Dear testers,
There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in
a better state now.
6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506.
Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries.
Thanks,
Hans
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-d
> On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Davide Italiano via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
>> On 6 February 2018 at 15:41, Davide Italiano wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
On 6 February 2018 at 04:11, Davide Italiano via ll
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
> On 6 February 2018 at 15:51, Davide Italiano wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I strongly believe we should all agree on a configuration to run
>> tests and standardize on that.
>> It's unfortunate that we have two build systems, but there are plans
>> to mo
On 6 February 2018 at 15:51, Davide Italiano wrote:
>
> FWIW, I strongly believe we should all agree on a configuration to run
> tests and standardize on that.
> It's unfortunate that we have two build systems, but there are plans
> to move away from manually generating xcodebuild, as many agree i
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
> On 7 February 2018 at 14:20, Zachary Turner wrote:
>>
>> As someone who gave up on trying to set up a bot due to flakiness, I
have a
>> different experience.
>
> I did not say it was easy to get to the present point, and I am
> certain that th
On 7 February 2018 at 14:20, Zachary Turner wrote:
>
> As someone who gave up on trying to set up a bot due to flakiness, I have a
> different experience.
I did not say it was easy to get to the present point, and I am
certain that the situation is much harder on windows. But I believe
this is du
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:38 AM Pavel Labath wrote:
> On 6 February 2018 at 18:53, Zachary Turner wrote:
> > I'm not claiming that it's definitely caused by dotest and that moving
> away
> > from dotest is going to fix all the problems. Rather, I'm claiming that
> > dotest has an unknown amount
On 6 February 2018 at 18:53, Zachary Turner wrote:
> I'm not claiming that it's definitely caused by dotest and that moving away
> from dotest is going to fix all the problems. Rather, I'm claiming that
> dotest has an unknown amount of flakiness (which may be 0, but may be
> large), and the alte
