[lldb-dev] RFC: Simplifying SymbolFile interface

The Native PDB symbol file plugin I think is mostly complete. It's at least almost as good as the old Windows-only PDB plugin in 90% of ways, while actually being significantly better in other ways (for example, there was a test that took over 2 minutes to run with the Windows-only PDB plugin,

[lldb-dev] [monorepo] Downstream repo import tool available

I've created a tool that takes a downstream repository and imports it into the monorepo such that trees appear under a given subdirectory in the monorepo: https://github.com/jyknight/llvm-git-migration/pull/6 This is useful for downstream users who have repositories that make heavy use of LLVM

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:42 AM Pavel Labath wrote: > On 09/01/2019 17:15, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 5:05 AM Pavel Labath > > wrote: > > > > On 08/01/2019 21:57, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: > > > Before I got around to coding this

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

On 09/01/2019 17:15, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 5:05 AM Pavel Labath > wrote: On 08/01/2019 21:57, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: > Before I got around to coding this up I realized you can't take the > address of constructors in C++, so

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 5:05 AM Pavel Labath wrote: > On 08/01/2019 21:57, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: > > Before I got around to coding this up I realized you can't take the > > address of constructors in C++, so the function address won't work as an > > identifier. > > > > You gave up way too

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

On 08/01/2019 21:57, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: Before I got around to coding this up I realized you can't take the address of constructors in C++, so the function address won't work as an identifier. You gave up way too easily. :P I realized that constructors are going to be tricky, but I

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [cfe-dev] 7.0.1-final has been tagged

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:25 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > On 01/08/2019 11:36 AM, Ian Tessier via Release-testers wrote: > > Can the ubuntu tarballs be published to the download site? They're not > available yet. > > > > These are up on the download site now. > Tom, releases.llvm.org only shows

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Using Sphinx to generate documentation

Hey Jonas that looks great! And what a nice way to do the review. Two of the pages from "RESOURCES" are in the new docs now: Testing LLDB and The SB API Coding Rules Will they be removed from the root page and/or do the others follow? Added a few notes on escape characters to the review. > The

[lldb-dev] [8.0.0 Release] One week to the branch

Hello everyone, This is just a quick reminder that the upcoming release branch is scheduled for creation one week from today, on Wednesday 16 January 2019. The full schedule is available under "Upcoming Releases" in the right column at https://llvm.org. Please try to avoid committing disruptive