Great to hear! I will make this change to the style guide in the coming
days if nobody objects further.
In the meantime, I would love for you guys (and anyone else for that
matter) to try out clang-format. It would be great to work out any kinks
in the existing rules file. For cases where there
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Zachary Turner wrote:
>
> I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt :) TBH I'd be even happier
> if we just use the LLVM rule consistently. But it's often easier for people
> to do this slowly. From your original response though it sounds like you
> mi
I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt :) TBH I'd be even
happier if we just use the LLVM rule consistently. But it's often easier
for people to do this slowly. From your original response though it sounds
like you might be fine just removing this rule and going with the LLVM
style.
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:59 AM, Zachary Turner wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 11:56:44 AM wrote:
>
> I actually do think that having the space between the complex visual noise of
> the argument list and the function name makes it easier to detect functions
> when scanning code, which
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Zachary Turner wrote:
>
> A while back I asked about the possibility of bringing our style guide closer
> to LLVM's. To that end, I made a clang-format configuration file for LLDB
> and included it at the base of LLDB's repo. At the time I didn't know this,
>
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 11:56:44 AM wrote:
>
> I actually do think that having the space between the complex visual noise
> of the argument list and the function name makes it easier to detect
> functions when scanning code, which was why we did it this way to start.
> That and from years of workin
one thing I forgot to add. The reason I'm bringing this up now is because
I've seen more activity in LLDB over the past 2 months or so. Off the top
of my head, we have people actively supporting Linux, Android, FreeBSD,
Apple, Hexagon, multiple platforms with lldb-mi. I've also started to see
mo
A while back I asked about the possibility of bringing our style guide
closer to LLVM's. To that end, I made a clang-format configuration file
for LLDB and included it at the base of LLDB's repo. At the time I didn't
know this, and I had my own hacked up solution, but it turns out it's very
easy
