Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 1:14 PM Andrzej Warzynski wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thank you for helping with the release! > > On 20/09/2021 18:40, Brian Cain via Openmp-dev wrote: > > I also disabled flang (-no-flang) because of > > memory exhaustion while trying to build. Is this increased memory > >

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 13.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

Ubuntu 20 binary uploaded. I also disabled flang (-no-flang) because of memory exhaustion while trying to build. Is this increased memory consumption expected or could it be a bug? $ cat clang+llvm-13.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-20.04.tar.xz.sha256

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Mailing List Status Update

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 3:16 PM Kevin P. Neal via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 12:58:22PM -0700, David Blaikie via cfe-dev wrote: > >>On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 12:53 PM Chris Lattner via cfe-dev > >><[1]cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >>Hi

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 12.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

SLES12, Ubuntu 16.04 uploaded - now to the correct path - thanks for the reminder, Hans! e96a6402cc139323d64e20570c63b7e8c5d442e7338a1cae6c3234db06431883 clang+llvm-12.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz dc498c1caabc57ae94b191fbcb887d7a557279f3eecb2206dbdd3ede5793dc98

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 12.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

Attempted upload of Ubuntu 16.04 (below), but it too ran out of space. Maybe I'm copying to the wrong remote path? Dimitry, how did you get your upload to work? e96a6402cc139323d64e20570c63b7e8c5d442e7338a1cae6c3234db06431883 clang+llvm-12.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz On Thu,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 12.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

Uploaded SLES12 but I did encounter the same ENOSPC that others have reported. $ cat clang+llvm-12.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz.sha256 dc498c1caabc57ae94b191fbcb887d7a557279f3eecb2206dbdd3ede5793dc98 clang+llvm-12.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:27 PM

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 12.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

lit tests require python 3.6 now but CMake nor test-release.sh screen for this. It's definitely a nice-to-have, though. Older platforms like SLES12 and Ubuntu Xenial don't have a native 3.6. I'll add a local python build to get the test suite going. Apologies -- I realize it's not as helpful

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-final has been tagged.

Ubuntu16 uploaded: $ cat clang+llvm-11.1.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz.sha256 c691a558967fb7709fb81e0ed80d1f775f4502810236aa968b4406526b43bee1 clang+llvm-11.1.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:06 PM Tom Stellard via Release-testers <

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-rc3 has been tagged

Uploaded x86_64 Ubuntu 16.04: $ cat clang+llvm-11.1.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz.sha256 3299ea97ed2bb9f6d583e718573d2153491a984ee5401c01e994f3fb98b0d607 clang+llvm-11.1.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:15 AM Tom Stellard via Release-testers <

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-final has been tagged

Uploaded Ubuntu 16, SLES12. $ cat clang+llvm-11.0.1-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz.sha256 clang+llvm-11.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz.sha256 77cd59cf6f932cf2b3c9a68789d1bd3f7ba9f471a28f6ba25e25deb1a0806e0d clang+llvm-11.0.1-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged

Uploaded Ubuntu 16 and SLES12: d2cdda0d8b1f4fe44eb8a7751e488b5601d820dc260e81c73b05b5725ea4ca6a clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz da035f77cf043fc0c31842b0e54c1c47d893895ac109b261c6d91ea8aeccabc1 clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

Uploaded Ubuntu 16 tarball: dcd37b46d2b3002d078ff38d967e674f4837090c4f61ee403f2cb0ada6a6dbd2 clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz BTW - Neil -- if you decide to post binaries for Ubuntu 20, you should know that there was a request in another thread to include LLDB in the

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here

Uploaded binaries for SLES12 and Ubuntu 16 x86_64. I realized that I'd forgotten rc3,4 ones so I uploaded them too. $ cat clang+llvm-11.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz.sha256 clang+llvm-11.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz.sha256

