem is that dotest supports not just choosing a compiler, but > > choosing multiple

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r347018 - [NativePDB] Rewrite the PdbSymUid to use our own custom namespacing scheme.

Author: zturner Date: Thu Nov 15 18:42:32 2018 New Revision: 347018 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=347018=rev Log: [NativePDB] Rewrite the PdbSymUid to use our own custom namespacing scheme. Originally we created our 64-bit UID scheme by using the first byte as sort of a "tag" to

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300029, @stella.stamenova wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#129, @zturner wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#123, @stella.stamenova wrote: > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#122, @aprantl

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54567: Fix LLDB's lit files

stella.stamenova added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300064, @zturner wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#1300029, @stella.stamenova wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#129, @zturner wrote: > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567#123,

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r346981 - Port the Darwin universal binary testcase to x86_64.

Author: adrian Date: Thu Nov 15 11:15:03 2018 New Revision: 346981 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=346981=rev Log: Port the Darwin universal binary testcase to x86_64. Xcode 10 doesn't ship with an i386 SDK any more. This patch ports the testcase from an i386/x86_64 ->

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D53008: Add a check whether or not a str is utf8 prior to emplacing

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rLLDB346988: Add a check whether or not a str is utf8 prior to emplacing (authored by lanza, committed by ). Herald added subscribers: lldb-commits, abidh. Changed prior to commit:

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54617: [wip][Reproducers] Add file provider

JDevlieghere created this revision. Herald added a subscriber: mgorny. JDevlieghere added a subscriber: labath. This patch is WIP and meant to showcase how the reproducer and VFS will interact. Repository: rLLDB LLDB https://reviews.llvm.org/D54617 Files: include/lldb/Host/FileSystem.h

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54617: [wip][Reproducers] Add file provider

JDevlieghere added a comment. - Initialization of the FS needs to happen in the driver. - All file access has to go through the new FileSystem. - Needs tests. Repository: rLLDB LLDB https://reviews.llvm.org/D54617 ___ lldb-commits mailing list

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54602: Use a shared module cache directory for LLDB.

davide accepted this revision. davide added a comment. lgtm https://reviews.llvm.org/D54602 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits