On 11/12/2019 10:03 AM, Jonas Devlieghere wrote:
> Hey Tom,
>
> That sounds really useful. Would it be possible to include LLDB as
> well? We have a subset of tests (unit & lit) that can be run without
> Python/SWIG by passing LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON=ON to CMake.
>
I can try to add an lldb builder.
Hey Tom,
That sounds really useful. Would it be possible to include LLDB as
well? We have a subset of tests (unit & lit) that can be run without
Python/SWIG by passing LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON=ON to CMake.
Thanks,
Jonas
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 2:35 AM Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:32 AM Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start using GitHub Actions[1] for CI testing on the release/*
> branches. As far as I know we don't have any buildbots listening to the
> release branches, and I think GitHub Actions are a good way for us
Hi,
thanks for the feedback, I did some more investigation and now I understand
a bit better where the LayoutRecordType calls are coming from. They are
initiated by
Clang's code generation for types, which insists on generating full LLVM
types
for any complete RecordDecl (see
https://github.com/l
Hi Tom,
This sounds very interesting! +1 from me.
What does this imply for the release testers?
Would it be possible / desirable for us to add self-hosted runners for
other architectures? I'm assuming GitHub only provides x86, right? I
totally missed any details about that in their docs, but it se
Although I've not had any Github Action experience, and despite being one
who has raised objections to other parts of adopting github features, this
sounds like a sensible idea. It seems odd to me that we don't already have
some form of CI for our releases, so anything that improves on that is
grea
Hi Tatyana,
Thank you for your reply! 🙂
If I understand correctly, TargetOpcode::G_{LOAD, STORE} do not cover x86’s mov
instructions (and other relevant instructions of both x86 the rest of supported
architectures) and such, which also access memory, however I will look into it
more.
Addition