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here

Uploaded Ubuntu 16 and SLES12 binaries: $ cat clang+llvm-11.0.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz.sha256 clang+llvm-11.0.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz.sha256 051d288dfc6ef9ff8e37d97b722695390427c617d3b538a93f2d0d413fb6f54a clang+llvm-11.0.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 10.0.1-final has been tagged

Uploaded sles12, ubuntu16: $ cat clang+llvm-10.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz.sha256 48b83ef827ac2c213d5b64f5ad7ed082c8bcb712b46644e0dc5045c6f462c231 clang+llvm-10.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz $ cat clang+llvm-10.0.1-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz.sha256

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc4 tagged

Uploaded: dcf43e25a77a2ffb4ffaa5a04babe409b2b3ffac07bc989a1dca730ecacb43c2 clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc4-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz 6db54d9f55fb41877b23f4b89e7b68d44fcc5378d615d232c820307237dc33f7 clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc2-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 is here

Uploaded Ubuntu 18.04 binaries: 7ebc00479d05772e56c34c1b0f40295af2dd4a6b165d9107946ff2cdb7c219ac clang+llvm-10.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04.tar.xz On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 7:49 AM Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It took a bit longer than

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here

Uploaded ubuntu 18 binaries. $ cat clang+llvm-10.0.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04.tar.xz.sha256 8ca2cd0e0ba2243c095134373b46ccad822192b0495ce13eb0af33e12f9d17e1 clang+llvm-10.0.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04.tar.xz On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:34 PM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 9.0.1-final has been tagged

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:29 AM Tom Stellard wrote: > On 01/08/2020 09:24 AM, Brian Cain wrote: > > Tom, the 9.0.1 final binaries didn't (yet?) make it to the github > release page > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-9.0.1 > > > > The binaries have been posted now. > > I

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 9.0.1-final has been tagged

Tom, the 9.0.1 final binaries didn't (yet?) make it to the github release page https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-9.0.1 I also checked https://releases.llvm.org/ because I recall some debate or back-and-forth about where the releases should go and/or redirects or links from

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 9.0.1-final has been tagged

Uploaded Ubuntu 16. 608285fb0503ee6d15ce9acb8f4575bba4d78e06 clang+llvm-9.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:07 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just tagged the 9.0.1-final release. Testers can begin uploading >

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 6 is here

Uploaded ubuntu x86 binaries: 4361dc68e47b9972f0ec7db0c20411f60df90f28 clang+llvm-9.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz 085f223d48fd6fcf372f54ccdf8bbac403c279a2 clang+llvm-9.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz b1627073e533975f0b4d4366b5f6e4dd44c7c6d8

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here

Uploaded SLES11 and Ubuntu 16 binaries: 1c7895122974828c678f7059e0427d0228ab41e5 clang+llvm-9.0.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz d23219bc416afdf2a7eff11490dfb497001dc3a4 clang+llvm-9.0.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 5:26 AM Hans Wennborg via

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here

Oh! Indeed, that was probably it. I'll try again. On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 5:26 AM Hans Wennborg wrote: > No, there should be no mismatch now. Maybe you ended up using a > version of test-release.sh that doen't have the fixes? > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:47 PM Brian Cain wrote: > > > > When I

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here

When I built rv2 for SLES11 linux I saw the same phase 2/3 mismatch. Is that expected? On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 3:15 AM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683. > In the

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here

Uploaded Ubuntu 18.04 binaries: 190157033defcfc0796f06696a73979cb4201594 clang+llvm-9.0.0-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04.tar.xz I had three phase 2/3 comparison failures, opened PR42855. # Comparing Phase 2 and Phase 3 files file MachO_x86_64.cpp.o differs between phase 2 and phase 3 file

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 8.0.1-final has been tagged

Uploaded SLES11. a18ac0820acf7e4b19b917a143868a73ddb30a02 clang+llvm-8.0.1-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:10 AM Brian Cain wrote: > [previously I misdirected this message as a reply to the 9.0.0 thread, so > I'm reproducing here just in case] > > Uploaded ubuntu 14. >

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 8.0.1-final has been tagged

[previously I misdirected this message as a reply to the 9.0.0 thread, so I'm reproducing here just in case] Uploaded ubuntu 14. I had to kill some tests executing "lldb-vscode", they had been running for 12+ hours without completing. b57383860c7e4317b0194d1a91836e01bd637c95

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [9.0.0 Release] The release branch is open; trunk is now 10.0.0

Uploaded ubuntu 14. I had to kill some tests executing "lldb-vscode", they had been running for 12+ hours without completing. b57383860c7e4317b0194d1a91836e01bd637c95 clang+llvm-8.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 7:19 AM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 8.0.1-rc4 release has been tagged.

I noticed tests that didn't terminate on ubuntu-14.04 x86_64. Is PR40761 gating this release? On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:21 PM Dimitry Andric via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 11 Jul 2019, at 05:24, Tom Stellard via Release-testers < >

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 7.1.0-final has been tagged

Uploaded Ubuntu 14 and SLES 11 x86 binaries. 8a5d880f3ed2b10d80660d1029b0c958878c3cb7 clang+llvm-7.1.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz 81f5b08cc8cac534e4a7405de46a2ef28d978477 clang+llvm-7.1.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 7:00 PM Tom Stellard via Release-testers <

[lldb-dev] Reminder: Austin LLVM Social is today, at The Tavern

See you at The Tavern tonight at 6pm! 922 W 12th St, Austin, TX 78703 https://www.tavernaustin.com/ -- -Brian ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] NEW LOCATION - Re: April LLVM Austin social is this Thursday!

Update: we will meet instead at "The Tavern": 922 W 12th St, Austin, TX 78703 https://www.tavernaustin.com/ 11 April, 6:00pm On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 4:44 PM Brian Cain wrote: > Okay I will find something more centrally located. > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 2:26 PM Francesco Petrogalli < >

Re: [lldb-dev] April LLVM Austin social is this Thursday!

Okay I will find something more centrally located. On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 2:26 PM Francesco Petrogalli < francesco.petroga...@arm.com> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > 6 pm is a bit unfeasible for me, as I work on the other side of the city > (Southwest Parkway). How about meeting downtown, which hopefully

[lldb-dev] April LLVM Austin social is this Thursday!

Thursday 11 April Meet you at 6:00pm at Pour House (west of 183). Pour House 11835 Jollyville Rd, Austin, TX 78759 http://pourhousepintsandpies.com/ -- -Brian ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] Release 7.1.0 -rc1 has been tagged

Ubuntu 18.04 looks good: 4f26c25bb628196101e781f11d79bd7af392c113 clang+llvm-7.1.0-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04.tar.xz On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:27 PM Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just tagged 7.1.0-rc1. Testers, please begin

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

I forgot Ubuntu 14.04 is still useful for some folks (including me), so I've only just now built it and uploaded: 552ea458b70961b7922a4bbe9de1434688342dbf clang+llvm-8.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:39 AM Brian Cain wrote: > Uploaded ubuntu and SLES

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [GitHub] RFC: Enforcing no merge commit policy

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:00 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to follow up on the previous thread[1], where there was a > consensus > to disallow merge commits in the llvm github repository, and start a > discussion > about how we should enforce

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Uploaded ubuntu and SLES tarballs: db0a5f7729507ddc4b161eff70cffcf5de052347 clang+llvm-8.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz 2be69be355b012ae206dbc0ea7d84b831d77dc27 clang+llvm-8.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz 6aeb8aa0998d37be67d886b878f27de5e5ccc5e4

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc5 has been tagged

Hans, Sorry for the delay -- uploaded rc5 binaries: d52493c1c1082ae6be0a322a1b2d4a81e9f0d6c7 clang+llvm-8.0.0-rc5-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04.tar.xz af43eb9c4394175d26ff795d35dea2a5b4db80fa clang+llvm-8.0.0-rc5-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz 635cb99931ac9b166fa60702ac05b8e3a09a0290

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc3 has been tagged

Uploaded SLES11, Ubuntu 14.04, 18.04 binaries. 9e59c0c667cd67c61600470d2e3107576b4707c8 clang+llvm-8.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz 0fd5690c11f045ae4d356619620778b0c17942ff clang+llvm-8.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04.tar.xz 6d1dc9b31d4f4d815b7cd18c8446404dc2a80a69

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc2 has been tagged

Any tips or suggestions on how to isolate or identify this defect? It seems non-trivial to bisect this failure. Hans: presumably this bug should block the 8.0 release? On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:37 AM Brian Cain wrote: > rc1 did not exhibit this mismatch. A repeat of the rc2 build repeated

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc2 has been tagged

rc1 did not exhibit this mismatch. A repeat of the rc2 build repeated the mismatch. I diff'd the disassembly between phase 2 and phase 3 and the difference is the same on both builds. The difference follows: # diff x86isel_p{2,3}.s 2c2 <

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [8.0.0 Release] rc2 has been tagged

rc2 build on Ubuntu 16.04 saw a stage 2/3 mismatch on X86IselLowering.cpp.o -- I didn't try to build rc1 for 16.04 but I can try it now to see if it's there too. I can pass along logs if anyone wants to investigate. On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:41 AM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [cfe-dev] 7.0.1-final has been tagged

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:25 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > On 01/08/2019 11:36 AM, Ian Tessier via Release-testers wrote: > > Can the ubuntu tarballs be published to the download site? They're not > available yet. > > > > These are up on the download site now. > Tom, releases.llvm.org only shows

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 7.0.1-final has been tagged

Ubuntu and SLES tarballs uploaded. I haven't had a chance to make a SLES12 build yet, but I will try in the coming days. f7553a0d66092ca0bbe1eab2af405523a18bafba clang+llvm-7.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04.tar.xz 41db01a3b216df4fc22fae9c44e248889f9a01ed

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] 7.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged please begin testing

SLES binary uploaded: 181e1729263dcb1abc650311c4d42dbef13ae805 clang+llvm-7.0.1-rc2-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz ... I will try to get to ubuntu this week. On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:36 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > The 7.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Uploaded SLES binaries: 07d289c409e359f1d453d3b3ff66dfa36889d28b clang+llvm-7.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz 2c07e6f7ebcb71852ad3fe8d69dc7ca3ee580a59 clang+llvm-7.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles12.3.tar.xz On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:42 AM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc3 has been tagged

Uploaded sles binaries. ba4e93b281bc53372cea22da624c02dad566a7b6 clang+llvm-7.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz d3cbc4a96adbfd5480601bd6a9faf62879976cf8 clang+llvm-7.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-sles12.3.tar.xz On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:13 AM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged

SLES11 rc1 build failed, opened PR38589. Uploaded SLES12 rc1: 39ba1263db364999357fae8c6f2829b8fce7cfdd clang+llvm-7.0.0-rc1-x86_64-linux-sles12.3.tar.xz On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > 7.0.0-rc1 was

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Ok, yes, you're right -- thanks for clarification. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > libc++.so should be a linker script that automatically pulls in libc++abi > (see "Failed to read file header" in your output). And IIRC libc++abi is > only one possible

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Isn't libc++.so dependent on libc++abi.so? On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > From what I can see all of the libraries without RPATH are runtime > libraries that are used by binaries compiled with Clang. I think they don't > have a dependency on other

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

It was just brought to my attention that the RPATH configuration isn't uniform among the libraries produced by the release. Some use $ORIGIN../lib/ and others have none. Is this by design? It seems like it might be ideal for all of them to be configured the same way. If that makes sense I'll

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

Uploaded ubuntu, SLES11, SLES12 binaries. 4907dbd37f4e5265a2f1252d9d7b5e5b0a9c0ec1 clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz 360b26fcd9eafe5ca9c4baa89c38339bc587c094 clang+llvm-6.0.0-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz ce525cf949ef86409bc3f4f492035225989eecfd

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged

SLES11 binaries for rc3 uploaded. 55b63de8adc12c67eb11abcf1a5f7132cca59b4e clang+llvm-6.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > 6.0.0-rc3 was just tagged, after r325901

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged

Uploaded afeb7f66eedd4d576ba8df9b4a551bb1908186e6 clang+llvm-6.0.0-rc1-linux-x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. > > I know there

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] The final tag is in

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > The final version of 5.0.0 has just been tagged. There were no changes > after rc5. > > Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp. > > For those following

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 tagged

Uploaded SLES11 binary, no new failures. Test-suite no longer encounters SIGILL (PR34168) -- addressed by r312334, thanks! c09be7925c7eca370ea924d3b1da5e5ebf55146c clang+llvm-5.0.0-rc5-linux-x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 tagged

Uploaded rc4 and rc3 for SLES11. No new issues. 5560fd8bf543bf3cdcaf55caef159664bd2749f3 clang+llvm-5.0.0-rc3-linux- x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz effbb3a69efec75a67566d91dd4a9e685c2df15d clang+llvm-5.0.0-rc4-linux- x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Hans Wennborg via

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

Opened https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34168 rc2 uploaded to /home/testers/uploads/clang+llvm-5.0.0-rc2-linux-x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz -- I tried to use /data/testers-uploads/ but that failed. 292e39fe52d7404fcd5cd962cf8917600d45f507 rc2/clang+llvm-5.0.0-rc2-linux-x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

Much or all of "Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_*.test" (254 failures) seem to be failing for me with SIGILL. I'm guessing that my host CPU doesn't support the instructions we're testing? Is there already a bug on this failure? Are there any CPUID-style feature detection flags I can easily add to

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

[earlier I had accidentally sent this message to only Hans, re-sending as reply-all now] When I tried rc1 on sles11.3 x86_64, msan's getrlimit test fails to build for lack of prlimit(). SLES11.3 has glibc 2.11.3. Is there a minimum required glibc? I think this test implementation previously

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Tanya Lattner via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I personally find this email thread very hard to follow and read (this > isn’t anyones fault.. its just a lot of replies). I am sure others do as > well. I think it would be good to have a form/survey of

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.8 Release] 'final' has been tagged

CentOS 6 uploaded and tested. 05141a39af0998770e4bf1953980a10f69aca450 clang+llvm-3.8.0-linux-x86_64-centos6.tar.xz On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > My list of blockers is empty, and there were no

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.8 Release] 'final' has been tagged

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > My list of blockers is empty, and there were no new problems > discovered with rc3, so I have gone ahead and tagged 3.8.0-final [1]. > > Please build the final binaries

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.8 Release] RC3 has been tagged

Uploaded clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc3-linux-x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz and clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc3-linux-armhf-vivid.tar.xz f8f8b0ff8f9709cbf63097727a96fde5054efefe rc3/clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc3-linux-x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz 9202d52a9bff5464d0b76750c41ffec0d7d99c17 rc3/clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc3-linux-armhf-vivid.tar.xz

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] RC2 has been tagged

Tested RC2 w/SLES11.3, x86_64. No regressions. 81c1ea3fafee883fbbd396779d1e62714304eff6 rc2/clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-linux-x86_64-sles11.3.tar.xz On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev < cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > Release Candidate 2 has just been

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] RC1 has been tagged

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Brian Cain wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Brian Cain via cfe-dev < >> cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11SP3 x86_64 >>>

Re: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] RC1 has been tagged

I built rc1 on Ubuntu 15.04 armhf. Many tests fail (560, nearly all are libc++ and libc++abi). There's also a handful of unexpected passing tests (12). e29ac68df06f7fad8c773b7da9778469d84f3f32 rc1/clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc1-linux-armhf-vivid.tar.xz On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Hans Wennborg

Re: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] Schedule and call for testers

I can do SLES. I also have an arm7l ubuntu 15.x machine if no one else is already covering that target. On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Nikola Smiljanic wrote: > I'll do Fedora and openSUSE. > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Daniel Sanders >